References
- Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
- Berk, R. A. (1996). Student ratings of 10 strategies for using humor in college teaching. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 7(3), 71–92.
- Berney, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2016). Does animation enhance learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 101, 150–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.005
- Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & sons.
- De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21(2), 113–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
- Dunn, P. K., McDonald, C., & Loch, B. (2015). Statscasts: Screencasts for complementing lectures in statistics classes. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 521–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.990530
- Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 69–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1401_4
- Hall, B., Loch, B., Rowlands, W., Cook, E., Edwards, T., & Borland, R. (2017). Will students watch Physcasts if they are not assessed? Paper presented at the Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference).
- Horikoshi, R. (2020). Teaching chemistry with LEGO® bricks. Chemistry Teacher International, 1(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2020-0017
- Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722–738. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
- James, A., & Nerantzi, C. (2018). Guest editors: A potpourri of innovative applications of LEGO® in learning, teaching and development. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 5(4), 153–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.54.18-011
- Jordan, C., Loch, B., Lowe, T., Mestel, B., & Wilkins, C. (2012). Do short screencasts improve student learning of mathematics. MSOR Connections, 12(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11120/msor.2012.12010011
- Kay, R., & Kletskin, I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education. Computers & Education, 59(2), 619–627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.007
- Kher, N., Molstad, S., & Donahue, R. (1999). Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness in ‘dread courses’. College Student Journal, 33(3), 400–400.
- LEGO®. (2014). A system for learning. https://education.lego.com/v3/assets/blt293eea581807678a/bltc6169ff5a6b89a0a/5f86ec84c4805b1a2cea4dfa/lego-education-manifesto.pdf
- LEGO®. (2021). LEGO® education community. https://community.legoeducation.com/home
- Loch, B., Jordan, C. R., Lowe, T. W., & Mestel, B. D. (2014). Do screencasts help to revise prerequisite mathematics? An investigation of student performance and perception. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822581
- Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
- Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterisation of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 781–794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.001
- Ruzzenente, M., Koo, M., Nielsen, K., Grespan, L., & Fiorini, P. (2012). A review of robotics kits for tertiary education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Workshop Teaching Robotics Teaching with Robotics: Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum, Riva del Garda (Trento, Italy) April 20, 2012.
- Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.01.009
- Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Schuh, J. (2010). The acquisition of problem-solving skills in mathematics: How animations can aid understanding of structural problem features and solution procedures. Instructional Science, 38(5), 487–502. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9114-9
- Stewart, S., Andrews-Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2019). Linear algebra teaching and learning: Themes from recent research and evolving research priorities. ZDM, 51(7), 1017–1030. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01104-1