An investigation into the teaching of numeracy in subjects other than mathematics across the curriculum

References

• Abrahams, I., Reiss, M. J., & Sharpe, R. (2014). The impact of the ‘getting practical: Improving practical work in science’ continuing professional development programme on teachers’ ideas and practice in science practical work. Research in Science and Technological Education, 32(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.931841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew, M. (2015). Numeracy for the twenty-first century: A commentary. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0709-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy. Kings College.
   Google Scholar
• Bansilal, S., Webb, L., & James, A. (2015). Teacher training for mathematical literacy: A case study taking the past into the future. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/201503062356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennison, A. (2015a). Developing an analytic lens for investigating identity as an embedder-of-numeracy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0129-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennison, A. (2015b). Supporting teachers to embed numeracy across the curriculum: A sociocultural approach. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0706-3
   Google Scholar
• Bennison, A., Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2020). Utilising a research-informed instructional design approach to develop an online resource to support teacher professional learning on embedding numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 52(5), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01140-2
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1 cognitive domain. Longman Group Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Callingham, R., Beswick, K., & Ferme, E. (2015). An initial exploration of teachers’ numeracy in the context of professional capital. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0666-7
   Google Scholar
• Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Report of the committee of inquiry into the teaching of mathematics in schools. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, T. P. (2018). An investigation into the teaching of numeracy in subjects other than mathematics across the curriculum: A case study of a post-primary disadvantaged school in Ireland (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Collazo Rivera, G.L. (2020). The impact of project creation on learning mathematics in a transdisciplinary setting. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 405–421. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.405
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, G. (1959). A report of the central advisory Council for education. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J. (1996). Adult numeracy policy and research in Australia: The present context and future directions. ERIC. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED405485.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department of Basic Education. South Africa. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement: Grades 10-12, mathematical literacy. Department of Basic Education. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://www.education.gov.za/Portals/0/CD/National%20Curriculum%20Statements%20and%20Vocational/CAPS%20FET%20_%20MATHEMATICAL%20LITERACY%20_%20GR%2010-12%20_%20Web_DDA9.pdf?ver=2015-01-27-154330-293
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science (DES). (2005). DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) An action plan for educational inclusion. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/deis_action_plan_on_educational_inclusion.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2011a). Literacy and numeracy for learning and life: The national strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people 2011-2020. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/lit_num_strategy_full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2011b). An evaluation of planning processes in DEIS post-primary schools. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Inspection-Reports-Publications/Evaluation-Reports-Guidelines/insp_deis_post_primary_2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2012). School self-evaluation guidelines for post-primary schools. Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2015a). A joint report by the Education and Training Inspectorate and the Department of Education and Skills Inspectorate on promoting and improving numeracy in post-primary schools. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/Best-Practice-Guidelines-in-Numeracy-Provision-at-Post-Primary-Level.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2015b). Looking at action planning for improvement in DEIS post-primary schools: Inspectorate valuation Studies. Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2015c). Framework for Junior Cycle 2015. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-reports/Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2016). School self-evaluation guidelines 2016-2020 post-primary. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Inspection-Reports-Publications/Evaluation-Reports-Guidelines/School-Self-Evaluation-Guidelines-2016-2020-Post-Primary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2017a). National strategy: Literacy and numeracy for earning and life 2011-2020 interim review: 2011-2016 new targets: 2017-2020. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/pub_ed_interim_review_literacy_numeracy_2011_2020.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2017b). DEIS action plan 2017 delivering equality of opportunity in schools. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/DEIS-Plan-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2017c). Stem Education Policy Statement 2017-2026. Dublin. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.education.ie/en/The-Education-System/STEM-Education-Policy/stem-education-policy-statement-2017-2026-.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, K. (2010). Reading, maths skills of students shows alarming fall. Irish Independent. 8 December. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.independent.ie/life/family/learning/reading-maths-skills-of-irish-students-show-alarming-fall-26604509.html.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferme, E. (2014). What can other areas teach us about numeracy? Australian Mathematics Teacher, 70(4), 28–34. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1093260.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. (2010). Ireland drops in literacy rankings. The Irish Times. 7 December. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland-drops-in-literacy-rankings-1.868428.
