691
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Gender difference on spatial visualization by college students’ major types as STEM and non-STEM: a meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1241-1255 | Received 25 Jun 2018, Published online: 19 Jul 2019

References

  • *Articles selected for analysis in the present meta-analysis
  • Allen, C. S., Chen, Q., Willson, V. L., & Hughes, J. N. (2009). Quality of research design moderates effects of grade retention on achievement: A meta-analytic, multilevel analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 480–499. doi: 10.3102/0162373709352239
  • Battista, M. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47–60. doi: 10.2307/749456
  • Beede, D. N., Julian, T. A., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., & Doms, M. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration, 4(11), 1–11.
  • Bicer, A., Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). STEM schools vs. non-STEM schools: Comparing students’ mathematics growth rate on high-stakes test performance. Journal of Global Education and Research, 3(3), 8–18.
  • Bicer, A., Nite, S. B., Capraro, R. M., Barroso, L. R., Capraro, M. M., & Lee, Y. (2017, October). Moving from STEM to STEAM: The effects of informal STEM learning on students’ creativity and problem solving skills with 3D printing. In 2017 IEEE frontiers in education conference proceedings, paper presented at the 47th annual frontiers in education (FIE) conference (pp. 1–6). Indianapolis, IN: IEEE.
  • Bishop, A. J. (1980). Spatial abilities and mathematics education-a review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 257–269. doi: 10.1007/BF00697739
  • *Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53, 402–414. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.402
  • *Bock, A. M. (2005). Gaze duration estimates and eye movements related to mental rotation tasks (Master’s thesis). Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.
  • *Brownlow, S., McPheron, T. K., & Acks, C. N. (2003). Science background and spatial abilities in men and women. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 371–380. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000006297.90536.7c
  • *Brus, C., Zhao, L., & Jessop, J. (2004, June). Visual–spatial ability in first-year engineering students: A useful retention variable? In Proceedings of the American society for engineering education (ASEE) annual conference and expositions (pp. 9.1407.1–9.1407.13). Salt Lake City, UT: American Society for Engineering Education.
  • Capraro, R. M. (2000). Exploring the effects of attitude toward mathematics, gender, and ethnicity on the acquisition of geometry content knowledge and geometric spatial visualization (Dissertation). Hattiesburg, MS: The University of Southern Mississippi.
  • Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., & Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 269–309. doi: 10.1080/07370000802177177
  • Cherney, I. D. (2008). Mom, Let Me Play More Computer Games: They Improve My Mental Rotation Skills. Sex Roles, 59, 776–786. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9498-z
  • Clements, D. (1998). Geometry and spatial thinking in young children. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
  • Contero, M., Etsii, D., & Saorín, J. L. (2007). Learning support tools for developing spatial abilities in engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 1–12.
  • Drickey, N. A. A. (2000). Comparison of virtual and physical manipulatives in teaching visualization and spatial reasoning to middle school mathematics students (pp. 1–138). Logan, UT: Utah State University.
  • Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850–855. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01990.x
  • *Ferrini-Mundy, J. (1987). Spatial training for calculus students: Sex differences in achievement and in visualization ability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 126–140. doi: 10.2307/749247
  • Guay, R. B. (1977). Purdue spatial visualization test – visualization of rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.
  • *Hake, R. R. (2002, August). Relationship of individual student normalized learning gains in mechanics with gender, high-school physics, and pretest scores on mathematics and spatial visualization. In Poster session presented at: The physics education research conference (PERC) (pp. 1–14). Boise, ID: Physics Education Research Topical Group & the American Association of Physics Teachers.
  • Halpern, D. F. (2007). Science, sex, and good sense: Why women are underrepresented in some areas of science and math. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 121–130). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • *Harris, L. J. (1978). Sex differences in spatial ability: Possible environmental, genetic, and neurological factors. In M. Kinsbourne (Ed.), Asymmetrical function of the brain (pp. 405–522). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hendroanto, A., van Galen, F., van Eerde, D., Prahmana, R. C. I., Setyawan, F., & Istiandaru, A. (2017). Photography activities for developing students’ spatial orientation and spatial visualization. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 1–9.
  • Higgins, J., Thompson, S. G., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2009). A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172(1), 137–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x
  • Johnson, E. S., & Meade, A. C. (1987). Developmental patterns of spatial ability: An early sex difference. Child Development, 58, 725–740. doi: 10.2307/1130210
  • Katsioloudis, P., Jovanovic, V., & Jones, M. (2014). A comparative analysis of spatial visualization ability and drafting models for industrial and technology education students. Journal of Technology Education, 26(1), 88–101. doi: 10.21061/jte.v26i1.a.6
  • Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831–1836. doi: 10.1177/0956797613478615
  • *Koch, D. S. (2006). The effects of solid modeling and visualization on technical problem solving (Dissertation). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  • Lee, Y., Capraro, M. M., & Viruru, R. (2018). The comparing motivating students’ STEM career aspirations: Personal and societal contexts. International Journal of Innovative Science and Modern Engineering, 26(5), 36–48.
  • *Lindsay, H. A. (2001). Factors related to achievement in sophomore organic chemistry at the University of Arkansas (Dissertation). Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas.
  • Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1986). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science performance. In J. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 67–101). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(4), 344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.022
  • *Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2011, June). Scaling the revised PSVT-R: Characteristics of the first year engineering students’ spatial ability. In Paper presented at 2011 ASEE annual conference and exposition (pp. 22.1273.1–22.1273.19). Vancouver, BC: American Society for Engineering Education.
  • *Maeda, Y., Yoon, S. Y., Kim-Kang, G., & Imbrie, P. K. (2013). Psychometric properties of the revised PSVT: R for measuring first year engineering students’ spatial ability. International Journal of Engineering Education, 29(3), 763–776.
  • McGee, M. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 889–918. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889
  • Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.03.012
  • Newcombe, N. S. (2007). Taking science seriously: Straight thinking about spatial sex differences. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.), Why aren’t more women in science?: Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 69–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Neyeloff, J. L., Fuchs, S. C., & Moreira, L. B. (2012). Meta-analyses and forest plots using a Microsoft excel spreadsheet: Step-by-step guide focusing on descriptive data analysis. BMC Research Notes, 5(52), 1–6.
  • *Parolini, L. L. (1994). Gender differences on predictors of success on the Purdue spatial visualization test: Rotations (Master’s thesis). Houghton, MI: Michigan Technological University.
  • *Provo, J. A. (1996). The effect of examination of a cross section on students’ ability to visualize anatomy in three dimensions (Master’s thesis). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (1985). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gender gap for parents and educators. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education (pp. 195–224). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
  • Riegle-Crumb, C., King, B., Grodsky, E., & Muller, C. (2012). The more things change, the more they stay the same? Prior achievement fails to explain gender inequality in entry into STEM college majors over time. American Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1048–1073. doi: 10.3102/0002831211435229
  • Sanchez, C. A., & Wiley, J. (2014). The role of dynamic spatial ability in geoscience text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 31, 33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.007
  • Sorby, S. A. (2000). Spatial abilities and their relationship to effective learning of 3-D solid modeling software. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 64(3), 30–35.
  • Sorby, S. A. (2007). Developing 3D spatial skills for engineering students. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 13(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1080/22054952.2007.11463998
  • *Sorby, S., Casey, B., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.03.010
  • Sterne, J. A., & Harbord, R. M. (2004). Funnel plots in meta-analysis. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 4, 127–141. doi: 10.1177/1536867X0400400204
  • *Stieff, M., Dixon, B. L., Ryu, M., Clover Kumi, B., & Hegarty, M. (2014). Strategy training eliminates sex differences in spatial problem solving in a stem domain. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 1–13. doi: 10.1037/a0034823
  • Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607–615. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9304-8
  • Tang, J., & Liu, J. L. (2000). Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 477–484. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00204-8
  • *Titus, S., & Horsman, E. (2009). Characterizing and improving spatial visualization skills. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57, 242–254. doi: 10.5408/1.3559671
  • Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 147–181. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2
  • Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367–373. doi: 10.1177/0963721413484756
  • Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
  • *Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Psychometric propertåies of the revised Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (the revised PSVT:R) (Dissertation). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
  • Yoon, S. Y., & Mann, E. L. (2017). Exploring the spatial ability of undergraduate students: Association with gender, stem majors, and gifted program membership. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(4), 313–327. doi: 10.1177/0016986217722614
  • *Yue, J., & Chen, D. M. (2001, June). Does CAD improve spatial visualization ability? In Proceedings of the American society for engineering education (ASEE) annual conference and expositions (pp. 6.394.1–6.394.8). Albuquerque, NM: American Society for Engineering Education.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.