253
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Linear independence from a perspective of connections

, , &
Pages 190-205 | Received 28 Mar 2021, Published online: 12 Aug 2021

References

  • Altieri, M., & Schirmer, E. (2019). Learning the concept of eigenvalues and eigenvectors: A comparative analysis of achieved concept construction in linear algebra using APOS theory among students from different educational backgrounds. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education. Springer, 51(7), 1125–1140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01074-4
  • Dogan, H. (2004). Visual instruction of abstract concepts for non-major students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2, 671.
  • Dogan, H. (2006). Lack of Set Theory-Relevant Prerequisite Knowledge. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 37, 41–41.
  • Dogan-Dunlap, H. (2010). Linear Algebra students' modes of reasoning: Geometric Representations. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 432, 2141–2159.
  • Dogan, H. (2018a). Mental schemes of linear algebra: Visual constructs. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra. ICME-13 monographs series. (pp. 219–240). Springer.
  • Dogan, H. (2018b). Differing instructional modalities and cognitive structures: Linear algebra. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 542, 464–483.
  • Dogan, H. (2019). Some aspects of linear independence schemas. In S. Stewat, C. Andrews-Larson, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Research on teaching and learning in linear algebra. Springer Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1169–1181.
  • Caglayan, G. (2019). Is it a subspace or not? Making sense of subspaces of vector spaces in a technology-assisted learning environment. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1215–1238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01101-4
  • Dorier, J., Robert, A., Robinet, J., & Rogalski, M. (2000). The obstacle of formalism in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra, mathematics education library, vol.23 (pp. 85–124). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Dorier, J., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics of university level (pp. 255–273). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Glaser, B. (1992). Emergence vs. forcing: Basics of grounded theory analysis. Sociology Press.
  • Harel, G. (1997). The linear algebra curriculum study group recommendations: Moving beyond concept definition. Resources for Teaching Linear Algebra, MAA Notes, 42, 107–126.
  • Harel, G. (2000). Principles of learning and teaching mathematics, with particular reference to the learning and teaching of linear algebra. In J. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 177–189). Kluwer.
  • Harel, G. (2018). The learning and teaching of linear algebra through the lenses of intellectual need and epistemological justification and their constituents. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra. ICME-13 monographs series part I (pp. 3–28). Springer.
  • Harel, G. (2019). Variations in the use of geometry in the teaching of linear algebra. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1031–1042. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01015-7
  • Hillel, J. (2000). Modes of description and the problem of representation in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 191–207). Kluwer.
  • Johnson, W. L., Riess, D. R., & Arnold, T. J. (2002). Introduction to linear algebra. Pearson Education.
  • Karakok, G. (2019). Making connections among representations of eigenvector: What sort of a beast is it? Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01061-9
  • Kazunga, C., & Bansilal, S. (2018). Misconceptions about determinants. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra. ICME-13 monographs series part II (pp. 127–146). Springer.
  • Oktac, A. (2019). Mental constructions in linear algebra. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1043–1054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01037-9
  • Payton, S. (2019). Fostering mathematical connections in introductory linear algebra through adapted inquiry. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01029-9
  • Selinski, E. N., Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2014). A method for using adjacency matrices to analyze the connections students make within and between concepts: The case of linear algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(5), 550–583. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.5.0550
  • Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Stewart, S., Troup, J., & Plaxco, D. (2019). Reflection on teaching linear algebra: Examining one instructor’s movements between the three worlds of mathematical thinking. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1253–1266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01086-0
  • Trigueros, M. (2018). Learning linear algebra using models and conceptual activities. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra. ICME-13 monographs series part I (pp. 29–50). Springer.
  • Turgut, M. (2019). Sense making regarding matrix representation of geometric transformations inR2: A semiotic mediation perspective in a dynamic geometry environment. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01032-0
  • Wawro, M. (2014). Student reasoning about the invertible matrix theorem in linear algebra. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(3), 389–406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0579-x
  • Zandieh, M., Adiredja, A., & Knapp, J. (2019). Exploring everyday examples to explain basis: Insights into student understanding from students in Germany. Journal of ZDM: Mathematics Education. Springer, 51(7), 1153–1168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01033-z

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.