A framework for capturing structural variation in flipped mathematics instruction

References

• de Araujo, Z., Otten, S., & Birisci, S. (2017a). Conceptualizing “homework” in flipped mathematics classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 20, 248–260.
   Google Scholar
• de Araujo, Z., Otten, S., & Birisci, S. (2017b). Mathematics teachers' motivations for, conceptions of, and experiences with flipped instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.11.006
   Google Scholar
• de Araujo, Z., Otten, S., & Birisci, S. (2017c). Teacher-created videos in a flipped mathematics class: Digital curriculum materials or lesson enactments? ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0872-6
   Google Scholar
• de Araujo, Z., Otten, S., Zhao, W., Kamuru, J., & Han, J. (2020). Fostering collaboration with the flip. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(9), 731–736. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtlt.2019.0082
   Google Scholar
• Algarni, B. (2018). A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of flipped classroom in mathematics education. In L. G. Chova, A. L. Martinez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (pp. 7970–7976). IATED Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, K. (2012, August 27). Educators evaluate ‘flipped classrooms’. Education Week, 32(2), 6–8. http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2012/08/29/02el-flipped.h32.html?print=1.
   Google Scholar
• Bagley, S. (2019). The flipped classroom, lethal mutations, and the didactical contract: A cautionary tale. PRIMUS, 30(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2018.1555196
   Google Scholar
• Bart, M. (2013). Survey confirms the growth of the flipped classroom. Faculty Focus. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/edtech-news-and-trends/survey-confirms-growth-of-the-flipped-classroom/.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Boston, M., Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., & Shivley, M. (2015). A comparison of mathematics classroom observation protocols. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(2), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.3.2.0154
   Google Scholar
• Capaldi, M. (2015). Including inquiry-based learning in a flipped class. PRIMUS, 25(8), 736–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1031303
   Google Scholar
• Casem, R. Q. (2016). Effects of flipped instruction on the performance and attitude of high school students in mathematics. European Journal of STEM Education, 1(2), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.20897/lectito.201620
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., & Brickman, P. (2018). When group work doesn’t work: Insights from students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar52. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-09-0199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin, S. H., & O’Connor, C. (2004). Report on Project Challenge: Identifying and developing talent in mathematics within low income urban schools. Boston University School of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-M., & Wu, C.-H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers and Education, 80, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.-S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers and Education, 79, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). e-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSantis, J., van Curen, R., Putsch, J., & Metzger, J. (2015). Do students learn more from a flip? An exploration of the efficacy of flipped and traditional lessons. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 26(1), 39–63.
   Google Scholar
• Desmos, I. (2011). Desmos Graphing Calculator (Version 2.0.1) [Mobile application software]. Available from http://itunes.apple.com.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053002159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. L., Han, J., de Araujo, Z., & Otten, S. (2020). Reviewing the literature on flipped mathematics instruction: A qualitative meta–analysis. In A. I. Sacristán, J. C. Cortés–Zavala, & P. M. Ruiz–Arias (Eds.), Mathematics education across cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 2057–2061). Cinvestav, AMIUTEM, & PME–NA.
   Google Scholar
• Esmonde, I. (2009). Ideas and identities: Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008–1043. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309332562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Explain Everything. (2020). Explain everything [Mobile application software]. https://explaineverything.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. (2016, April 11th). Modeling with mathematics through three-act tasks. Teaching Children Mathematics. http://www.nctm.org/Publications/Teaching-Children-Mathematics/Blog/Modeling-with-Mathematics-through-Three-Act-Tasks/.
   Google Scholar
• Flipped Learning Network (FLN). (2014). The Four Pillars of F-L-I-P™. Reproducible PDF can be found at https://www.flippedlearning.org/definition.
   Google Scholar
• Geogebra. (2021). Dynamic mathematics software. Available from https://www.geogebra.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., de Araujo, Z., Otten, S., Zhao, W., & Hirt, S. (2020, April). An examination of video content delivery in flipped algebra instruction. Paper to be presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (Conference cancelled).
   Google Scholar
• Hansch, A., Hillers, L., McConachie, K., Newman, C., Schildhauer, T., & Schmidt, J. P. (2015). Video and online learning: Critical reflections and findings from the field. HIIG Discussion paper, Series No. 2015-02. https://summeracademy.academic.wlu.edu/files/2020/07/Hansch-et-al-2015-critical-reflections-on-video.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. A. (2013). Review of Flipped Learning: Flipped Learning Network. http://www.flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/41/LitReview_FlippedLearning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Cirillo, M. (2009). Promoting purposeful discourse: Teacher research in mathematics classrooms. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, C. R., & Reys, B. J. (2009). Mathematics curriculum: A vehicle for school improvement. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41(6), 749–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0218-0
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ichinose, C., & Clinkenbeard, J. (2016). Flipping college algebra: Effects on student engagement and achievement. The Learning Assistance Review, 21(1), 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Incikabi, L., Serin, M. K., & Incikabi, S. (2021). Flipping the mathematics instruction: A critical overview of recent trends in application. In J. Keengwe & Y. Tran (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Equity in Computer Science in P-16 Education (pp. 219–247). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4739-7.ch013
   Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220480009596759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312027001029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larnell, G. V. (2016). More than just skill: Examining mathematics identities, racialized narratives, and remediation among Black undergraduates. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(3), 233–269. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.3.0233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017). Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(2), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. (2019, September 24th). Using a simple tech solution to drive mastery-based learning. Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-simple-tech-solution-drive-mastery-based-learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H., & Wilson, A. D. (2018). Flipped learning: Embedding questions in videos. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 23(7), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.23.7.0378
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Chen, G. (2017). Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (1991). Can we teach computers to teach? Computers in Physics, 5(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4822968
   Google Scholar
• McGivney-Burelle, J., & Xue, F. (2013). Flipping calculus. PRIMUS, 23(5), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2012.757571
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. (2011, May 11th). The three acts of a mathematical story. http://blog.mrmeyer.com/2011/the-three-acts-of-a-mathematical-story/.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. (2013, May 8th). Teaching with three-act tasks: Act one. http://blog.mrmeyer.com/2013/teaching-with-three-act-tasks-act-one/.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, D., Walcott, C., & Kloosterman, P. (2019). Mathematical thinking: From assessment items to challenging tasks. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. J., Gillett, M. R., & Steele, M. D. (2014). Fostering student engagement with the flip. Mathematics Teacher, 107(6), 420–425. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.6.0420
   Google Scholar
• Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2013070103
   Google Scholar
• Munter, C., Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (2015). Is there a common pedagogical core? Examining instructional practices of competing models of mathematics teaching. NCSM Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 16(2), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Niess, M. L., & Walker, J. M. (2010). Guest editorial: Digital videos as tools for learning mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(1), 100–105. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/34122/
   Google Scholar
• Otten, S., de Araujo, Z., & Sherman, M. (2018). Capturing variability in flipped mathematics instruction. In T. E. Hodges, G. J. Roy, & A. M. Tyminski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 1052–1059). Clemson University & University of South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Otten, S., & Soria, V. M. (2014). Relationships between students' learning and their participation during enactment of middle school algebra tasks. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46, 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0572-4
   Google Scholar
• Otten, S., Zhao, W., de Araujo, Z., & Sherman, M. (2020). Evaluating videos for flipped instruction. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtlt.2019.0088
   Google Scholar
• Sahin, A., Cavlazoglu, B., & Zeytuncu, Y. E. (2015). Flipping a college calculus course: A case study. Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuman, R. (2014, February). The flipped classroom: A disruptive revolution in pedagogy, or yet another educational fad? Slate. http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2014/02/flipped_classrooms_in_college_lectures_online_and_problem_sets_in_the_classroom.html.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90(4), 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. F. (2014, June 12). How flipped classrooms are growing and changing. Ed Tech Magazine. http://www.edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2014/06/how-flipped-classrooms-are-growing-and-changing.
   Google Scholar
• Staples, M., & Colonis, M. M. (2007). Making the most of mathematical discussions. Mathematics Teacher, 101(4), 257–261. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.101.4.0257
   Google Scholar
• Staples, M. E., & Truxaw, M. P. (2010). The mathematics learning discourse project: Fostering higher order thinking and academic language in urban mathematics classrooms. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3, 27–56.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2009). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F., & Hanson, B. R. (2014). Flipped classrooms and task engagement: Beyond portable lectures. In K. Karp & A. Roth McDuffie (Eds.), Using research to improve instruction (pp. 55–63). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Strayer, J. F., Hart, J., & Bleiler, S. K. (2016). Kick-starting discussions with the flipped classroom. Mathematics Teacher, 109(9), 662–668. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.9.0662
   Google Scholar
• Talbert, R. (2014). Inverting the linear algebra classroom. PRIMUS, 24(5), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2014.883457
   Google Scholar
• Tomas, L., Evans, N., Doyle, T., & Skamp, K. (2019). Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0135-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waster, R. W. (2017). Student and instructor perceptions of a flipped college algebra classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Webel, C., Sheffel, C., & Conner, K. A. (2018). Flipping instruction in a fifth grade class: A case of an elementary mathematics specialist. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Cheng, I., Chen, N., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhai, X., & Kinshuk, A. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. E. (2015). Linear algebra and the experiences of a ‘flipper’. PRIMUS, 25(8), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1031304
   Google Scholar
• Yarbro, J., Arfstrom, K. M., McKnight, K., & McKnight, P. (2014). Extension of a review of flipped learning. http://flippedlearning.org/cms/lib07/VA01923112/Centricity/Domain/41/Extension%20of%20Flipped%20Learning%20Lit%20Review%20June%202014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zack, L., Fuselier, J., Graham-Squire, A., Lamb, R., & O’Hara, K. (2015). Flipping freshman mathematics. PRIMUS, 25(9–10), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2015.1031302
   Google Scholar
• Zainuddin, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Chu, S. K. W., Idris, S., & Keumala, C. M. (2019). Research trends in flipped classroom empirical evidence from 2017 to 2018: A content analysis. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, X., Gu, J., Liu, H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2017). An experiential learning perspective on students’ satisfaction model in a flipped classroom context. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 198–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar