Using a constraint-based expert model to provide step-level feedback for user-inputted mathematics equations

References

• Aleven, V., Mclaren, B. M., Sewall, J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). A new paradigm for intelligent tutoring systems: Example-tracing tutors. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 19(2), 105–154.
   Google Scholar
• AlShaikh, F., & Hewahi, N. (2021, September 29–30). Ai and machine learning techniques in the development of Intelligent Tutoring System: A review. 2021 International Conference on innovation and Intelligence for informatics, computing, and technologies (3ICT). (pp. 403-410). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, S. W., Deardorff, D. L., & Beichner, R. J. (2003). Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1050–1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, R., Davenport, J. H., & Sangwin, C. (2010). A comparison of equality in computer algebra and correctness in mathematical pedagogy (II). International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Corbalan, G., Paas, F., & Cuypers, H. (2010). Computer-based feedback in linear algebra: Effects on transfer performance and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. D., Hu, X., Graesser, A. C., Bargagliotti, A. E., Sterbinsky, A., Cheney, K. R., & Okwumabua, T. (2013). The impact of a technology-based mathematics after-school program using ALEKS on student's knowledge and behaviors. Computers & Education, 68, 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devedzic, V., & Harrer, A. (2005). Software patterns in ITS architectures. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(2), 63–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hauk, S., Powers, R. A., & Segalla, A. (2015). A comparison of Web-based and paper-and-pencil homework on student performance in College algebra. Primus, 25(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2014.906006
   Google Scholar
• Kodaganallur, V., Weitz, R. R., & Rosenthal, D. (2005). A comparison of model-tracing and constraint-based intelligent tutoring paradigms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15(2), 117–144.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, K. E., & Alexander, N. (2014). College students attitude and mathematics achievement using Web based homework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(6), 609–615. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1220a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclellan, C. J., Harpstead, E., Patel, R., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). The Apprentice Learner architecture: Closing the loop between learning theory and educational data. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 151–158.
   Google Scholar
• MacLellan, C. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Domain-General Tutor authoring with Apprentice Learner models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00214-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, N., Cohen, W. W., & Koedinger, K. R. (2015). Teaching the teacher: Tutoring SimStudent leads to more effective Cognitive Tutor authoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0020-1
   Google Scholar
• Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., & Suraweera, P. (2007). Intelligent tutors for all: The constraint-based approach. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 4, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.74
   Google Scholar
• Mondigo, L., & Lao, D. M. (2017). E-learning for introductory computer science concept on recursion applying two types of feedback methods in the learning assessment. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 12(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-02-2017-0019
   Google Scholar
• Murray, T. (2003). An overview of Intelligent Tutoring system authoring tools: Updated analysis of the state of the art. In T. Murray, S. Blessing, & S. Ainsworth (Eds.), Authoring tools for advanced technology learning environments (pp. 491–544). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nkambou, R., Mizoguchi, R., & Bourdeau, J. (2010). Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan, Z. A., & Budak, S. (2021). A comparison of students’ preferences in online algebra instruction Pre-and post-COVID-19. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i17.23579
   Google Scholar
• Vanlehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227–265.
   Google Scholar
• VanLehn, K., Lnch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J. A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., … Wintersgill, M. (2005). The Andes physics tutoring system: Five years of evaluations. Naval Academy., 1-47.
   Google Scholar
• Yourstone, S. A., Kraye, H. S., & Albaum, G. (2008). Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00166.x
   Google Scholar