Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: an action research

References

• Aizikovitsh, E., & Amit, M. (2010). Evaluating an infusion approach to the teaching of critical thinking skills through mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3818–3822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.596
   Google Scholar
• Alkhateeb, M. A. (2019). Assessing eighth-grade mathematics teachers and textbook in embodying thinking levels. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12125a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Animasaun, I. L., & Abegunrin, O. A. (2017). Gender difference, self-efficacy, active learning strategies and academic achievement of undergraduate students in the Department of Mathematical Sciences, Federal University of Technology, Akure. Nigeria. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 8(4), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2017.088929
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2003). The teaching of proof. arXiv preprint math/0305021.
   Google Scholar
• Baugh, J. (2002). Integrating critical thinking skills into the mathematics curriculum of the Maricopa Community Colleges [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University].
   Google Scholar
• Bektaş, M., & Horzum, M. B. (2014). Otantik öğrenme [Authentic Learning], (Ata, B. editörlüğünde). Pegem Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, B. (1991). Practical strategies for the direct teaching of thinking skills. In A. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds (pp. 145–150). ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, A. C. (1998). Critical thinking through estimation. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(8), 452–456.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Butera, G., Friesen, A., Palmer, S. B., Lieber, J., Horn, E. M., Hanson, M. J., & Czaja, C. (2014). Integrating mathematics problem solving and critical thinking in to the curriculum. Young Children, 69(1), 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M. (2019). Preparing our students to read and understand mathematics. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 9(1), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201901.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callison, D., & Lamb, A. (2004). Keywords in instruction: Authentic learning. School Library Monthly, 21(4), 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. J. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9179-7
   Google Scholar
• Cholewinski, M. (2009). An introduction to constructivism and authentic activity. Journal of the School of Contemporary International Studies Novaga University of Foreign Studies, 42(2), 163–173.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, J. D., & O’Hair, M. J. (2010). Overcoming obstacles in using authentic instruction: A comparative case study of high school math & science teachers. American Secondary Education, 38(2), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/41406158
   Google Scholar
• Ediger, M. (2009). Mathematics: Content and pedagogy. College Student Journal, 43(3), 714–717.
   Google Scholar
• Ennis, H. R. (1991). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum. In A. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds (pp. 68–71). ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Enright, B. E., & Beattie, S. A. (1992). Assessing critical thinking in mathematics. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 17, 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/153450849201700205
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, H. L. (2007). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firdaus, F., Kailani, I., Bakar, M. N. B., & Bakry, B. (2015). Developing critical thinking skills of students in mathematics learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v9i3.1830
   Google Scholar
• Forman, S. L., & Steen, L.A. (1995). Mathematics for work and life. In I. M. Carl (Ed.), Prospects for school mathematics (pp. 219–241). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9070-8
   Google Scholar
• Gatlin, L., & Edwards, R. (2007). Promoting authentic learning through a paceful and positive perspective. Journal of Authentic Learning, 4(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Glazer, E. (2001). Using Internet primary sources to teach critical thinking skills in mathematics. Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing test items to evaluate higher order thinking. Allyn& Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J. (2006). Authentic e-learning in higher education: Design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks. In: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (E-LEARN), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Researchand Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innabi, H., & El Sheikh, O. (2006). The change in mathematics teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking after 15 years of educational Reform in Jordan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9017-x
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 567–605). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchener, K. (2008). Mathematics, football and music: Developing critical thinking skills in students. Mathematics in School, 37(1), 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kocak, Z. F., Bozan, R., & Işık, Ö. (2009). The importance of group work in mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2363–2365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.414
   Google Scholar
• Konobloch, N. A. (2003). Is experimental learning authentic? Journal of Agricultural Education, 44(4), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2003.04022
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(2007), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Makina, A. (2010). The role of visualization in developing critical thinking in mathematics. Perspectives in Education, 28(1), 24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcut, I. (2005). Critical thinking-applied to the methodology of teaching mathematics. Educatia Matematica, 1(1), 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Merrill/PrenticeHall.
   Google Scholar
• Miri, B., David, B. C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M. (1990). Higherorder thinking in teaching social studies. A rationale for the assesstment of classroom thoughtfulness. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., & Weglage, G. G. (1993). Five standarts for authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicaise, M., Gibney, T., & Crane, M. (2000). Toward an understanding of authentic learning: Student perceptions of an authentic classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009477008671
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. (2001). An overview of methodological approach of action research. In R. Richardson (Ed.), Theory and practice of action research. João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba (English version). Available online. Accessed on September 09, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J., Maor, D., & Herrington, J. (2013). Authentic online learning: Aligning learner needs, pedagogy and technology. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 227.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1995). Critical thinking: Identifying the targets. In J. Willsen, & A. J. A. Binker (Eds.), Critical thinking: How to prepare students for a rapidly changing world (pp. 17–36). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2001). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your learning and your life. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, E. E. (2012). Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5(3), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMCSR11.161
   Google Scholar
• Preus, B. (2012). Authentic instruction for 21st century learning: Higher order thinking in an inclusive school. American Secondary Education, 40(3), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/43694141
   Google Scholar
• Reid, D. (2005, February). The meaning of proof in mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 458–468).
   Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters and how to get it. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, A. C. (2006). Editorial: The components of authentic learning. Journal of Authentic Learning, 3(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, M. (2009). A mathematical program to develop the skills of thinking of children. Sistemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 7(5), 84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. E. (2006). Learning math takes attitude, perseverance, and courage. The Education Digest, 71(7), 50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 289–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, J. (2010). Leveraging cognitive technology tools to expand opportunities for critical thinking in elementary mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(3), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, C. (2002, July). Reflective diaries as a means of facilitating and assessing reflection. In Quality conversations: Proceedings of the 29th HERDSA Annual Conference Perth (pp. 7–10).
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. W., & Edwards, C. (eds.). (2014). Action research: Models, methods, and examples. Information Age Publising.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., & Wing Jan, L. (1993). Thinking for themselves. Eleanor Curtin Publishing.
   Google Scholar