Examining mathematical technological knowledge of pre-service middle grades teachers with Geometer’s Sketchpad in a geometry course

References

• Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547–564. doi: 10.14742/ajet.827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2015). Pre-service teachers’ TPACK competencies for spreadsheet integration: Insights from a mathematics-specific instructional technology course. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(5), 605–625. doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2015.1096822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J. S., & Stephens, B. (2011). Using technology to explore mathematical relationships: A framework for orienting mathematics courses for prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 285–304. doi: 10.1007/s10857-011-9168-x
   Google Scholar
• Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63–73. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.4.63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60–69. doi: 10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1
   Google Scholar
• Dockendorff, M., & Solar, H. (2018). ICT integration in mathematics initial teacher training and its impact on visualization: The case of GeoGebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(1), 66–84. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2017.1341060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finger, G., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Albion, P. (2010, September). Beyond pedagogical content knowledge: The importance of TPACK for informing preservice teacher education in Australia. In M. Turcanyis-Szabo & N. Reynolds (Eds.), IFIP international conference on key competencies in the knowledge society (pp. 114–125). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-15378-5_11
   Google Scholar
• Finzer, W. F., & Bennett, D. S. (1995). From drawing to construction with the Geometer's Sketchpad. The Mathematics Teacher, 88(5), 428.
   Google Scholar
• Getenet, S. T., Beswick, K., & Callingham, R. (2015). Conceptualising technology integrated mathematics teaching: The stamp knowledge framework. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Fielding-Wells (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 annual conference for the psychology of mathematics education (PME 39) (Vol. 2, pp. 321–328). Hobart: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (IGPME).
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2003). Perspectives on technology mediated learning in secondary school mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Grandgenett, N. F. (2008). Perhaps a matter of imagination: TPCK in mathematics education. In Aacte Committee on Innovation and Technology (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (pp. 145–165). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrero, S. (2010). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in the mathematics classroom. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(4), 132–139. doi: 10.1080/10402454.2010.10784646
   Google Scholar
• Haciomeroglu, E., Bu, L., Schoen, R., & Hohenwarter, M. (2011). Prospective teachers’ experiences in developing lessons with dynamic mathematics software. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, M. (2010). Enhancing preservice mathematics teachers’ TPCK. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(1), 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. (2010, March). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In D. Gibson, & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of the society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 3833–3840). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99–108). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P., & Kosko, K. (2012). Mathematical knowledge for teaching high school geometry. In L. van Zoest, J.-J. Lo, & J. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 438–444). Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351–365. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. (2004). Technology learning principles for preservice and in-service teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 345–362. Retrieved from www.citejournal.org/volume-4/issue-3-04/general/technology-learning-principles-for-preservice-and-in-service-teacher-education/.
   Google Scholar
• Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobrack, M., Chandler, K., Bossé, M. J., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2018). Problem-solving trajectories in a dynamic mathematics environment: The Geometer's Sketchpad. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching & Learning, 19(1), 69–89.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, C. J. (2011). A comprehensive model for examining pre-service teachers' knowledge of technology tools for mathematical learning: The T-MATH framework. In L. Paditz, & A. Rogerson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference of the mathematics education into the 21st century project – MEC 21: On turning dreams into reality (pp. 169–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1992). What are cognitive tools? In P. Kommers, D. Jonassen, & J. Mayes (Eds.), Cognitive tools for learning (pp. 1–6). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-77222-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., Carr, C., & Yueh, H. P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43(2), 24–32. doi: 10.1007/BF02818172
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152. doi: 10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
   Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers’ lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6), 887–900. doi: 10.14742/ajet.228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, K., Jamieson-Proctor, R., & Finger, G. (2012). TPACK and pre-service teacher mathematics education: Defining a signature pedagogy for mathematics education using ICT and based on the metaphor “mathematics is a language”. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 207–226. doi: 10.1080/07380569.2012.651424
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Hollebrands, K. (2008). Preparing to teach mathematics with technology: An integrated approach to developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(4), 326–341. Retrieved from www.citejournal.org/volume-8/issue-4-08/mathematics/preparing-to-teach-mathematics-with-technology-an-integrated-approach-to-developing-technological-pedagogical-content-knowledge/.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. Y. (2015). The relationship between pre-service teachers’ geometric reasoning and their van Hiele levels in a Geometer’s Sketchpad environment. Research in Mathematical Education, 19(4), 229–245. doi: 10.7468/jksmed.2015.19.4.229
   Google Scholar
• Lux, N. J., Bangert, A. W., & Whittier, D. B. (2011). The development of an instrument to assess preservice teacher's technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 415–431. doi: 10.2190/EC.45.4.c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayes, J. T. (1992). Mindtools: A suitable case for learning. In P. A. M. Kommers, D. H. Jonassen, & J. T. Mayes (Eds.), Mindtools: Cognitive technologies for modelling knowledge (pp. 7–18). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Driskell, S. O., Kosheleva, O., Pugalee, D., & Weinhold, M. W. (2008). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): Preparation of mathematics teachers for 21st century teaching and learning. In F. Arbaugh, & P. Taylor (Eds.), Inquiry into mathematics teacher education (Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators [AMTE] Monograph 5) (pp. 143–156). San Diego, CA: AMTE.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., van Zee, E. H., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2010). Knowledge growth in teaching mathematics/science with spreadsheets: Moving PCK to TPACK through online professional development. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(2), 42–52. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2010.10784657
   Google Scholar
• Niess, N. L. (2008, March). Mathematics teachers developing technology, pedagogy and content knowledge (TPACK). In K. McFerrin, R. Weber, R. Carlsen, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 5297–5304). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/28121/.
   Google Scholar
• Okumuş, S., Lewis, L., Wiebe, E., & Hollebrands, K. (2016). Utility and usability as factors influencing teacher decisions about software integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(6), 1227–1249. doi: 10.1007/s11423-016-9455-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patahuddin, S., Lowrie, T., & Dalgarno, B. (2016). Analysing mathematics teachers’ TPACK through observation of practice. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5–6), 863–872. doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0305-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polly, D. (2011). Developing teachers’ technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through mathematics professional development. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Radakovic, N., & McDougall, D. (2012). Using dynamic geometry software for teaching conditional probability with area-proportional Venn diagrams. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(7), 949–953. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2011.633628
   Google Scholar
• Ramatlapana, K. (2014). Developing rubrics for TPACK tasks for prospective mathematics teachers: A methodological approach. In M. Lebitso & A. Maclean (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual national congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa (AMESA) (Vol. 1, pp. 198–210). Johannesburg: AMESA.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, J. (2012). Exploring the relationship between teachers prominence in online collaboration and the development of mathematical content knowledge for teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 47–69. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/35351/.
   Google Scholar
• Stols, G. (2012). Does the use of technology make a difference in the geometric cognitive growth of pre-service mathematics teachers? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1233–1247. doi: 10.14742/ajet.799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar, E., Akkaya, A., & Kağizmanli, T. B. (2014). Using dynamic software in mathematics: The case of reflection symmetry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(7), 980–995. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2014.902129
   Google Scholar
• Tokmak, H., Incikabi, L., & Ozgelen, S. (2013). An investigation of change in mathematics, science, and literacy education pre-service teachers’ TPACK. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 407–415. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0040-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge–a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, K., & Ning, L. (2014). Evaluating Chinese pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge of integrating technology in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(1), 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Yigit, M. (2014). A review of the literature: How pre-service mathematics teachers develop their technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 2(1), 26–35. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED548754.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zambak, V. S., & Tyminski, A. M. (2017). A case study on specialised content knowledge development with dynamic geometry software: The analysis of influential factors and technology beliefs of three pre-service middle grades mathematics teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(1), 82–106. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152743.
   Google Scholar
• Zengin, Y., & Tatar, E. (2015). The teaching of polar coordinates with dynamic mathematics software. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(1), 127–139. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2014.904529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar