High school mathematics teachers’ content knowledge of the logical structure of proof deriving from figural-concept interaction in geometry

References

• Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2005). Proof validation in real analysis: Inferring and checking warrants. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D., & Campbell, C. (2004). Fostering the development of mathematical thinking: Observations from a proofs course. Primus, 14(4), 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970408984098
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., Hill, H., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(3), 14–22. 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bradis, V. M., Minkovskii, V. L., & Kharcheva, A. K. (1999). Lapses in mathematical reasoning. Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research method in education (4th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, T., & Hadas, N. (1987). Euclid may stay and even be taught. In M. M. Lindquist & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), Learning and teaching geometry, K-12 (pp. 47–58). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Durand-Guerrier, V., Boero, P., Douek, N., Epp, S. S., & Tanguay, D. (2012). Examining the role of logic in teaching proof. In G. Hanna, & M. de Villiers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education: The ICMI study (pp. 369–389). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2007). Cognitive functioning and the understanding of mathematical processes of proof. In P. Boero (Ed.), Theorems in school: From history, epistemology, and cognition to classroom practice (pp. 137–161). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Epp, S. S. (2003). The role of logic in teaching proof. The American Mathematical Monthly, 110(10), 886–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2003.11920029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetisov, A. I. ([1954] (2012)). Proof in geometry. Bound with Y. S. Dubnov: [1955] Mistakes in Geometric Proofs. Mineola, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273689
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., & Kedem, I. (1982). Proof and certitude in the development of mathematics thinking. In A. Vermandel (Ed.), Proceedings of the sixth international conference for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 128–131). Universitaire Installing Antwerpen.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., & Nachlieli, T. (1998). Concepts and figures in geometrical reasoning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1193–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harel, G. (2002). The development of mathematical induction as a proof scheme: A model for DNR-based instruction. In S. Campbell & R. Zaskis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 185–212). Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805–842). NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (1997). Student-teachers’ conceptions of mathematical proof. Mathematics Education Review, 9, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. (2002). Secondary school mathematics teachers’ conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/749097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, M. V., & Pedemonte, B. (2014). Relationship between inductive arithmetic argumentation and deductive algebraic proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(1), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9530-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrone, S. S., & Martin, T. S. (2004). Assessing high school students’ understanding of geometric proof. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150409556607
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education, Republic of Turkey (MoNE). (2013). Ortaöğretim Matematik Dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. Sınıflar) Öğretim Programı [Republic of Turkey, Ministry of National Education secondary school mathematics curriculum (9, 10, 11 and 12. grades].
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki, M., Fujita, T., & Jones, K. (2017). Students’ understanding of the structure of deductive proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9720-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 4–36. http://www.nctm.org/publications/jrme.aspx https://doi.org/10.2307/30034698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2008). Overcoming students’ difficulties in learning to understand and construct proofs. In M. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 95–110). Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(96)90036-X
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9077-9
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2008). Proof in school mathematics: Insights from psychological research into students’ ability for deductive reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(2), 103–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701854425
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J., Stylianides, G. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2004). Undergraduate students’ understanding of the contraposition equivalence rule in symbolic and verbal contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000017671.47700.0b
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Philippou, G. N. (2007). Preservice teachers’ knowledge of proof by mathematical induction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10, 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9034-z
   Google Scholar
• Ubuz, B., & Yayan, B. (2010). Primary teachers’ subject matter knowledge: Decimals. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(6), 787–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207391003777871
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, 306–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2010.495468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2005). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar