Learning and teaching of calculus: performance analysis in a unified system

References

• Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 10, 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo de Oliveira, M. C., & Ribeiro Raad, M. (2012). A existência de uma cultura escolar de reprovação no ensino de Cálculo. Boletim GEPEM, 61, 125–137. https://doi.org/10.4322/gepem.2014.018
   Google Scholar
• Babcock, P., & Marks, M. (2010). Leisure college, USA: The decline in student study time. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. https://immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/AEI_US/A100809B.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014) Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, M., Fonseca, C., & Gascón, J. (2004). Incompletitud de las organizaciones matemáticas locales en las instituciones escolares. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 24(2–3), 205–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bressou, D. (1994). Student attitudes in first-semester calculus. MAA Focus, 14, 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D. (2020). The strange role of calculus in the United States. ZDM Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01188-0
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D., Ghedamsi, I., Martinez-Luaces, V., & Törner, G. (2016). Teaching and learning of calculus. In ICME-13 topical surveys. Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Bressoud, D., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Seven characteristics of successful calculus programs. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 62(2), 144–146. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti/201502
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, D., Callahan, J., & Shadle, S. E. (2015). Coherent calculus course design: Creating faculty buy-in for student success. 122nd ASEE annual conference and exposition, June 14–17, Seattle, WA. American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrez Rissi, M., & Santana Marcondes, M. A. (2013). Reflexão sobre a reprovação, retenção e evasão na UEL: retenção em 2010, reprovação 2010 a 2012 e evasão 2003 a 2012 nos cursos de graduação. Universidade Estadual de Londrina.
   Google Scholar
• Carelli, M. J. G., & dos Santos, A. A. A. (1998). Condições temporais e pessoais de estudo em universitários. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 2(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85571998000300006
   Google Scholar
• Cavasotto, M., & Viali, L. (2011). Dificuldades na aprendizagem de cálculo: o que os erros podem informar. Boletim GEPEM, 59, 15–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell, K. K., & Killpatrick, K. (2003). Effects of concept-based instruction on students' conceptual understanding and procedural knowledge of calculus. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 13(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970308984043
   Google Scholar
• Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) Bulletin, 3, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, F. (2018). Grade inflation: Causes, consequences and cure. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(6), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n6p86
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. W. (1982). A modified Moore method for teaching undergraduate mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 89(7), 473–474, 487–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1982.11995481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coqueiro Silva, A., Santos Correa, C., de Assis Coelho, D., D. Teixeira da Silva Neto, Ferraz, L., Moreira Xavier, M., da Silva Reis, R., Rocha, F. A., & P. Alves Santos (2016). Analysis of failure rates in Calculus I and VAAG disciplines of electrical engineering course of the federal institute of Bahia of Vitória Da Conquista. In XIV International Conference on Engineering and Technology Education, February 28–March 02, Salvador, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• de Andrade, D. F., Tavares, H. R., & da Cunha Valle, R. (2000). Teoria da Resposta ao Item: conceitos e aplicações. ABE.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J., Kelton, M. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2014). Student perceptions of pedagogy and associated persistence in calculus. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0577-z
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item response theory. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. (2018). Developing mathematical fluency: comparing exercises and rich tasks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9788-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J., Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hatiie, J. A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 147–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90035-8
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning boosts performance in STEM courses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gontijo Júnior, J. F., Rodrigues de Bessa, V., & Cezana, M. J. (2015). Um estudo sobre o baixo índice de aprovação nas disciplinas de cálculo da universidade federal de Viçosa – campus Rio Paranaíba. Revista Iluminart, Ano VII, No 13.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, R. A., & Hamrick, T. R. (2012). Comparison of paths to calculus success [Paper presentation]. 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21092
   Google Scholar
• Hong, D., Choi, K., Hwang, J., & Runnalls, C. (2017). Integral students' experiences: Measuring instructional quality and instuctors' challenges in Calculus 1 lessons. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 3(2), 424–437. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.327901
   Google Scholar
• Hove, C., & Corcoran, K. J. (2008). If you post it, will they come? Lecture availability in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862830803500205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers' ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (Vol. 1). MERGA. https://www2.merga.net.au/documents/Kazemi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kensington-Miller, B., Sneddon, J., Yoon, C., & Stewart, S. (2013). Changing beliefs about teaching in large undergraduate mathematics classes. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 15(2), 52–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, L. (2017). Examining mathematics classroom interactions: elevating student roles in teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 3(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In Mathematics learning study committee, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M., & Graziani, F. (2009). Instructional activities as a tool for teachers' and teacher educators' learning. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1086/596998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., Glover, E., & Melhuish, K. (2015). Beyond good teaching: The benefits and challenges of implementing ambitious teaching. In D. Bressoud, V. Mesa, & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Insights and recommendations from the MAA national study of college calculus (pp. 93–105). https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cspcc/InsightsandRecommendations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. S., & Harrison, M. A. (2012). Online delivery as a course adjunct promotes active learning and student success. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311430641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes da Silva Garcia, L. M., Lara, D. F., & Antunes, F. (2020). Análise da retenção no ensino superior: Um estudo de caso em um curso de sistemas de informação. Rev. Fac. Educ. (Univ. do Estado de Mato Grosso), 2020 Ahead of Print. Page 1 of 22. https://periodicos.unemat.br/index.php/ppgedu/article/view/4962
   Google Scholar
• Maki, W. S., & Maki, R. (2000). Evaluation of a web-based introductory psychology course: II. Contingency management to increase use of on-line study AIDS. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(2), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207789
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Masola, W. J., & Allevato, N. S. G. (2016). Dificuldades de aprendizagem matemática de alunos ingressantes na educação superior. REBES - Revista Brasileira de Ensino Superior, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.18256/2447-3944/rebes
   Google Scholar
• Mesa, V., Burn, H., & White, N. (2015). Good teaching of calculus I. In D. Bressoud, V. Mesa & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Insights and recommendations from the MAA national study of college calculus (pp. 83–91). https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cspcc/InsightsandRecommendations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2007). Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning. College Teaching, 55(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.55.2.42-47
   Google Scholar
• Nasser, L., Alves de Sousa, G., & Torraca, M. A. A. (2017). Desempenho em cálculo: investigando a transição do ensino médio para o superior. Boletim GEPEM, 70. https://doi.org/10.4322/gepem.2017.020
   Google Scholar
• Nasser, L., Novoa Vaz, R. F., & Torraca, M. A. A. (2015). Transição do Ensino Médio para o Superior: Investigando Dificuldades em Geometria Analítica. VI Seminário Internacional de Pesquisa em Educação Matemática.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.2004.93.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabelo, M. L. (2013). Avaliação educacional: fundamentos, metodologia e aplpicaçõers no contexto brasileiro. Coleção PROFMAT, SBM.
   Google Scholar
• Rabelo, M. L., Magalhães, C. A., & Furtado, M. (2015). Criação de banco de itens calibrados como subsídio para avaliação de cálculo diferencial e integral. Conferência Internacional do Espaço Matemático em Língua Portuguesa, Coimbra, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Rabelo, M. L., Magalhães, C. A., Furtado, M., & Marinho-Araújo, C. (2016). The reference matrix as support for skills assessment in differential and integral calculus. 8th international symposium on project approaches in engineering education (PAEE) and 14th active learning in engineering education workshop (ALE), Guimarães, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Rafael, R. C., & Escher, M. A. (2015). Evasão, baixo rendimento e reprovações em Cálculo Diferencial e Integral: Uma questão a ser discutida. In Encontro Mineiro de Educação Matemática, 7, 2015. Anais. Juiz de Fora, 2015. http://www.ufjf.br/emem/files/2015/10/EVAS%C3%83O-BAIXO-RENDIMENTO-EREPROVA%C3%87%C3%95ES-EM-C%C3%81LCULO-DIFERENCIAL-E-INTEGRAL-UMAQUEST%C3%83O-A-SER-DISCUTIDA-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., & Ellis, J. (2015). Calculus coordination at PhD-granting universities: More than just using the same syllabus, textbook, and final exam. In D. Bressoud, V. Mesa, & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Insights and recommendations from the MAA national study of college calculus (pp. 107–116). https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cspcc/InsightsandRecommendations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robert, A., & R. Schwarzenberger. (1991). Research in teaching and learning mathematics at an advanced level. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 127–139). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, A. (2001). Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA – a GLM approach. ISM introducing statistical methods. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rylands, L. J., & Coady, C. (2009). Performance of students with weakmathematics in first-year mathematics and science. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(6), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390902914130
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzenberger, R. L. E. (1980). Why calculus cannot be made easy. The Mathematical Gazette, 64(429), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.2307/3615117
   Google Scholar
• Sithole, A., Chiyaka, E. T., McCarthy, P., Mupinga, D. M., Bucklein, B. K., & Kibirige, J. (2017). Student attraction, persistence and retention in STEM programs: Successes and continuing challenges. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p46
   Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. The Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.26.3.0009
   Google Scholar
• Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2015). The impact of instructor and institutional factors on students' attitudes. In D. Bressoud, V. Mesa, & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Insights and recommendations from the MAA national study of college calculus (pp. 17–29). https://www.maa.org/sites/default/files/pdf/cspcc/InsightsandRecommendations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D. (1985). Understanding the calculus. Mathematics Teaching, 110, 49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Tall, D. (1991). The psychology of advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall, (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 3–21). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Taraban, R. (2012). Time-on-task: A pedagogical measure to assesses differences in US and Indian engineering curricula and outcomes. American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Taraban, R., Hayes, M. W., Anderson, E. E., & Sharma, M. P. (2004). Giving students time for the academic resources that work. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.2004.93.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taraban, R., Ryneardon, K., & Stalcup, K. A. (2001). Time as a variable in learning on the world-wide web. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195368
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tetteh, G. A. (2017). The impact of a student's study time journal as a lesson and learning study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 6(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-05-2016-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törner, G., Potari, D., & Zachariades, T. (2014). Calculus in European classrooms: curriculum and teaching in different educational and cultural contexts. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0612-0
   Google Scholar
• Trevisan, A. L., & Tavares Mendes, M. (2018). Ambientes de ensino e aprendizagem de Cálculo Diferencial e Integral organizados a partir de episódios de resolução de tarefas: uma proposta. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia, 11(1), 209–227. Ponta Grossa. https://doi.org/10.3895/rbect.v11n1.5702
   Google Scholar
• Walberg, H. J. (2003). Improving educational productivity. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44829325_Improving_educational_productivity
   Google Scholar
• White, N., & Mesa, V. (2014). Describing cognitive orientation of Calculus I tasks across different types of coursework. ZDM The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0588-9
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Deshler, J., & Fuller, E. (2018). The effects of different versions of a gateway STEM course on student attitudes and beliefs. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, Article number: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0141-4
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, C., Hutz, C. S., Yoo, H., & Hambleton, R. K. (2016). An application of item response theory to psychological test development. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0040-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar