Diving deep into numeracy, cross-curricular professional development

References

• Askew, M. (2015). Numeracy for the 21st century: A commentary. ZDM, 47(4), 707–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0709-0
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D., Street, B., & Tomlin, A. (2003). Mathematics as social: Understanding relationships between home and school numeracy practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 11–15. www.jstor.org/stable/40248426.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2012). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barwell, R. (2004). What is numeracy? For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(1), 22–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248441.
   Google Scholar
• Bennison, A. (2015). Supporting teachers to embed numeracy across the curriculum: A sociocultural approach. ZDM, 47(4), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0706-3
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blignaut, S. (2008). Teachers’ sense-making and enactment of curriculum policy. Journal of Education, 43(1), 101–125.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects? State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00302716
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 7(2), 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1973). Going beyond the information given. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Cartier, S. C. (2013). Layers of self- and co-regulation: Teachers working collaboratively to support adolescents’ self-regulated learning through reading. Education Research International, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/845694
   Google Scholar
• Catanzaro, M. (1988). Using qualitative analytical techniques. In N. Woods and M. Catanzaro (Eds.), Nursing research: Theory and practice (pp. 437–456), Mosby Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockcroft, W. H. (1982). Mathematics count. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, P., and Sharpe, R. (2021). An investigation into the teaching of numeracy in subjects other than mathematics across the curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1978570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, G. J., Conboy, K., & Donnellan, B. (2015). Reflections on” reflection” in Action Research. In 15th European Academy of Management Conference (EURAM).
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, T., & McKernan, J. (1984). The challenge of change: Curriculum development in Irish post-primary schools 1970-1984. Inst of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• DES. (2011). Literacy and numeracy for learning and life. Department of Education and Skills. http://www.education.ie/en/publications/policy-reports/lit_num_strategy_full.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DES. (2015). A joint report by the education and training Inspectorate and the Department of Education and Skills Inspectorate on promoting and improving numeracy across the curriculum in post-primary schools. Department of Education and Skills. https://assets.gov.ie/24763/38a5f75a1efe40-66bec9b18c6bf3bd75.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DES. (2016a). Looking at our school 2016 – a quality framework for post-primary schools. Department of Education and Skills. https://assets.gov.ie/25260/4a47d32bf7194c9987ed42cd898e612d.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DES. (2016b). STEM education in the Irish school system. Department of Education and Skills. https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Education-Reports/STEM-Education-in-the-Irish-School-System.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Towards better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2014). Teachers’ mindsets:“every student has something to teach Me” feeling overwhelmed? Where did your natural teaching talent go? Try pairing a growth mindset with reasonable goals, patience, and reflection instead. It’s time to get gritty and be a better teacher. Educational Horizons, 93(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013175X14561420
   Google Scholar
• Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T., Ní Chróinín, D., & O’Sullivan, M. (2016). A layered approach to critical friendship as a means to support pedagogical innovation in pre-service teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 12(3), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2016.1228049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furrer, C. J., Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2014). The influence of teacher and peer relationships on students' classroom engagement and everyday motivational resilience. In D. Shernoff, & J. Bempechat (Eds.), National society for the study of education yearbook: Engaging youth in schools: Evidence–based models to guide future innovations (pp. 101–123). Teachers College Record.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2014). Curriculum intent, teacher professional development and student learning in numeracy. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 473–492) Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_22.
   Google Scholar
• Gerofsky, S. (1996). A linguistic and narrative view of word problems in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16, 36–45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248203.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2011). Improving numeracy education in rural schools: A professional development approach. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0008-1
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., Geiger, V., Dole, S., Forgasz, H., & Bennison, A. (2019). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based strategies for enhancing teaching and learning (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003116585.
   Google Scholar
• Grønmo, L. S., Lindquist, M., Arora, A., & Mullis, I. V. (2015). TIMSS 2015 mathematics framework. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/downloads/t15_fw_chap1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, G., Stevens, T., & Higgins, R. (2011). A professional development model for middle school teachers of mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(7), 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2011.611908
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imants, J., & Van der Wal, M. M. (2020). A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1604809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, S. J. (2006). Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers. Educational Research, 48(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. V. (2009). The curriculum: Theory and practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J., & Stevens, D. (2008). Action research in teacher education: Two teacher-educators practice action research as they introduce action research to preservice teachers. Action Research, 6(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307083716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, G., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking 1: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(4), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lytle, S. L., & Fecho, R. (1991). Meeting strangers in familiar places: Teacher collaboration by cross-visitation. English Education, 23(1), 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• März, V., & Kelchtermans, G. (2013). Sense-making and structure in teachers’ reception of educational reform. A case study on statistics in the mathematics curriculum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morony, W., Hogan, J., & Thornton, S. (2004). Australian national schools network (ANSN) Snapshot: Numeracy across the curriculum. ANSN.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, E. (2015). Improving teaching through collaborative reflective teaching cycles. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(3), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2015.11790343.
   Google Scholar
• NCCA. (2009). Key skills framework. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). http://www.ncca.ie/en/Curriculum_and_Assessment/Post-Primary_Education/Senior_Cycle/Key_Skills_Framework/KS_Framework.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. E., Edwards, L. D., & Filipe Matos, J. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003759711966
   Google Scholar
• O'donoghue, J. (2002). Numeracy and mathematics. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 48, 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• O'donoghue, J. (2018). Mathematics education and adult learners in Ireland. In K. Safford-Ramus, J. Maaß, & E. Süss-Stepancik (Eds.), Contemporary research in adult and lifelong learning of mathematics (pp. 39–59). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PDST. (2015). The professional development service for teachers strategic plan 2015-2020. Professional Development Service for Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. A., & Single, H. M. (1996). Focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 8(5), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning and teaching problem solving. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., & Biesta, G. J. J. (2013). Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187–206). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Roux, A. L. (1979). Numeracy: An alternate definition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 10(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739790100305
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H. (2000). Interdisciplinary team teaching as a form of professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 27(3), 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Fostering communities of teachers as learners: Disciplinary perspectives. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000135049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L., & Shulman, J. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000148298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skemp, R. R. (1983). The silent music of mathematics. Mathematics Teaching, 102(58), 287–288.
   Google Scholar
• Sleegers, P. J. C., Thoonen, E. E. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2014). Changing classroom practices: The role of school-wide capacity for sustainable improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(5), 617–652. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2013-0126
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667402
   Google Scholar
• SRI. (2019). Professional learning models to support student success in mathematics. Regional Education Laboratory Program. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/appalachia/blogs/blog15_pl-models-support-student-success-in-math.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (1999). Numeracy: The new literacy for a data-drenched society. Educational Leadership, 57(2), 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. 1–22). National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
   Google Scholar
• Teaching Council. (2016). Cosán framework for teachers’ learning development process (2016-2020). https://www.teachingcouncil.ie/en/Publications/Teacher-Education/Cosan-Development-Process.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S., & Hogan, J. (2004). Orientations to numeracy: Teacher's confidence and disposition to use mathematics across the curriculum. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Paper presented at the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B., Ogonowski, M., & Pothier, S. (2005). “Everyday” and “scientific”: Rethinking dichotomies in modes of thinking in science learning. In R. Nemirovsky, A. S. Rosebery, & B. Warren (Eds.), Everyday matters in science and mathematics (pp. 119–152). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, X., & Buck, G. A. (2019). Using a collaborative action research approach to negotiate an understanding of formative assessment in an era of accountability testing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 80, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar