An Activity Theory approach in explaining engineering students’ difficulties with university mathematics

References

• Alpers, B. (2013). A framework for mathematics curricula in engineering education ( B. Alpers, Ed.). European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI).
   Google Scholar
• Anastasakis, M., Robinson, C. L., & Lerman, S. (2017). Links between students’ goals and their choice of educational resources in undergraduate mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 36(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwin, P. (2009). Analysing teaching-learning interactions in higher education: Accounting for structure and agency. Continuum International Pub. Group.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using Activity Theory to understand the systemic tensions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76–107. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0902_02
   Google Scholar
• Barry, M. D. J., & Steele, N. C. (1993). A core curriculum in mathematics for the European engineer: An overview. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 24(2), 223–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739930240207
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R. K. E. (1996). Designing educational technology: Computer mediated change. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 123–146). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernold, L. E., Spurlin, J. E., & Anson, C. M. (2007). Understanding our students: A longitudinal-study of success and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00935.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biza, I., Giraldo, V., Hochmuth, R., Khakbaz, A., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Research on teaching and learning mathematics at the tertiary level: State-of-the-art and looking ahead. In ICME-13 topical surveys (pp. 1–32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41814-8_1
   Google Scholar
• Breen, S., O'Shea, A., & Pfeiffer, K. (2013). The use of unfamiliar tasks in first year calculus courses to aid the transition from school to university mathematics. In M. M. B. Ubuz & C. Haser (Eds.). Presented at the Proceedings of the 8th Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education, Antalya, Turkey (pp. 2316–2325).
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. ( N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., Murphy, E., Bowe, B., & Ní Fhloinn, E. (2012). Addressing continuing mathematical deficiencies with advanced mathematical diagnostic testing. In B. Alpers, C. Robinson, G. Rodriguez, A. Martin, & A. de la Villa (Eds.). Presented at the 16th SEFI Maths Working Group Seminar, Salamanca, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Castela, C. (2004). Institutions influencing mathematics students’ private work: A factor of academic achievement. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000047050.70008.59
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M., & Lovric, M. (2008). Suggestion for a theoretical model for secondary- tertiary transition in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217475
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. The Bellmap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, P., & Butler, R. (2013). Using activity theory to problematize the role of the teacher during Mobile learning. SAGE Open, 3(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013516155
   Google Scholar
• Cramm, C. (2012). Mathematics knowledge of study beginners: evaluation of 23 years preparatory course. In B. Alpers, C. Robinson, G. Rodriguez, A. Martin, & A. de la Villa (Eds.). Presented at the 16th SEFI Maths Working Group Seminar, Salamanca, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Csakany, A. (2012). Assessment of engineering students in mathematics at Budapest university of technology and economics. In B. Alpers, C. Robinson, G. Rodriguez, A. Martin, & A. de la Villa (Eds.). Presented at the 16th SEFI Maths Working Group Seminar, Salamanca, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• De Guzmán, M., Hodgson, B. R., Robert, A., & Villani, V. (1998). Difficulties in the passage from secondary to tertiary education. In Proceedings of the international Congress of Mathematicians (Vol. 3, pp. 747–762). Berlin: Documenta Mathematica.
   Google Scholar
• Drisko, J., & Maschi, T. (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 64–103). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Learning by expanding: Ten years after. Introduction to German edition of learning by expanding. Originally published as Lerner durch Expansion. BdWi-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811111132758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fhloinn, E. N., Fitzmaurice, O., Mac an Bhaird, C., & O’Sullivan, C. (2016). Gender differences in the level of engagement with mathematics support in higher education in Ireland. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0031-4
   Google Scholar
• Flegg, J., Mallet, D., & Lupton, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of the relevance of mathematics in engineering. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.644333
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, H., & Hadjerrouit, S. (2019). An activity theory perspective on contradictions in flipped mathematics classrooms at the university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1591533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueudet, G. (2008). Investigating the secondary–tertiary transition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9100-6
   Google Scholar
• Gueudet, G., Bosch, M., diSessa, A. A., Kwon, O. N., & Verschaffel, L. (2016). Transitions in mathematics education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31622-2
   Google Scholar
• Hawkes, T., & Savage, M. (2000). Measuring the mathematics problem. Engineering Council.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, D., Martin, M., O’Sullivan, C., Reilly, J., & Robinson, P. (2010). Promoting active learning in Mathematics - a “Problems First” approach. Presented at the 16th SEFI Maths Working Group Seminar, Wismar, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, A., & Van Gastel, L. (2006). Mathematics on the threshold. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(8), 925–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390600819003
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Martinez, P. (2016). “Lost in transition”: Alienation and drop out during the transition to mathematically-demanding subjects at university. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourigan, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2007). Mathematical under-preparedness: The influence of the pre-tertiary mathematics experience on students’ ability to make a successful transition to tertiary level mathematics courses in Ireland. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390601129279
   Google Scholar
• Hoyles, C., Newman, K., & Noss, R. (2001). Changing patterns of transition from school to university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(6), 829–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390110067635
   Google Scholar
• Jablonka, E., Ashjari, H., & Bergsten, C. (2017). “Much palaver about greater than zero and such stuff” – first year engineering students’ recognition of university mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-016-0037-y
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, B., Robinson, C., Matthews, J., & Croft, T. (2012). An activity theory analysis of teaching goals versus student epistemological positions. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 19(4), 147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Jooganah, K., & Williams, J. S. (2016). Contradictions between and within school and university activity systems helping to explain students’ difficulty with advanced mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 35(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrw014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, P., & Noss, R. (2003). Mathematics in the university education of engineers: A report to the Ove Arup Foundation. The Ove Arup Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• King, S. O., & Robinson, C. L. (2009). “Pretty Lights” and Maths! Increasing student engagement and enhancing learning through the use of electronic voting systems. Computers & Education, 53(1), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouvela, E., Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Croft, T. (2018). This is what you need to be learning: An analysis of messages received by first-year mathematics students during their transition to university (pp. 1–19). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0226-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• London Mathematical Society. (1995). Tackling the mathematics problem. University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, E., & Rodríguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2013). Activity theory perspectives on technology in higher education. In Activity theory perspectives on technology in higher education (pp. 328–18). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4590-5.ch001
   Google Scholar
• Mustoe, L., & Lawson, D. (Eds.). (2002). Mathematics for the European Engineer: A curriculum for the twenty-first century. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI).
   Google Scholar
• Nieto, S. (2012). Pre-knowledge of basic mathematics topics in engineering students in Spain. In B. Alpers, C. Robinson, G. Rodriguez, A. Martin, & A. de la Villa (Eds.). Presented at the 16th SEFI Maths Working Group Seminar, Salamanca, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Noskov, M. V., & Shershneva, V. A. (2007). The mathematics education of an engineer: Traditions and innovations. Russian Education & Society, 49(11), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393491104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue, J. (1999). An intervention to assist “at risk” students in service mathematics courses at the university of Limerick: Teaching fellowship report. University of Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Pampaka, M., Williams, J., & Homer, M. (2016). Is the educational “what works” agenda working? Critical methodological developments. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1170476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampaka, M., Williams, J., & Hutcheson, G. (2012). Measuring students’ transition into university and its association with learning outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 38(6), 1041–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.613453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, A., & Karsenty, R. (2018). From course design to presentations of proofs: How mathematics professors attend to student independent proof reading. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 49, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potari, D. (2013). The relationship of theory and practice in mathematics teacher professional development: An activity theory perspective. ZDM, 45(4), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0498-2
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D., & Yañez, A. (2003). Big picture people rarely become historians’: Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In C. Bazerman, & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives (pp. 331–362). The WAC Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino, A. (2008). Sustaining a non-dominant activity in school: Only a utopia? Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9080-z
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J. L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47224-4_8
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. O. J., & Klymchuk, S. (2012). The school–tertiary interface in mathematics: Teaching style and assessment practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0051-6
   Google Scholar
• Unesco. (1966). New trends in mathematics teaching Vol. I. Prepared by the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (ICMI).
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. ( M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2010). Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments. In Activity systems analysis methods: Understanding complex learning environments (pp. 1–148). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6321-5
   Google Scholar