Lifting the understanding of trigonometric limits from procedural towards conceptual

References

• Abdul Rahman, M. H., & Puteh, M. (2016). Learning trigonometry using GeoGebra learning module: Are under achiever pupils motivated? AIP Conference Proceedings, 1750, 040001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4954586
   Google Scholar
• Ainsworth, S., & Loizou, A. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 669–681. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2704_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackett, N., & Tall, D. O. (1991). Gender and the versatile learning of trigonometry using computer software. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 144–151). PME.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, W. A. (1947). The place of meaning in the teaching of arithmetic. Elementary School Journal, 47(5), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1086/462322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P. (1986). Conceptual knowledge as a foundation for procedural knowledge. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 113–132). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Jacobs, V. R., Fennema, E., & Empson, S. B. (1998). A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children’s multidigit addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/749715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. J., Lee, C. Y., & Hsu, W. C. (2015). Influence of mathematical representation and mathematics self-efficacy on the learning effectiveness of fifth graders in pattern reasoning. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 13(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Self-explaining: The dual processes of generating inference and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 161–238). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, K. E. (2013). Making sense of mathematics: supportive and problematic conceptions with special reference to trigonometry [Dissertation, University of Warwick].
   Google Scholar
• Choi-koh, S. S. (2003). Effect of a graphing calculator on a 10th-grade student’s study of trigonometry. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309596619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. B., & McKnight, C. (1980). The influence of semantic content on algorithmic behavior. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3(1), 39–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C. R., Weinhold, M., & Nichols, C. (1991). Trigonometry today. Mathematics Teacher, 84(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.84.2.0098
   Google Scholar
• Kamber, D., & Takaci, D. (2018). On problematic aspects in learning trigonometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1357846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National.
   Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1 ), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, T., & Johnson, M. (2000). Rigour, reliability and validity research. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing, 4(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1054/cein.2000.0106
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, C., Devine, K. L., Brown, J. W., & Brown, R. A. (2010). Improving geometric and trigonometric knowledge and skill for high school mathematics teachers: A professional development partnership. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(2), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.3
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., & LaForest, K. R. (2014). The circle approach to trigonometry. Mathematics Teacher, 107(8), 616–623. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.8.0616
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., LaForest, K. R., & Kim, H. J. (2016). Putting the unit in pre-service secondary teachers’ unit circle. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(2), 243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9680-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo, J., & Govender, R. (2014). Exploring the use of a dynamic online software programme in the teaching and learning of trigonometric graphs. Pythagoras, 35(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v35i2.260
   Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, B. R. (1998). Computer intensive algebra and students’ conceptual knowledge of functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/749716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabowo, A., Anggoro, R. P., Adiyanto, R., & Rahmawati, U. (2018). Interactive multimedia-based teaching material for trigonometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012138. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012138
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B. (2006). Promoting transfer: Effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. Child Development, 77(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00852.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017). Developing mathematics knowledge. Child Development Perspectives, 11(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Schneider, M. (2015). Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In R. C. Kadosh, & A. Dowker (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of numerical cognition (pp. 1118–1134). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2011). The power of comparison in learning and instruction: Learning outcomes supported by different types of comparisons. In J. P. Mestre, & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 199–222). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., & Oppezzo, M. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (2002). Microgenetic studies of self-explanation. In N. Garnott, & J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment: A process-oriented perspective for studying development and learning (pp. 31–58). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, E. A. (1986). Using conceptual and procedural knowledge: A focus on relationship. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 181–198). Lawrence Erlbaum associates.
   Google Scholar
• Siyepu, S. W. (2015). Analysis of errors in derivatives of trigonometric functions. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0029-5
   Google Scholar
• Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, J. R. (2007). Foregrounding procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, J. R., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Procedural and conceptual knowledge: Exploring the gap between knowledge type and knowledge quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.784828
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). God forskningsetik.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2005). Students’ understanding of trigonometric functions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217423
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2008). Teaching trigonometric functions: Lessons learned from research. The Mathematics Teacher, 102(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.102.2.0144
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 202–231). Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar