Investigating the alignment to mathematical modelling of teacher-created mathematical modelling activities available online

References

• Abassian, A., Safi, F., Bush, S., & Bostic, J. (2020). Five different perspectives on mathematical modeling in mathematics education. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 12(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1595360
   Google Scholar
• Abramovich, S., & Schunn, C. (2012). Studying teacher selection of resources in an ultra-large scale interactive system: Does metadata guide the way? Computers and Education, 58(1), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramovich, S., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2013). The role of evaluative metadata in an online teacher resource exchange. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(6), 863–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9317-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anhalt, C. O., & Cortez, R. (2016). Developing understanding of mathematical modeling in secondary teacher preparation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(6), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9309-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Cohen, D. (1996). Reform by the book: What is: Or might be: The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X025009006
   Google Scholar
• Bleiler, S. K., Baxter, W. A., Stephens, D. C., & Barlow, A. T. (2015). Constructing meaning: Standards for Mathematical practice. Teaching Children Mathematics, 21(6), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.21.6.0336
   Google Scholar
• Cheah, U. H. (2008). Introducing mathematical modelling to secondary school teachers: A case study. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1/2), 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, K. I., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2012). User-oriented quality for OER: Understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core standards for mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/.
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Mathematics and Its Applications (COMAP) & Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM). (2016). Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in mathematical modeling education. COMAP & SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeMonte, J. (2015). A million new teachers are coming: Will they be ready to teach? Education Policy Center at American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/downloads/report/Million-New-Teachers-Brief-deMonte-May-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & Turmudi, T. (2016). Open ended approach: An effort in cultivating students’ mathematical creative thinking ability and self-esteem in mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2813.9-18
   Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L., Botan, C., & Kreps, G. (1999). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods. (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J., Smalwell, K., & Bellows, E. (2019). ‘Pinning’ with pause: Supporting teachers’ critical consumption on sites of curriculum sharing. Social Education, 83(4), 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Gewertz, C. (2014). Teachers a key source of Common-Core curricula, study finds. Education Week. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/curriculum/2014/10/teachers_a_key_source_of_common_core_curricula.html?cmp=ENL-EU-NEWS2.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, H. (2013). Teachers’ conceptions of mathematical modeling [Unpublished dissertation]. New York: Teachers College Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers Use of Educational Technology in U.S. Public schools (2009): National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education sciences. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, T. E., & Spitulnik, M. (2008). Supporting teachers’ use of technology in science instruction through professional development: A literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9118-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine, T. (2015). Pinned: A qualitative study of teacher experiences of interfacing with online resources for lesson planning [Unpublished dissertation]. Minneapolis, MN: Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Julie, C., & Mudaly, V. (2007). Mathematical modelling of social issues in school mathematics in South Africa. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, M. Niss, & H. W. Henn (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 503–510). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, H., Stehr, E., & He, J. (2019). Mathematical modeling opportunities reported by secondary mathematics preservice teachers and instructors. School Science and Mathematics, 119(6), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., Carmona, G., & Moore, T. (2009). Six sigma learning gains and long term retention of understandings and attitudes related to models & modelling. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 19–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. (2003). Foundations of models and modelling perspective on mathematics teaching, learning and problems solving. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: Models and modelling perspectives on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving (pp. 3–33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modelling. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Maiorca, C., & Stohlmann, M. (2016). Inspiring students in integrated STEM education through modeling activities. In C. Hirsch & A. R. McDuffie (Ed.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education 2016: Mathematical modeling and modeling mathematics (pp. 153–161). Reston, VA: NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Middle Mathematics. (2020). One-step equations – modeling and solving practice. https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Product/One-Step-Equations-Modeling-and-Solving-Practice-3873361.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, R. (2015). How common core is killing the textbook. http://hechingerreport.org/how-common-core-is-killing-the-textbook/.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. (2010). A research framework to examine the impacts of online peer review on learning outcomes in computer science courses [Paper presention]. ITS 2010 workshop: Computer-supported peer review in education: Synergies with Intelligent Tutoring Systems Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Niss, M. (1987). Applications and modelling in the mathematics curriculum – state and trends. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 18(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739870180401
   Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., Kaufman, J. H., & Thompson, L. E. (2016). Implementation of K-12 state standards for mathematics and English language arts and literacy: Findings from the American teacher panel. RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• PBS & Grunwald Associates. (2011). Deepening connections: Teachers increasingly rely on media and technology. http://www.pbs.org/about/media/about/cms_page_media/182/PBSGrunwald-2011e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Re-sourcing teachers’ work and interactions: A collective perspective on resources, their use and transformation. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(7), 929–943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0534-2
   Google Scholar
• Podolsky, A., Kini, T., Bishop, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Solving the teacher shortage: How to attract and retain excellent educators. Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2012). Modes of engagement: Understanding teachers’ transactions with mathematics curriculum resources. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to ‘lived’ resources (pp. 105–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sawada, T. (1997). Developing lesson plans. In J. Becker & S. Shimada (Eds.), The open-ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics (pp. 23–35). NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, K. (2017). The value of search results. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2017/10/30/the-value-of-search-results-rankings/\#7e33232044d3.
   Google Scholar
• Soon, T., & Cheng, A. (2013). Pre-service secondary school teachers’ knowledge in mathematical modelling – A case study. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: Connecting to research and practice (pp. 373–383). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stansbury, K., & Zimmerman, J. (2002). Smart induction programs become lifelines for the beginning teacher. Journal of Staff Development, 23(4), 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M. (2013). Model-Eliciting Activities: Fostering 21st century learners. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 4(2), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M. (2018). A vision for future work to focus on the “m” in integrated STEM. School Science and Mathematics, 118(7), 310–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M. (2019). In-service teachers’ understanding of mathematical modeling. The 118th annual convention of the School Science and Mathematics Association. Salt Lake City, UT: SSMA.
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M. (2020). Math activities. Retrieved from https://www.micahstohlmann.com/math-activities.html
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., & Albarracín, L. (2016). What is known about elementary grades mathematical modelling. Education Research International, 2016, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5240683
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., Maiorca, C., & Allen, C. (2017). A case study of teachers’ development of well-structured mathematical modeling activities. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(2), 4–24.
   Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., Maiorca, C., & Olson, T. (2015). Preservice secondary teachers’ conceptions from a mathematical modeling activity and connections to the Common Core State Standards. The Mathematics Educator Journal, 24(1), 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, T., Khoo, M., Recker, M., & Marlino, M. (2003). Understanding educator perceptions of quality in digital libraries [Paper presentation]. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, IEEE, Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Teachers Pay Teachers. (2020). About us. https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/About-Us.
   Google Scholar
• Tekin, A., Kula, S., Hidiroglu, C. N., Bukova-Guzel, E., & Ugurel, I. (2012). Determining the views of mathematics student teachers related to mathematical modelling. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 13(1), 1–14 .
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, K., & Hart, J. (2010). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of model-eliciting activities. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 531–538). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, H. H. (2009). Assessment for learning to teach appraisal of practice teaching lessons by mentors, supervisors, and student teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108330551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2013). Preparing and credentialing the nation’s teachers: The secretary’s ninth report on teacher quality.
   Google Scholar
• Varygiannes, D. (2013). The impact of open-ended tasks. Teaching Children Mathematics, 20(5), 277–280. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.20.5.0277
   Google Scholar
• Will, M. (2018). 5 things to know about today’s teaching force. Education Week. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/teacherbeat/2018/10/today_teaching_force_richard_ingersoll.html.
   Google Scholar
• Winnie So, W., Cheng, M., Kong, S., & Ching, N. (2014). Views of primary science teachers towards the use of online resources to support the implementation of inquiry learning. Education 3-13, 42(4), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.710640
   Google Scholar
• Yinger, R. (1980). A study of teacher planning. The Elementary School Journal, 80(3), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1086/461181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., & Change, C. (2011). What did Taiwan mathematics teachers think of model-eliciting activities and modelling teaching? In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo-Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 147–156). Springer.
   Google Scholar