Contrasting undergraduate mathematics students’ approaches to learning and their interactions within two student-centred learning environments

References

• Alansari, M., & Rubie-Davies, C. (2020). What about the tertiary climate? Reflecting on five decades of class climate research. Learning Environments Research, 23(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09288-9
   Google Scholar
• Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM, 45(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
   Google Scholar
• Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9406-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1998). University mathematics students’ conceptions of mathematics. Studies in Higher Education, 23(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolmans, D., Loyens, S., Marcq, H., & Gijbels, D. (2016). Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 21(5), 1087–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9645-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring students’ approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 89–109). Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Peterson, E. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.08.009
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksen, H., & Hadjerrouit, S. (2020). An activity theory perspective on contradictions in flipped mathematics classrooms at the university level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(4), 520–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1591533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gijbels, D., Segers, M., & Struyf, E. (2008). Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning. Instructional Science, 36(5–6), 431–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (2016). Why do Chinese students out-perform those from the West? Do approaches to learning contribute to the explanation? Cogent Education, 3(1), 1248187. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1248187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the learning process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904773839879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogan, M., & Laursen, S. L. (2014). Assessing long-term effects of inquiry-based learning: A case study from college mathematics. Innovative Higher Education, 39(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-013-9269-9
   Google Scholar
• Konstantinou-Katzi, P., Tsolaki, E., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Koutselini, M. (2013). Differentiation of teaching and learning mathematics: An action research study in tertiary education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(3), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.714491
   Google Scholar
• Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students’ approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahdenperä, J., Postareff, L., & Rämö, L. (2019). Supporting quality of learning in university mathematics: A comparison of two instructional designs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lesseig, K., & Krouss, P. (2017). Implementing a flipped instructional model in college algebra: Profiles of student activity. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(2), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1233586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2013). Challenges in analysing chance on students' approaches to learning. In D. Gijbels, V. Donche, J. T. E. Richardson, & J. D. Vermunt (Eds.), Learning patterns in higher education: Dimensions and research perspectives (pp. 232–248). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A. M., & Postareff, L. (2018). What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence?. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2).
   Google Scholar
• Rämö, J., Reinholz, D., & Häsä, J., Lahdenperä, J. (2019). Extreme Apprenticeship: Instructional change as a gateway to systemic improvement. Innovative Higher Education, 44(5), 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejewski, W., & Merchant, S. (2016). Mathematical tasks, study approaches, and course grades in undergraduate mathematics: A year-by-year analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1072881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I – outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 39–58). Scottish Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mji, A. (2003). A three-year perspective on conceptions of and orientations to learning mathematics of prospective teachers and first year university students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 687–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739031000148949
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. E. L. (2017). Student approaches to learning, conceptions of mathematics, and successful outcomes in learning mathematics. In L. Wood & Y. Breyer (Eds.), Success in higher education (pp. 75–93). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Öhrstedt, M., & Lindfors, P. (2016). Students’ adoption of course-specific approaches to learning in two parallel courses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(2), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0256-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Using a research instrument for developing quality at the university. Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), 313–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.733493
   Google Scholar
• Parpala, A., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Komulainen, E., Litmanen, T., & Hirsto, L. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X476946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1987). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: The case for a relational perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078712331378062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Räisänen, M., Postareff, L., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2016). University students' self-and co-regulation of learning and processes of understanding: A person-oriented approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D., Rasmussen, C., & Nardi, E. (2020). Time for (research on) change in mathematics departments. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00116-7
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C., Fredriksen, H., Howard, E., Pepin, B., & Rämö, J. (2021). Students' in-class and out-of-class mathematical practices.. In V. Durand-Guerrier, R. Hochmut, E. Nardi, & C. Winsløw (Eds.), Research and development in university mathematics education: Overview produced by the International Network for Didactic Research in University Mathematics (pp. 216–237). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universities Act 558/2009. Issued 24th of July. (2009). in Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Wierstra, R., Kanselaar, G., van der Linden, J., Lodewijks, H., & Vermunt, J. (2003). The impact of the university context on European students’ learning approaches and learning environment preferences. Higher Education, 45(4), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023981025796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K., & Fowler, J. (2005). Assessing the impact of learning environments on students’ approaches to learning: Comparing conventional and action learning designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042003251770
   Google Scholar