The impact of improving feelings of relatedness on motivation and engagement for tertiary students

References

• Australian Government. (2017). Attrition, success and retention. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/documents/2017-section-15-attrition-success-and-retention
   Google Scholar
• Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853–874. doi: 10.1007/s11162-011-9221-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62(1), 119–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325–346. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., & Boucher, A. R. (2015). Optimizing the power of choice: Supporting student autonomy to foster motivation and engagement in learning. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(2), 87–91. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588. doi: 10.1037/a0019682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150. doi: 10.1037/a0026253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. doi: 10.1177/1477878509104318
   Google Scholar
• Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Journal of Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–203). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press..
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579. doi: 10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2009). How K-12 teachers can put self-determination theory principles into practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 145–154. doi: 10.1177/1477878509104319
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. doi: 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Hardre, P., & Omura, M. (2002). Providing a rationale in an autonomy-supportive way as a strategy to motivate others during an uninteresting activity. Motivation and Emotion, 26(3), 183–207. doi: 10.1023/a:1021711629417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RStudio Team. (2015). RStudio: Integrated development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio. Retrieved from http://www.rstudio.com, 42
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2017). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115–126. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar