Students’ understanding of parametric equations in a collaborative technology-enhanced learning environment

References

• Allen, K. (2006). Students’ participation in a differential equations class: Parametric reasoning to understand systems (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Beichner, R. J. (1990). The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics Lab. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, S., & John, A. (2008). Teaching high school students parametric functions through covariation. Unpublished masters project. Arizona State University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caglayan, G. (2015). Math majors’ visual proofs in a dynamic environment: The case of limit of a function and the ϵ–δ approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(6), 797–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1015465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsen, M. (2018). Upper secondary students’ mathematical reasoning on a sinusoidal function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9844-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. P., & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0808-x
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/4149958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çekmez, E. (2020). Establishing the link between the graph of a parametric curve and the derivatives of its component functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1663950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, A., Singletary, L. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(3), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9532-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czocher, J. A., Tague, J., & Baker, G. (2013). Where does the calculus go? An investigation of how calculus ideas are used in later coursework. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(5), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.780215
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
   Google Scholar
• Fiallo, J., & Gutiérrez, A. (2017). Analysis of the cognitive unity or rupture between conjecture and proof when learning to prove on a grade 10 trigonometry course. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9755-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, F. (2011). Construction of mathematical knowledge using graphic calculators (CAS) in the mathematics classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(6), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.583364
   Google Scholar
• Hitt, F., & González-Martín, A. (2015). Covariation between variables in a modelling process: The ACODESA (collaborative learning, scientific debate and self-reflexion) method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9578-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, F., Saboya, M., & Cortés-Zavala, C. (2017). Rupture or continuity: The arithmetico-algebraic thinking as an alternative in a modelling process in a paper and pencil and technology environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9717-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenwarter, M. (2006). Dynamic investigation of functions using GeoGebra. In Proceedings of Dresden International Symposium on Technology and its Integration into Mathematics Education, Dresden, Germany. DES-TIME.
   Google Scholar
• Hollebrands, K. F., Conner, A., & Smith, R. C. (2010). The nature of arguments provided by college geometry students with access to technology while solving problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 324–350. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.4.0324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L. (2015). Together yet separate: Students’ associating amounts of change in quantities involved in rate of change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9590-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L., & McClintock, E. (2018). A link between students’ discernment of variation in unidirectional change and their use of quantitative variational reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9799-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapp, D. A., & Cyrus, V. F. (2000). Using data-collection devices to enhance students’ understanding. Mathematics Teacher, 93(6), 504–510. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.93.6.0504
   Google Scholar
• Lapp, D. A., Ermete, M., Brackett, N., & Powell, K. (2013). Linked representations in algebra: Developing symbolic meaning. Mathematics Teacher, 107(4), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.4.0306
   Google Scholar
• Mariotti, M. A. (2009). Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective: The role of the teacher. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0199-z
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston. NCTM.
   Google Scholar
• Oehrtman, M. C., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that promote coherence in students’ function understanding. In M. P. Carlson, & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and practice in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 27–42). Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Pedemonte, B. (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9057-x
   Google Scholar
• Pedemonte, B., & Balacheff, N. (2016). Establishing links between conceptions, argumentation and proof through the ck-enriched Toulmin model. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusak, N., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2012). From visual reasoning to logical necessity through argumentative design. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9335-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2008). Theories in mathematics education: A brief inquiry into their conceptual differences. ICMI 11 Survey team 7: The notion and role of theory in mathematics education research. Retrieved Dec 20, 2018, from http://www.luisradford.ca/pub/31_radfordicmist7_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2018). On theories in mathematics education and their conceptual differences. In B. Sirakov, P. de Souza, & M. Viana (Eds.), Proceedings of the International congress of mathematicians (Vol. 4 (pp. 4055–4074). World Scientific Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Stalvey, H. E. (2014). The teaching and learning of parametric functions: A baseline study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Stalvey, H. E., & Vidakovic, D. (2015). Students’ reasoning about relationships between variables ina real-world problem. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. B., Weir, M. D., & Hass, J. R. (2010). Thomas calculus (12th ed). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (updated edition of the 1958 book). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turgut, M. (2019). Sense-making regarding matrix representation of geometric transformations in ℝ2: A semiotic mediation perspective in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 51(7), 1199–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01032-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zengin, Y. (2017). The potential of GeoGebra software for providing mathematical communication in the light of pre-service teachers’ views. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.356141
   Google Scholar
• Zengin, Y. (2018). Examination of the constructed dynamic bridge between the concepts of differential and derivative with the integration of GeoGebra and the ACODESA method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9832-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar