On the density of ℚ in ℝ: Imaginary dialogues scripted by undergraduate students

References

• Bartle, R. G., & Sherbert, D. R. (2011). Introduction to real analysis (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (2018). Difficult dialogs about degenerate cases: A proof script study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchbinder, O. (2018). Who is right? – What students’ and prospective teachers’ responses to scripted dialog reveal about their conceptions of proof. In R. Zazkis, & P. Herbst (Eds.), Scripting approaches in mathematics education: Mathematical dialogues in research and practice (pp. 89–113). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buchbinder, O., & Cook, A. (2018). Examining the mathematical knowledge for teaching of proving in scenarios written by pre-service teachers. In O. Buchbinder, & S. Kuntze (Eds.), Mathematics teachers engaging with representations of practice: A dynamically evolving field (pp. 131–154). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. P. (2018). Monster-barring as a catalyst for bridging secondary algebra to abstract algebra. In N. H. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 47–70). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Courant, R., & John, F. (2012). Introduction to calculus and analysis I. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95–123). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS-based analysis: Part 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(3), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-2531-z
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E., & Yiparaki, O. (2000). On student understanding of AE and EA quantification. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research in collegiate mathematics education IV (Vol. 8, pp. 239–289). American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Eraslan, A. (2008). The notion of reducing abstraction in quadratic functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(8), 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802136594
   Google Scholar
• González-Martín, A. S., Giraldo, V., & Souto, A. M. (2013). The introduction of real numbers in secondary education: An institutional analysis of textbooks. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(3), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.803778
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K. (1998). Developmental research as a research method. In A. Sierpinska, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (Vol. 4, pp. 277–295). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guven, B, Cekmez, E., & Karatas, I. (2011). Examining preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ understandings about irrational numbers. PRIMUS, 21(5), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970903256928
   Google Scholar
• Hazzan, O. (1999). Reducing abstraction level when learning abstract algebra concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003780613628
   Google Scholar
• Hazzan, O. (2003). How students attempt to reduce abstraction in the learning of mathematics and in the learning of computer science. Computer Science Education, 13(2), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.13.2.95.14202
   Google Scholar
• Hazzan, O., & Hadar, I. (2005). Reducing abstraction when learning graph theory. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(3), 255–272.
   Google Scholar
• Hazzan, O., & Zazkis, R. (2005). Reducing abstraction: The case of school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-3335-x
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K. F. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 164–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Nardi, E. (2005). On the pedagogical insight of mathematicians: ‘Interaction’ and ‘transition from the concrete to the abstract’. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2005.03.005
   Google Scholar
• Kontorovich, I., & Zazkis, R. (2016). Turn vs. shape: Teachers cope with incompatible perspectives on angle. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9699-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malara, N. (2001). From fractions to rational numbers in their structure: Outlines for an innovative didactical strategy and the question of density. In J. Novotná (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference of the European society for research mathematics education II (pp. 35–46). Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Pedagogická Faculta.
   Google Scholar
• Mamolo, A. (2018). Eyes, ears, and expectations: Scripting as a multi-lens tool. In R. Zazkis, & P. Herbst (Eds.), Scripting approaches in mathematics education: Mathematical dialogues in research and practice (pp. 229–248). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mamolo, A., & Zazkis, R. (2014). Contextual considerations in probabilistic situations: An aid or a hindrance? In E. Chernoff, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 641–656). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_34
   Google Scholar
• Marmur, O., & Zazkis, R. (2018). Space of fuzziness: Avoidance of deterministic decisions in the case of the inverse function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9843-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Armella, L. (2014). An essential tension in mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(4), 621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0580-4
   Google Scholar
• Murray, E., & Baldinger, E. E. (2018). Impact of abstract algebra on teachers’ understanding of and approaches to instruction in solving equations. In N. H. Wasserman (Ed.), Connecting abstract algebra to secondary mathematics, for secondary mathematics teachers (pp. 403–429). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning cultures and computers. Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, D. (1993). From should to could: Reflections on possibilities of mathematics teacher education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 13(2), 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Raychaudhuri, D. (2014). Adaptation and extension of the framework of reducing abstraction in the case of differential equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.790503
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302715
   Google Scholar
• Sirotic, N., & Zazkis, R. (2007). Irrational numbers: The gap between formal and intuitive knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9041-5
   Google Scholar
• Subedi, K. P. (2014). Dealing with abstraction: Reducing abstraction in teaching (RAiT) [Doctoral dissertation]. Simon Fraser University. http://summit.sfu.ca/item/14434
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305619
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2004). Understanding the structure of the set of rational numbers: A conceptual change approach. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2007). How many numbers are there in a rational numbers’ interval? Constraints, synthetic models and the effect of the number line. In S. Vosniadou, A. Baltas, & X. Vamvakoussi (Eds.), Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction (pp. 265–282). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., & Vosniadou, S. (2010). How many decimals are there between two fractions? Aspects of secondary school students’ understanding of rational numbers and their notation. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370001003676603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvakoussi, X., Vosniadou, S., & Van Dooren, W. (2013). The framework theory approach applied to mathematics learning. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 305–321). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image, and the notion of function. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 14(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739830140305
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wijeratne, C., & Zazkis, R. (2015). On Painter's paradox: Contextual and mathematical approaches to infinity. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(2), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0004-z
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematical education. In I. Harel, & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–203). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, D. (2014). Proof-scripts as a lens for exploring students’ understanding of odd/even functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 35, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, D., & Villanueva, M. (2016). Student conceptions of what it means to base a proof on an informal argument. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics, 2(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0032-3
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R. (2018). Dialogues on numbers: Script-writing as approximation of practice. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 749–767). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_42
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Herbst, P. (Eds.). (2018). Scripting approaches in mathematics education: Mathematical dialogues in research and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62692-5
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2007). Generating examples: From pedagogical tool to a research tool. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Marmur, O. (2018). Scripting tasks as a springboard for extending prospective teachers' example spaces: A case of generating functions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(4), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0019-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R., & Zazkis, D. (2014). Script writing in the mathematics classroom: Imaginary conversations on the structure of numbers. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.876157
   Google Scholar