Motivation to study calculus: measuring student performance expectation, utility value and interest

References

• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Akbuga, E., Hurdle, Z., Daniels, S., & Laffey, R. (2019). Using Calculus Writing Assignments to Foster Student Motivation. Mathematics in School, 47(4), 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1998.tb00616.x
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1999). Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for particular learning domains and activities. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., Yeager, D. S., Hausman, H., Muhich, J., Dolle, J. R., Grunow, A., & Gomez, L. (2013, June). Improvement research carried out through networked communities: Accelerating learning about practices that support more productive student mindsets. A White Paper prepared for the White house meeting on “excellence in education: The importance of academic mindsets. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/resources/publications/improvement-research-carried-networked-communities-accelerating-learning-practices-support-productive-student-mindsets/.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, 2nd ed. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, Research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7.
   Google Scholar
• Daempfle, P. A. (2003). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 5(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.2190/DWQT-TYA4-T20W-RCWH
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. G., & Finelli, C. J. (2007). Diversity and retention in engineering. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007(111), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.287
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Durik, A. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2007). Different strokes for different folks: How individual interest moderates the effects of situational factors on task interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., Midgley, C., & Spence, J. T. (1983). Expectations, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, D. E., & Johnson, L. S. (1986). Environmental and water quality operational studies: An assessment of reservoir mixing processes. Ford Thornton Norton And Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz, J. M., Tibbetts, Y., Canning, E., & Hyde, J. S. (2014). Harnessing values to promote motivation in education. In Motivational interventions (pp. 71–105). Emerald Group Publishing Limited
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, C. A., Grande, M. R., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2021). The role of utility value in promoting interest development. Motivation Science, 7(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. C., & Lin, S. H. (2015). Development and validation of an inventory for measuring student attitudes toward calculus. Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development, 48(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175614563314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second-generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosovich, J. J., Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., & Getty, S. (2015). A practical measure of student motivation: Establishing validity evidence for the expectancy-value-cost scale in middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5-6), 790–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614556890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever Too much? The number of indicators per factor in Confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 33(2), 181–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, P. J. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2009). Students who study Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009161.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2014). STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and Out of STEM Fields. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., García, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics [Report to President]. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-toexcel-final_feb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Puruhito, K., Husman, J., Hilpert, J. C., Ganesh, T., & Stump, G. (2011). Increasing instrumentality without decreasing instructional time: An intervention for engineering students. F2J-1. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, PÉ, & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, E. Q., Harackiewicz, J. M., Priniski, S. J., Hecht, C. A., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., & Hyde, J. S. (2019). Choose your own intervention: Using choice to enhance the effectiveness of a utility value intervention. Motivation Science, 5(3), 269. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenzweig, E. Q., Wigfield, A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2020). More useful or not so bad? Examining the effects of utility value and cost reduction interventions in college physics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5-12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye, & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, E. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Nature, 386(6625), 566–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (1988). Calculus for a New Century: A Pump, Not a Filter. Papers Presented at a Colloquium (Washington, DC, October 28-29, 1987). MAA Notes Number 8. ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Intelligence, competence, and expertise. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 15–30). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and Recommendations for Best practices. The Counselling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, C., Georgiopoulos, M., Hagen, S., Geiger, C., Dagley-Falls, M., Islas, A., & Forde, D. (2011). Improving student learning in calculus through applications. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.550944
   Google Scholar