An examination of discourse analytic methods in the context of mathematical group work

References

• References marked with an asterisk (*) were included in the systematic review.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2018). General mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/senior-secondary-curriculum/mathematics/general-mathematics/?unit=Unit+1&unit=Unit+2&unit=Unit+3&unit=Unit+4. Accessed 11 Mar 2020.
   Google Scholar
• *Anderson-Pence, K., & Moyer-Packenham, P. (2016). The influence of different virtual manipulative types on student-led techno-mathematical discourse. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 35(1), 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bales, R. F. (2001). Social interaction systems. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• *Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 403–436. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barwell, R. (2005a). Integrating language and content: Issues from the mathematics classroom. Linguistics and Education, 16(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.002
   Google Scholar
• *Barwell, R. (2005b). Working on arithmetic word problems when English is an additional language. British Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920500082177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bishop, J. P. (2012). “She's always been the smart one. I've always been the dumb one”: identities in the mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 34–74. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed-ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (2007). Exploring the social positions that students construct within a classroom community of practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 116–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “identity”. Theory and Society, 29, 1–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchs, C., Butera, F., Mugny, G., & Darnon, C. (2004). Conflict elaboration and cognitive outcomes. Theory Into Practice, 43(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4301_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchs, C., Filippou, D., Pulfrey, C., & Volpé, Y. (2017). Challenges for cooperative learning implementation: Reports from elementary school teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2017.1321673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T. G., & Hodges, T. S. (2020). Using positioning theory to examine how students collaborate in groups in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiu, M. M. (2000). Status effects on solutions, leadership, and evaluations during group problem solving. Sociology of Education, 73(3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiu, M. M. (2008a). Flowing toward correct contributions during group problem solving: A statistical discourse analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(3), 415–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400802224830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chiu, M. M. (2008b). Effects of argumentation on group micro-creativity: Statistical discourse analyses of algebra students’ collaborative problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Scarloss, B. A., & Arellano, A. R. (1999). Complex instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• *Crespo, S. (2006). Elementary teacher talk in mathematics study groups. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9006-0
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014). Mathematics: Programmes of study: Key stages 1-2: (National curriculum in England). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/239129/PRIMAR_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doise, W., Mugny, G., & Perret-Clermont, A. N. (1975). Social interaction and the development of cognitive operations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420050309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• *Elbers, E., & Streefland, L. (2000). Collaborative learning and the construction of common knowledge. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Esmonde, I., & Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2013). Power in numbers: Student participation in mathematical discussions in heterogeneous spaces. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 288–315. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Evans, M. A., Feenstra, E., Ryon, E., & McNeill, D. (2011). A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(2), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9113-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Battey. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes, K., Claes, L., & the Belgian Campbell Group (2007). Learn to read and write systematic reviews: The Belgian Campbell Group as a local partner. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(6), 748–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507303106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., Wagner, D., Johnson, K. R., Suh, H., & Figueras, H. (2015). Positioning in mathematics education: Revelations on an imported theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9588-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., & Sfard, A. (2012). Identity struggles in the mathematics classroom: On learning mathematics as an interplay of mathematizing and identifying. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52, 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.015
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Lave, J. (2001). History in person: An introduction. In D. Holland, & J. Lave (Eds.), History in person: Enduring struggles, contentious practice, intimate identities (pp. 3–33). School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1989). Crucial decisions. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Jarosz, A. F., Goldenberg, O., & Wiley, J. (2017). Learning by invention: Small group discussion activities that support learning in statistics. Discourse Processes, 54(4), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1129593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Roseth, C. (2010). Cooperative learning in middle schools: Interrelationship of relationships and achievement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• *Kieran, C. (2001). The mathematical discourse of 13-year-old partnered problem solving and its relation to the mathematics that emerges. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 187–228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014040725558
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leikin, R., & Zaslavsky, O. (1997). Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 331–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/749784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), 336–341. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2018). Catalyzing change in high school mathematics: Initiating critical conversations.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, P., & Ryve, A. (2014). The nature and role of common ground in the learning of mathematics in small-group discussions. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(5), 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.821087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlitzky, M., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To err is human, to correct for it divine. Small Group Research, 32(3), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Orme, M. P., & Monroe, E. E. (2005). The nature of discourse as students collaborate on a mathematics WebQuest. Computers in the Schools, 22(1-2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1300/J025v22n01_12
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1932). The language and thought of the child (2nd ed.). Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1975).
   Google Scholar
• *Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(3), 237–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017530828058
   Google Scholar
• *Ryve, A. (2004). Can collaborative concept mapping create mathematically productive discourses? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(2-3), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040395.17555.c2
   Google Scholar
• *Ryve, A. (2006). Making explicit the analysis of students’ mathematical discourses–revisiting a newly developed methodological framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-4834-0
   Google Scholar
• Ryve, A. (2011). Discourse research in mathematics education: A critical evaluation of 108 journal articles. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 167–199. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.42.2.0167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ryve, A., Nilsson, P., & Pettersson, K. (2013). Analyzing effective communication in mathematics group work: The role of visual mediators and technical terms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9442-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, G. (ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A. (2015). Why all this talk about talking classrooms? Theorizing the relation between talking and learning. In C. S. Asterhan, S. N. Clarke, & L. B. Resnick (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• *Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), 42–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0801_04
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014
   Google Scholar
• *Sharon, V. (2012). The roles they play: Prospective elementary teachers and a problem-solving task. The Mathematics Educator, 22(1), 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2000). Skolverkets föreskrifter om kursplaner och betygskriterier för kurser i ämnet matematik i gymnasieskolan, SKOLFS 2000:5.
   Google Scholar
• Tabach, M., & Schwarz, B. B. (2018). Professional development of mathematics teachers towards the facilitation of small-group collaboration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 273–298.
   Google Scholar
• *Thornborrow, J. (2003). The organization of primary school children's on-task and off-task talk in a small group setting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Towers, J., & Martin, L. C. (2015). Enactivism and the study of collectivity. ZDM, 47(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0643-6
   Google Scholar
• *van de Sande, C. C., & Greeno, J. G. (2012). Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Langenhove, L., & Harré, R. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 14–31). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Webel, C. (2013). High school students’ goals for working together in mathematics class: Mediating the practical rationality of studenting. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15(1), 24–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2013.738379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *White, T. (2006). Code talk: Student discourse and participation with networked handhelds. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9658-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, M. C. (1986). Students’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 297–314). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• *Wood, M. B. (2013). Mathematical micro-identities: Moment-to-moment positioning and learning in a fourth-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 775–808. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.5.0775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wood, M. B., & Kalinec, C. A. (2012). Student talk and opportunities for mathematical learning in small group interactions. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52, 109–127. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.008
   Google Scholar