Is it the width, the height, or the length?: pre-service teachers’ responses to a volume task

References

• Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista, M. (2004). Applying cognition-based assessment to elementary school students’ development of understanding of area and volume measurement. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_6
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M., & Clements, D. (1996). Students’ understanding of three-dimensional rectangular arrays of cubes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 258–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/749365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baturo, A., & Nason, R. (1996). Student teachers’ subject matter knowledge within the domain of area measurement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(3), 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00376322
   Google Scholar
• Curry, M., Mitchelmore, M., & Outhred, L. (2006, July 16–21). Development of children’s understanding of length, area, and volume measurement principles. Paper presented at the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Prague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, D. S., Choi, K. M., Runnalls, C., & Hwang, J. (2018). Do textbooks address known learning challenges in area measurement? A Comparative Analysis. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(3), 325–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0238-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, D. S., Choi, K. M., Runnalls, C., & Hwang, J. (2019). How well aligned are common core textbooks to students’ development in area measurement? School Science and Mathematics, 119(5), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, D. S., & Runnalls, C. (2019). Filling in the Gaps. Teaching Children Mathematics, 25(5), 274–280. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.25.5.0274
   Google Scholar
• Hong, D. S., & Runnalls, C. (2020). Understanding length × width × height with modified tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 614–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1583383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, C., O'Meara, N., & Walsh, R. (2019). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ use of the mathematics register. Issues in Educational Research, 29(3), 790–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). The TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C. (2012). The role of subject knowledge in primary prospective teachers’ approaches to teaching the topic of area. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(3), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9194-8
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
   Google Scholar
• Runnalls, C., & Hong, D. S. (2019). “Well, they understand the concept of area”: Pre-service teachers’ responses to student area misconceptions. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00274-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runnalls, C., & Hong, D. S. (2020). Half the base or half the height?: Exploring a student’s justification of 1/2 × base × height. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 604–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1576928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarama, J., & Clements, D. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., Males, L. M., & Gonulates, F. (2016). Conceptual limitations in curricular presentations of area measurement: One nation’s challenges. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(4), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1219930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin-Sitrava, R., & Isiksal-Bostan, M. (2016). The nature of middle school mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge: TheCase of volume of prisms. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 12(1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09751122.2016.11890409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin-Sitrava, R., & Isiksal-Bostan, M. (2018). The nature of middle school mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge: The case of the volume of prisms. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 74(1), 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyeva, M., Ganley, C. M., Casey, B. M., Dulaney, A., Tillinger, M., & Anderson, K. (2013). How children determine the size of 3D structures: Investigating factors influencing strategy choice. Cognition and Instruction, 31(1), 29–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.742086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharos, K. (2006). Prevailing educational practices for area measurement and students’ failure in measuring areas. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(3), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.09.003
   Google Scholar