Mathematically gifted students’ differentiated needs: what kind of support do they need?

References

• Aydemir, D., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2013). Üstün yetenekli ilköğretim öğrencilerinin matematik derslerine ilişkin algıları. Proceedings of the 12th MATDER Semposium, (pp. 266-268), Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Baykoç, N., Aydemir, D., & Uyaroğlu, B. (2014). Inequality in educational opportunities of gifted and talented children in türkiye. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 1133–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.566
   Google Scholar
• Bicknell, B. (2009). Who are the Mathematically Gifted? Student, Parent and Teacher Perspectives. Research in Mathematical Education, 13(1), 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children: The Binet-Simon scale. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B., & Castel, A. (1988). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, D. G. (1990). High ability students who are unpopular with their peers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(4), 155–160. doi: 10.1177/001698629003400405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Thousan Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Davaslıgil, Ü. (2004). Yüksek matematik yeteneğinin erken kestirimi. In M. R. Şirin, A. Kulaksızoğlu, & A. E. Bilgili (Eds.), 1. Türkiye Üstün Yetenekli Çocuklar Kongresi Seçilmiş Bildiriler Kitabı (pp. 263–283). İstanbul: Çocuk Vakfı Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• de Wet, C. F. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs about culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse gifted students (Doctoral dissertation). Storrs: University of Connecticut, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dial, M. F. (2011). The impact of classroom instructional practices in math on achievement or underachievement for academically gifted and talented students (Doctoral dissertation), Walden University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. (2001). The collaboration of mathematically gifted students on challenging tasks. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 7–31. doi: 10.1177/016235320102500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, C. (2011). Provision for mathematically gifted children in primary schools: An Investigation of four different methods of organizational provision. Educational Review, 64(2), 241–260. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2011.598920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fıçıcı, A., & Siegle, D. (2008). International teachers’ judgment of gifted mathematics student characteristics. Journal of Gifted Talented International, 23(1), 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Field, T., Harding, J., Yando, R., & Gonzalez, K. (1998). Feelings and attitudes of gifted students. Adolescence, 33(130), 331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
   Google Scholar
• Freehill, M. (1981). The teacher’s role in gifted and talented education. In W. R. Miles (Ed.), Reserach and Isuues in gifted and Talented education (pp. 9–16). Washington: ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Freiman, V. (2006). Problems to discover and to boost mathematical talent in early grades: A challenging situations approach. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 3(1), 51–75.
   Google Scholar
• Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J., & Cordy, M. (2011). Mathematics for gifted students in an arts- and technology-rich setting. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(3), 397–433. doi: 10.1177/016235321103400303
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Adelson, J. L., Carroll, S. R., Sheffield, L. J., & Spinelli, A. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring mathematical minds-A research-based curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(1), 566–585. doi: 10.4219/jaa-2007-552
   Google Scholar
• Greenes, C. (1981). Identifying the gifted student in mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 28(6), 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, J., James, A., Montelle, C., & Nokes, J. (2011). Meeting the needs of our best and brightest: Curriculum acceleration in tertiary mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(3), 299–312. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2010.543158
   Google Scholar
• Işıksal, M. (2006). A study on pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge regarding the multiplication and division of fractions. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Janos, P. M., Fung, H. C., & Robinson, N. M. (1985). Self-concept, self-esteem, and peer relations among gifted children who feel” different”. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(2), 78–82. doi: 10.1177/001698628502900207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. T. (2000). Teaching mathematics to gifted students in a mixed-ability classroom. Reston, VA: Eric Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, J. L., & Matthews, M. S. (2014). Parenting. In J. A. Plucker, & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 481–492). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kandiko, C. B., & Mawer, M. (2013). Student expectations and perceptions of higher education. London: King’s Learning Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. N. (2004). Where we stand determines the answers to the question: Can the no child left behind legislation be beneficial to gifted students? Roeper Review, 26(3), 124–125. doi: 10.1080/02783190409554256
   Google Scholar
• Krutetski, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ktistis, S. (2014). Fostering critical thinking in gifted students in the heterogeneous classroom: General educators’ perceptions. (Doctoral dissertation, North Central University, San Diego, CA). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No. 3646326).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Thomson, D. T. (2012). Academically gifted students’ perceived interpersonal competence and peer relationships. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(2), 90–104. doi: 10.1177/0016986212442568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loos-Sant'Ana, H., & Trancoso, B. (2014). Socio-emotional development of Brazilian gifted children: Self-beliefs, social skills, and academic performance. Journal of Latino/Latin American Studies, 6(1), 54–65. doi: 10.18085/llas.6.1.g438862334102t30
   Google Scholar
• Maggio, M. R., & Sayler, M. (2013). Trying out acceleration for mathematically talented fifth graders. Gifted Child Today, 36(1), 21–26. doi: 10.1177/1076217512465284
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. R., & Pickett, M. T. (2013). The effects of differentiated instruction on motivation and engagement in fifth-grade gifted math and music students. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541341.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza, C. (2006). Inside today's classrooms: Teacher voices on no child left behind and the education of gifted children. Roeper Review, 29(1), 28–31. doi: 10.1080/02783190609554381
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. C. (1990). Discovering mathematical talent: Model for creative productivity. Connection of Giftedness. University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Mogensen, A. (2011). The proficiency challenge: An action research program on teaching of gifted math students in grades 1-9. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1), 207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (2003). Extreme precocity: Prodigies, savants, and children of extraordinarily high IQ. In N. Coleangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 455–469). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, D. (2016). Design and development of differentiated tasks for 5th and 6th grade mathematically gifted students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ankara: Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Pitta-Pantazi, D. P., Christou, C., Kontoyianni, K., & Kattou, M. (2011). A model of mathematical giftedness: Integrating natural, creative, and mathematical abilities. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(1), 39–54. doi: 10.1080/14926156.2011.548900
   Google Scholar
• Rakow, S. (2012). Helping gifted learners SOAR. Educational Leadership, 69(5), 34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119–130. doi: 10.1002/pits.10144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. (2007). Equity vs. Excellence: Is education still a zerosum game? Peabody Reflector, 76(2), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Rotigel, J. V., & Fello, S. (2004). Mathematically gifted students: How can we meet their needs? Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 46–51. doi: 10.4219/gct-2004-150
   Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? Prufrock Journal, 17(1), 20–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sriraman, B., Haavold, P., & Lee, K. (2013). Mathematical creativity and giftedness: A commentary on and review of theory, new operational views, and ways forward. Mathematics Education, 45(1), 215–225.
   Google Scholar
• Tieso, C. L. (2003). Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore. Roeper Review, 26(1), 29–36. doi: 10.1080/02783190309554236
   Google Scholar
• Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2001). The talent development process: What we know and what we don't know. Gifted Education International, 16(1), 20–28. doi: 10.1177/026142940101600105
   Google Scholar
• Webb, J. T. (1994). Nurturing social emotional development of gifted children. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms. Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Yee, H. C., & Myers, B. K. (2017). Giving gifted students a voice A Proposal to extend United States education Policy Allowing students to challenge the Appropriateness of their education. GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 3, 1.
   Google Scholar