   Google Scholar
• Forgasz, H. J., & Hall, J. (2019). Learning about numeracy: The impact of a compulsory unit on Pre-service teachers’ understandings and beliefs. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v44n2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G., & Hall, J. (2017). Numeracy across the curriculum in Australian schools: Teacher education students’ and practicing teachers’ views and understandings of numeracy. Numeracy, 10(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.10.2.2
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, M., & Faragher, R. (2010). Sustaining improvement in numeracy: Developing pedagogical content knowledge and leadership capabilities in tandem. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 12(2), 72–83. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ940922.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2000). Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., & Goos, M. (2015a). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the twenty-first century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM- International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0708-1
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., & Goos, M. (2015b). A critical orientation to numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0648-1
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M. (2007). New tools, new learners … new numeracies? In: Keynote address delivered at the South Australian Literacy and Numeracy Expo, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: A professional development approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0008-1
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012a). Numeracy across the curriculum. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(1), 3–8. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ974975.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2012b). Auditing the numeracy demands of the middle years curriculum. PNA, 6(4), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v6i4.6138
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F.-L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics Education May prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51. Available at https://search-ebscohost-com.proxy.library.lincoln.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=507749030&site=ehost-live (Accessed 20 September 2021)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J., & Bonne, L. (2011). Configurations of instructional leadership enactments that promote the teaching and learning of mathematics in a New Zealand elementary school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 794–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11413763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9333-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8(3), 279–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennison, M., & Beswick, K. (2010). Student attitude, student understanding and mathematics anxiety. In: Shaping the future of mathematics education. Proceedings of the annual conference of the mathematics education research group of australasia, Freemantle, Western Australia, Australia, 3-7 July. Adelaide, Australia: ERIC, 280–288.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., Walshe, G., & Ní Ríordáin, M. (2020). Supporting key aspects of practice in Making mathematics explicit in science lessons. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10016-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: Self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 995–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, F. (2014). Evaluating the impact of teacher professional development: An evidence-based framework. Professional Development in Education, 40(1), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.823099
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. (1959). Techniques for evaluating training programmes. Journal of ASTD, 13(11), 1–13. https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1735231
   Google Scholar
• Maass, K., Geiger, V., Ariza, M. R., & Goos, M. (2019). The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary STEM education. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 51(6), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01100-5
   Google Scholar
• Madison, B. L., & Steen, L. A. (2008). Evolution of numeracy and the national numeracy network. Numeracy, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.1.1.2
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 575–596). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, G., & O’Hara, J. (2006). Workable compromise or pointless exercise? School-based evaluation in the Irish context. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 34(4), 564–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143206068218
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (1999). Primary school curriculum: Mathematics. Government of Ireland. Retrieved August 1, 2019, from http://www.curriculumonline.ie/getmedia/9df5f3c5-257b-471e-8d0f-f2cf059af941/PSEC02_Mathematics_Curriculum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2013). Junior Certificate mathematics syllabus foundation, ordinary and higher level. NCCA.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Ríordáin, M., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2016). Making mathematics and science integration happen: Key aspects of practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1078001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, M. (2017). In pursuit of an orientation for life-preparation: A case study of the subject mathematical literacy in South Africa. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1364045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Breacháin, A., & O'Toole, L. (2013). Pedagogy or politics? Cyclical Trends in Literacy and Numeracy in Ireland and Beyond. Irish Educational Studies, 32(4), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2013.85144
   Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, J. (2003). Mathematics or numeracy: Does it really matter. Adults Learning Maths Newsletter, 18, 1–4. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://www.alm-online.net/images/ALM/newsletters/news18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do-student performance in mathematics, reading and science volume 1 (revised edition, February 2014). OECD Publishing. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-I.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 results (volume I): what students know and can do. OECD Publishing. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/5f07c754-en.pdf?expires=1613696359&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=DC8F14945CC5FF64BC5C5732F5129504.
   Google Scholar
• Pankake, A., & Moller, G. (2007). What the teacher leader needs from the principal. Journal of Staff Development, 28(1), 32–34. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ752289&site=ehost–live
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, R., Shiel, G., Merriman, B., Cosgrove, J., & Moran, G. (2013). Learning for life: The achievements of 15-year-olds in Ireland on mathematics, reading literacy and science in PISA 2012. Educational Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the Joy in the unknown”: implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school Science and Math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupnik, D., & Avsec, S. (2020). Effects of a transdisciplinary Educational approach on students’ Technological literacy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2013). Teachers as leaders in Finland. Educational Leadership, 7(2), 36–41. Retrieved September 19th 2021, from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/teachers-as-leaders-in-finland
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., & Howell Major, C. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034004014
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching:Foundations of the New reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, E., McCoy, S., & Kingston, G. (2015). Learning from the evaluation of DEIS. The Economic and Social Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (1997). Why numbers count: Quantitative literacy for tomorrow's America. College Entrance Examination Board.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (1999). Numeracy: The new literacy for a data-drenched society. Educational Leadership, 57(2), 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and numeracy: Two literacies, one language. The Mathematics Educator, 6(1), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stoehr, K. J. (2017). Mathematics anxiety one size does not fit all. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116676316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1005106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, S., & Hogan, J. (2004). Orientations to numeracy: Teachers’ confidence and disposition to use mathematics across the curriculum. In M. J. Hoines, & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International group for the psychology of mathematics education, bergen Norway, 14-18 July (Vol. 4, pp. 313–320). University College.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Venkat, H., & Winter, M. (2015). Boundary objects and boundary crossing for numeracy teaching. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0683-6
   Google Scholar
• Walshe, G., Johnston, J., & Goos, M. (2020). Promoting twenty-first century skills through STEM integration: A comparative analysis of national curricula. In L. Leite, E. Oldham, A. S. Afonso, F. Viseu, L. Dourado, & M. H. Martinho (Eds.), Science and mathematics education for twenty-first century citizens: Challenges and ways forward. (Chapter 13). Nova Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H.-H., Charoenmuang, M., Knobloch, N. A., & Tormoehlen, R. L. (2020). Defining interdisciplinary collaboration based on high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of STEM integration using a complex designed system. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(3), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0201-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withnall, A. (1995). Towards a definition of numeracy. Adults learning mathematics-a research forum, and ALM. In D. Coben (Ed.), Proceedings of the inaugural conference of adults learning maths-a research forum (pp. 11–17). Fircroft College. 22-24 July 1994. Goldsmith's College: University of London, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Technologizing numeracy: Intergenerational differences in working mathematically in new times. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028399.76056.91
   Google Scholar