Enrichment in school principals’ ways of seeing mathematics

References

• Abazaoglu, I., & Aztekin, S. (2016). The role of teacher morale and motivation on students’ science and math achievement: Findings from Singapore, Japan, Finland and Turkey. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(11), 2606–2617. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041114
   Google Scholar
• Al-Murani, T., Kilhamn, C., Morgan, D., & Watson, A. (2019). Opportunities for learning: The use of variation to analyse examples of a paradigm shift in teaching primary mathematics in England. Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1511460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. S., & Piazza, J. A. (1996). Changing beliefs: Teaching and learning mathematics in constructivist preservice classrooms. Action in Teacher Education, 18(2), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.1996.10462833
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Baillie, C., Emanuelsson, J., & Marton, F. (2001). Building knowledge about the interface. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 32(3–4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00111-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsiger, P., & Lambelet, A. (2014). Participant observation. In D. della Porta (Ed.), Methodological practices in social movement research (pp. 144–172). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bicknell, B., & Hunter, R. (2009). Explorations of year 6 to year 7 transition in numeracy. In Ministry of Education (Ed.), Findings from the New Zealand numeracy development projects (pp. 98–109). Learning Media Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiler, S. K. (2015). Increasing awareness of practice through interaction across communities: The lived experiences of a mathematician and mathematics teacher educator. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9275-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boberg, J. E., & Bourgeois, S. J. (2016). The effects of integrated transformational leadership on achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston, M. D., Henrick, E. C., Gibbons, L. K., Berebitsky, D., & Colby, G. T. (2017). Investigating how to support principals as instructional leaders in mathematics. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 12(3), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775116640254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Brez, C. C., & Allen, J. J. (2016). Adults’ views on mathematics education: A Midwest sample. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 155–160.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., & Smith, M. (1997). Supporting the development of mathematics pedagogy. Mathematics Teacher, 90(2), 138–143.
   Google Scholar
• Burrill, G. (2014). Preparing future teachers to teach statistics. In K. Makar, B. de Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on teaching statistics (ICOTS9, July 2014). International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Burrill, G., & Biehler, R. (2011). Fundamental statistical ideas in the school curriculum and in training teachers. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics—challenges for teaching and teacher education – A joint ICMI/IASE Study: The 18th ICMI study (pp. 57–69). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P. F., & White, D. (1997). Project IMPACT: Influencing and supporting teacher change in predominantly minority schools. In E. Fennema & B. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 309–355). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cassel, D., & Vincent, D. (2011). Metaphors reveal preservice elementary teachers’ views of mathematics and science teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 111(7), 319–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00094.x
   Google Scholar
• Cerrato, E. (2019). Illuminating changes in preservice teachers’ perceptions about teaching elementary mathematics in an introductory methods course (Order No. 13858111). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2240090025). http://matematikdidaktik.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Madif11_webb-002.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, H., Lipscomb, S., & Gill, B. (2016). Is school value-added indicative of principal quality? Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Jackson, K. (2011). Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 6–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Jackson, K., Henrick, E., & Smith, T. M. (2018). Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and student achievement: What the research says. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., & Orr, M. T. (2009). Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Darragh, L. (2018). Loving and loathing: Portrayals of school mathematics in young adult fiction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, N. (2001). The professional development of school principals: A fine balance. Professorial Lecture, Griffith University Public Lecture Series Griffith University, Brisbane, May 24.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Teacher evaluation reform: Policy lessons for school principals. Principal’s Research Review, 9(5), 1–8. National Association of Secondary School Principals.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. (1991). The enlightened eye. Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, J. (2001). En fråga om frågor. Hur lärares frågor i klassrummet gör det möjligt att få reda på elevernas sätt att förstå det som undervisningen behandlar i matematik och naturvetenskap. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis [A question about questions. How teachers' questioning makes it possible to learn about the students' ways of understanding the content taught in mathematics and science; in Swedish with summary in English]. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 168.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuelsson, J., & Sahlström, F. (2008). The price of participation: Teacher control versus student participation in classroom interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 52(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830801915853
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1989). The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest (Ed.), Mathematics teaching: The state of the art (pp. 249–254). Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1996). Popularisation: Myths, mass media and modernism. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 785–817). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Tan, H. (2014). Public views on the gendering of mathematics and related careers: International comparisons. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9550-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, A. (2018). Becoming an instructional leader for elementary mathematics: Transforming principal learning through a research-practice partnership [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington]. University of Washington Digital Library. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/42089
   Google Scholar
• Fülöp, É. (2019). Learning to solve problems that you have not learned to solve: Strategies in mathematical problem solving. Doctoral Theses from University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, M. G., Ashton, P. T., & Algina, J. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs about teaching and learning in mathematics: An intervention study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokçe, F. (2009). Behaviour of Turkish elementary school principals in the change process: An analysis of the perceptions of both teachers and school principals. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37(2), 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143208100298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, G., Rösken, B., & Törner, G. (2009). Beliefs—No longer a hidden variable in mathematical and learning processes. In W. Schlöglmann & J. Maasz (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results (pp. 1–18). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2015). Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714523831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2015). High-impact leadership. Educational Leadership, 72(5), 36–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Sinclair, N., Chval, K. B., Clements, D. H., Civil, M., Pape, S. J., Stephan, M., Wanko, J. J., & Wilkerson, T. L. (2016). Positioning mathematics education researchers to influence storylines. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.2.0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, C., & Schoeman, W. G. (2015). Practice-oriented research in service of designing interventions. Acta Theologica, 22(3), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v21i1.4S
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hochbein, C., & Cunningham, B. C. (2013). An exploratory analysis of the longitudinal impact of principal change on elementary school achievement. Journal of School Leadership, 23(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461302300103
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist Olander, M., & Nyberg, E. (2014). Learning study guided by variation theory: Exemplified by children learning to halve and double whole numbers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28(2), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2014.884030
   Google Scholar
• Huang, R., & Li, Y. (Eds.). (2017). Teaching and learning mathematics through variation: Confucian heritage meets Western theories. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hussin, S., & Al Abri, S. (2015). Professional development needs of school principals in the context of educational reform. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 7(4), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS2015.0391
   Google Scholar
• Innabi, H. (2006). The perceptions of UAE principals regarding the new vision of teaching mathematics. Studies in Curriculum and Instruction, 113, 61–84.
   Google Scholar
• Innabi, H. (2009, September 11–17). A model to develop mathematics education: Modify the public traditional perceptions of mathematics-case of UAE schools' principals. In L. Paditz & A. Rogerson (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Models in Developing Mathematics Education, Dresden, Saxony, Germany (pp. 262–266).
   Google Scholar
• Innabi, H., & El Sheikh, O. (2007). The change in mathematics teachers' perceptions of critical thinking after 15 years of educational reform in Jordan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9017-x
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. (2013). The human factor. Educational Leadership, 70(7), 16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, J. (2003). A model for assessment-driven professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 751–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170308401008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koffka, K. (1935/1963). Principles of gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., enlarged). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., Björklund, C., Brkovic, I., & Runesson Kempe, U. (2020). Effects of learning addition and subtraction in preschool by making the first ten numbers and their relations visible with finger patterns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09927-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., Mårtensson, P., & Runesson, U. (2016). What is to be learned? Teachers’ collective inquiry into the object of learning. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1119725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., Runesson Kempe, U., & Marton, F. (2017). What is made possible to learn when using the variation theory of learning in teaching mathematics? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(4), 559–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0858-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullberg, A., & Skodras, C. (2018). Systematic variation in examples in mathematics teaching. In C. Osbeck, A. Ingerman, & S. Claesson (Eds.), Didactic classroom studies: A potential research direction (pp. 47–67). Nordic Akademic Press, Kapitel.
   Google Scholar
• Kutaka, T. S., Ren, L., Smith, W. M., Beattie, H. L., Edwards, C. P., Green, J. L., Chernyavskiy, P., Stroup, W., Heaton, R. M., & Lewis, W. J. (2018). Examining change in K-3 teachers’ mathematical knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs: The case of primarily math. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9355-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambersky, J. (2016). Understanding the human side of school leadership: Principals’ impact on teachers’ morale, self-efficacy, stress, and commitment. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(4), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2016.1181188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamichhane, K. (2016). Individuals with visual impairments teaching in Nepal’s mainstream schools: A model for inclusion. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1073374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latterell, C. M., & Wilson, J. L. (2012). Students’ perceptions of what mathematicians do. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n3p431
   Google Scholar
• Latterell, C. M., & Wilson, J. L. (2016). Math is like a lion hunting a sleeping gazelle: Preservice elementary teachers’ metaphors of mathematics. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 283–292.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment: Evidence from a Singapore sample. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215578448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, F. K. Jr. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 244–278.
   Google Scholar
• Lester, J. B., & Grant, C. M. (2001). Mathematics supervision through a new lens. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 60–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljedahl, P. (2011). The theory of conceptual change as a theory for changing conceptions. Nordisk Matematikkdidaktikk, 16(1–2), 101–124.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. S. (1999). Public images of mathematics [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C. S., & Ernest, P. (2000). A survey of public images of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education Journal, 2(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520076
   Google Scholar
• Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Göteborgs Universitet, Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.
   Google Scholar
• Mangin, M. M. (2007). Facilitating elementary principals’ support for instructional teacher leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 319–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07299438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovits, Z., & Forgasz, H. (2017). Mathematics is like a lion’: Elementary students beliefs about mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9759-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2006). Sameness and difference in transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F. (2015). Necessary conditions of learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Häggström, J. (2017). Teaching through variation: A European perspective. In R. Huang & Y. Li (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics through variation: Confucian heritage meets western theories (pp. 389–406). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Pang, M. F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 193–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, M., Lipscomb, S., Chiang, H., & Gill, B. (2016). Do principals’ professional practice ratings reflect their contributions to student achievement? Evidence from Pennsylvania’s framework for leadership (Working Paper 46). Mathematical Policy Research, Inc., Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• McDuffie, A. R., & Graeber, A. O. (2003). Institutional norms and policies that influence college mathematics professors in the process of changing to reform-based practices. School Science and Mathematics, 103(7), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18210.x
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, C., Molefe, A., Brandt, W. C., Zhou, B., & Dhillon, S. (2016). Impact results of the eMINTS professional development validation study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716638446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L. S., Pluska, H., Moorcroft, S., Jeffrey, A., & Woodard, S. (2014). Educators’ perceptions and knowledge of the common core state standards. Issues in Teacher Education, 22(2), 47–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nanna, R. J. (2016). Public conceptions of algorithms and representations in the common core state standards for mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 25(Special Issue), 29–51.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Elementary Schools Principals (NAESP). (2002). What principals need to know about teaching math.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors’ Association (NGA) Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School. (2010). Common core state standards.
   Google Scholar
• NCTM Research Committee. (2018). Asset-based approaches to equitable mathematics education research and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, B. S., & Sassi, A. (2005). The effective principal: Instructional readership for high quality learning. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, B. S., Stimson, V. C., & Jordan, W. J. (2007). Leadership content knowledge for mathematics of staff engaged in key school leadership functions [Paper presentation]. University Council of Education Administration Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, S., & Warren, E. (2000). Primary school teachers’ beliefs relating to mathematics, teaching and assessing mathematics and factors that influence these beliefs. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2, 34–47.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Principals’ Council. (2009). The principal as mathematics leader series: Leading student achievement series. SAGE Publishing, Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Oster, E., Graudgenett, N., McGlamery, S., & Topp, N. (1999). How to avoid common problems and misunderstandings of the NCTM standards. Education, 120(2), 397–400.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F. (2019). Enhancing the generative learning of young people in the domain of financial literacy through learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(3), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2018-0065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, M. F., & Ling, L. (2012). Learning study: Helping teachers to use theory, develop professionally and produce new knowledge to be shared. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 40(3), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9191-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelfrey, R. (2006). Mathematics program improvement review: A comprehensive evaluation process for K-12 schools. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Perry, R. R., Finkelstein, N. D., Seago, N., Heredia, A., Sobolew-Shubin, S., & Carroll, C. (2015). Taking stock of common core math implementation: Supporting teachers to shift instruction: Insights from the math in common 2015 baseline survey of teachers and administrators. WestEd.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, I. (1996). Search for new mathematics. The Mathematics Forum. http://forum.swarthmore.edu/social/articles/ivars.html
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, K. (2002). The professional development of principals: Innovations and opportunities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02382006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, D. R., Son, S. H., File, N., & Froiland, J. M. (2012). Changes in parent involvement across the transition from public school prekindergarten to first grade and children’s academic outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(2), 276–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/667726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffitt-White, R. (2017). Putting teachers first: Leading change through design—Initiating and sustaining effective teaching of mathematics. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 73(1), 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, D. M. (2002). The impact of principal leadership behaviors on instructional practice and student engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(5), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210440294
   Google Scholar
• Reed, K. E., Goldsmith, L. T., & Nelson, B. S. (2006). Elementary and middle school teachers’ perceptions of their principals’ instructional leadership in mathematics: Preliminary results [Paper presentation]. Research Pre-Session of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, St. Louis, MO, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Reeder, S., Utley, J., & Cassel, D. (2009). Using metaphors as a tool for examining preservice elementary teachers’ beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 109(5), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18093.x
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G., Larbi-Cherif, A., Rosenquist, B. A., Sharpe, C. J., Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2017). Administrator observation and feedback: Does it lead toward improvement in inquiry-oriented math instruction? Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 475–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16687006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. (1999, August 24–28). Teaching as constituting a space of variation [Paper presentation]. 8th EARLI conference, Göteborg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ryve, A., Larsson, M., & Nilsson, P. (2013). Analyzing content and participation in classroom discourse: Dimensions of variation, mediating tools, and conceptual accountability. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.628689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifter, D., Russell, S. J., & Bastable, V. (1999). Teaching to the big ideas. In M. Z. Solomon (Ed.), The diagnostic teacher: Constructing new approaches to professional development (pp. 114–201). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seaman, C. E., Szydlik, J. E., Szydlik, S. D., & Beam, J. E. (2005). A comparison of preservice elementary teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and teaching mathematics: 1968 and 1998. School Science and Mathematics, 105(4), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18158.x
   Google Scholar
• Sheffield, L. J. (2017). Dangerous myths about ‘gifted’ mathematics students. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 49(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0814-8
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. National Staff Development Council.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., & Spillane, J. (2005). What can researchers on educational leadership learn from research on teaching? Building a bridge. In W. A. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 28–45). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, M. L., Chval, K. B., Wanko, J. J., Civil, M., Fish, M. C., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Konold, C., & Wilkerson, T. L. (2015). Grand challenges and opportunities in mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.2.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterenberg, G. (2008). Investigating teachers’ images of mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9062-8
   Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H., Richard, H. B., & Catano, N. (2008). Qualities of effective principals. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development (ASCD).
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509353043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. Y. (2018). Examining school leadership effects on student achievement: The role of contextual challenges and constraints. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1221885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127–146). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G., Philipp, R. A., Thompson, P. W., & Boyd, B. (1994). Calculational and conceptual orientations in teaching mathematics. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 79–92). NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• To, K. K., & Pang, M. F. (2019). A study of variation theory to enhance students’ genre awareness and learning of genre features. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 8(3), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-10-2018-0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014). The impact of principal perception on student academic climate and achievement in high school: How does it measure up? Journal of School Leadership, 24(2), 386–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461402400207
   Google Scholar
• Urick, A., Wilson, A. S. P., Ford, T. G., Frick, W. C., & Wronowski, M. L. (2018). Testing a framework of math progress indicators for ESSA: How opportunity to learn and instructional leadership matter. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(3), 396–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18761343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viholainen, A., Asikainen, M., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2014). Mathematics student teachers’ epistemological beliefs about the nature of mathematics and the goals of mathematics teaching and learning in the beginning of their studies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1028a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White-Fredette, K. (2010). Why not philosophy? Problematizing the philosophy of mathematics in a time of curriculum reform. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 21–30. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.361.4387&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yeliz, T. D. (2016). Effective learning environment characteristics as a requirement of constructivist curricula: Teachers’ needs and school principals’ views. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9213a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, P. (2007). How elementary principals’ beliefs and actions influence new teachers’ experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 101–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06293629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, P., & Bruce, K. M. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02239642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar