Partially-automated individualized assessment of higher education mathematics

References

• Australian Council of Deans of Science. (2013). Mathematical sciences standards statement and threshold learning outcomes. Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Beevers, C. E., & Paterson, J. S. (2003). Automatic assessment of problem-solving skills in mathematics. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787403004002002
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. (2009). Marking and moderation in the UK: False assumptions and wasted resources. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, B., & Labovic, A. (2009). Using Maple to implement eLearning integrated with computer aided assessment. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390903226856
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, S. J., Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Robinson, C. L. (2017). The effectiveness of computer-aided assessment for purposes of a mathematical sciences lecturer. In M. Ramirez-Montoya (Ed.), Handbook of research on driving STEM learning with educational technologies (pp. 427–443). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, S. J., Robinson, C. L., & Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2013). Lecturers’ perspectives on the use of a mathematics-based computer-aided assessment system. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 32(2), 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrt008
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Bull, J., & Pendlebury, M. (1997). Assessing student learning in higher education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Challis, N., Houston, K., & Stirling, D. (2004). Supporting good practice in assessment. Maths, Stats and OR Network.
   Google Scholar
• Chelimsky, E. (1997). Thoughts for a new evaluation society. Evaluation, 3(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909700300107
   Google Scholar
• Cigdem, H., & Oncu, S. (2015). E-Assessment adaptation at a military vocational college: Student perceptions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(5), 971–988. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1368a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, B. (2011). Teaching mathematics in higher education – the basics and beyond. Maths, Stats and OR Network.
   Google Scholar
• Earl, S. E. (1986). Staff and peer assessment – measuring an individual's contribution to group performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293860110105
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, L., Foster, B., & Youd, A. (2008). Using computer based assessments in a large statistics service course. MSOR Connections, 8(3), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2008.08030045
   Google Scholar
• Ferrão, M. (2010). E-assessment within the Bologna paradigm: Evidence from Portugal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(7), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903060990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, B., Perfect, C., & Youd, A. (2012). A completely client-side approach to e-assessment and e-learning of mathematics and statistics. International Journal of e-Assessment, 2(2), https://ijea.org.uk/index.php/journal/article/view/35
   Google Scholar
• Genemo, H., Miah, S. J., & McAndrew, A. (2016). A design science research methodology for developing a computer-aided assessment approach using method marking concept. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1769–1784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9417-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, M. (2015). Effective computer-aided assessment of mathematics; principles, practice and results. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 34(3), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrv012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, N. (2007). Individualized statistics coursework using spreadsheets. Teaching Statistics, 29(2), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9639.2007.00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2012). A survey of current assessment practices. In P. Iannone, & A. Simpson (Eds.), Mapping university mathematics assessment practices (pp. 3–15). University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Klai, S., Kolokolnikov, T., & Van den Bergh, N. (2000). Using maple and the web to grade mathematics tests. In J. C. Kinshuk, & T. Okamoto (Eds.), Advanced learning technology: Design and development issues (pp. 89–92). IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, D. (2002). Computer-aided assessment in mathematics: Panacea or propaganda? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• MacBean, J., Graham, T., & Sangwin, C. (2004). Group work in mathematics: A survey of students’ experiences and attitudes. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 23(2), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/23.2.49
   Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, J. (1987). Art gallery theorems and algorithms. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Venegas, N. B., Lopez, G., & Andrade-Aréchiga, M. (2015). Conceptualization, development and implementation of a web-based system for automatic evaluation of mathematical expressions. Computers & Education, 88, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. (2019). Subject benchmark statement: Mathematics, statistics and operational research.
   Google Scholar
• Quinney, D. (2010). The role of E-assessment in mathematics. In P. Bogacki (Ed.), Electronic proceedings of the twenty-second annual international conference on technology in collegiate mathematics (pp. 279–288). Pearson Education. http://archives.math.utk.edu/ICTCM/VOL22/S093/paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rønning, F. (2017). Influence of computer-aided assessment on ways of working with mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 36(2), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlett, P. (2013). Developing a Healthy Scepticism About Technology in Mathematics Teaching. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 3(1), 136–149, https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201301.11
   Google Scholar
• Sangwin, C. (2004). Assessing mathematics automatically using computer algebra and the internet. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 23(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/23.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Sangwin, C. (2015). Computer aided assessment of mathematics using STACK. In S. J. Cho (Ed.), Selected regular lectures from the 12th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 698–713). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17187-6_39.
   Google Scholar
• Sangwin, C. J. (2007). Assessing elementary algebra with STACK. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(8), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390601002906
   Google Scholar
• Seaton, K. A. (2019). Laying groundwork for an understanding of academic integrity in mathematics tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(7), 1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1640399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomlinson, M. M., Robinson, M., & Challis, N. V. (2010). Coursework, what should be its nature and assessment weight? In M. Robinson, N. Challis, & M. Thomlinson (Eds.), Maths at university: Reflections on experience, practice and provision (pp. 122–126). More Maths Grads.
   Google Scholar