An instructional unit for prospective teachers’ conceptualization of geometric transformations as functions

References

• Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Fuentes, S. R., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2013). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D. J., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. In J. Kaput, A. H. Schoenfeld, E. Dubinsky, & T. P. Dick (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education II (pp. 1–32). Washington, DC: The American Mathematics Society.
   Google Scholar
• Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(3), 247–285. doi: 10.1007/BF02309532
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. P. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education, III (pp. 114–162). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In A. E. Kelly, & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 307–333). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Gravemeijer, K. (2008). Experimenting to support and understanding learning processes. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 68–95). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E., & Harel, G. (1992). The nature of the process conception of function. In G. Harel, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 85–106). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 273–280). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. D. (1991). Children's learning in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(2), 122–137. doi: 10.2307/749589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. D. (1992). A comparison of children’s learning in two interactive computer environments. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 11(1), 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. D. (1997). Exploring the territory before proof: Students’ generalizations in a computer microworld for transformation geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 2(3), 187–215. doi: 10.1023/A:1009711521492
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. D. (2003, February). The nature of mathematics as viewed from cognitive science. Paper presented at the third congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics, Bellaria. Retrieved from https://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~erme/CERME3/Groups/TG1/TG1_edwards_cerme3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fife, J. H., James, K., & Bauer, M. (2019). A learning progression for geometric transformations (Research Report No. RR-19-01). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. doi: 10.1002/ets2.12236
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K. (2001). High school students’ understandings of geometric transformations in the context of a technological environment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, A., & Yanık, H. B. (2016). Geometric translations: An interactive approach based on students’ concept images. North American GeoGebra Journal, 5(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, B. (2001). Students’ reification of geometric transformations in the presence of multiple dynamically-linked representations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa City.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., Roberts, K., & Taylor, C. (2004). What kind of creature is a design experiment? British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 577–590. doi: 10.1080/0141192042000237248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güven, B. (2012). Using dynamic geometry software to improve eight grade students’ understanding of transformation geometry. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(2), 364–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, S. (2003). Enhancing elementary pre-service teachers’ knowledge of geometric transformations through the use of dynamic geometry computer software. In C. Crawford, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for information technology & teacher education International Conference (pp. 2909–2916). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
   Google Scholar
• Hazzan, O., & Goldenberg, P. (1997). Students’ understanding of the notion of function in dynamic geometry environments. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(3), 263–291. doi: 10.1007/BF00182618
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K. F. (2003). High school students’ understandings of geometric transformations in the context of a technological environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1), 55–72. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00004-X
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K. F. (2004). High school students’ intuitive understandings of geometric transformations. Mathematics Teacher, 97(3), 207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 164–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. (1982). Transformation geometry: An introduction to symmetry. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, O. L., & Sinclair, N. (2015). Young children reasoning about symmetry in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM, 47(3), 421–434. doi: 10.1007/s11858-014-0660-5
   Google Scholar
• Portnoy, N., Grundmeier, T. A., & Graham, J. G. (2006). Students’ understanding of mathematical objects in the context of transformational geometry: Implications for constructing and understanding proofs. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(3), 196–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Ramful, A., Ho, S. Y., & Lowrie, T. (2015). Visual and analytical strategies in spatial visualization: Perspectives from bilateral symmetry and reflection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 443–470. doi: 10.1007/s13394-015-0144-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seago, N., Nikula, J., Matassa, M., & Jacobs, J. (2012). A transformations-based approach to learning and teaching similarity. In Proceedings for the 12th international congress on mathematics education (pp. 2298–2304). Seoul.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Phillips, D. C., Towne, L., & Feuer, M. J. (2003). On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 25–28. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032001025
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L. P., & Ulrich, C. (2014). Constructivist teaching experiment. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 102–109). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steketee, S., & Scher, D. (2011). A geometric path to the concepts of function. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 17(1), 48–57. doi: 10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.17.1.0048
   Google Scholar
• Tatar, E., Akkaya, A., & Kağızmanlı, T. B. (2014). Using dynamic software in mathematics: The case of reflection symmetry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(7), 980–995. doi: 10.1080/0020739X.2014.902129
   Google Scholar
• Thaqi, X., Gimenez, J., & Rosich, N. (2011, February). Geometrical transformation as viewed by prospective teachers. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 578–587). Poland: Univerity of Rszeszów.
   Google Scholar
• Trigueros, M., & Ursini, S. (1999, July). Does the understanding of variable evolve through schooling? In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 273–280). Haifa: Israel Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Turgut, M. (2019). Sense-making regarding matrix representation of geometric transformations in R2: A semiotic mediation perspective in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11858-019-01032-0
   Google Scholar
• Yanık, H. B. (2006). Prospective elementary teachers’ growth in knowledge and understanding of rigid geometric transformations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Yanık, H. B. (2011). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ preconceptions of geometric translations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(2), 231–260. doi: 10.1007/s10649-011-9324-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanık, H. B. (2013). Learning geometric translations in a dynamic geometry environment. Education and Science, 38(168), 272–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanık, H. B. (2014). Middle-school students’ concept images of geometric translations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36(1), 33–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Yanık, H. B., & Flores, A. (2009). Understanding rigid geometric transformations: Jeff’s learning path for translation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 28(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Yao, X., & Manouchehri, A. (2019). Middle school students’ generalizations about properties of geometric transformations in a dynamic geometry environment. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar