E-assessment in mathematics in higher education: a student perspective

References

• Appiah, M., & Van Tonder, F. (2019, April 11–13). Students’ perceptions of E-assessment at a higher education institution. 5th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design, ICCED 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED46541.2019.9161088
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, J. M., Oliveira, E. P., & Beites, P. D. (2017, April 21–23). How do mathematics teachers in higher education look at E-assessment with multiple-choice questions. In CSEDU 2017 – Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 137–145). https://doi.org/10.5220/0006324801370145
   Google Scholar
• Barana, A., & Marchisio, M. (2016). Ten good reasons to adopt an automated formative assessment model for learning and teaching mathematics and scientific disciplines. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.093
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2017). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 672–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105
   Google Scholar
• Brady, M., Devitt, A., & Kiersey, R. A. (2019). Academic staff perspectives on technology for assessment (TfA) in higher education: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3080–3098. https://doi.org/10.1111/BJET.12742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, D. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2020). Council conclusions on countering the COVID-19 crisis in education and training (2020/C 212 I/03). Official Journal of the European Union (C 212 I/9).
   Google Scholar
• Cox, W. (2003). A MATH-KIT for engineers. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 22(4), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/TEAMAT/22.4.193
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, K. J. (2012). Introduction to mathematical thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Divjak, B., & Erjavec, Z. (2008). Enhancing mathematics for informatics and its correlation with student pass rates. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 39(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390601002732
   Google Scholar
• Divjak, B., Kadoic, N., & Zugec, B. (2021, May 17–20). The use of decision-making methods to ensure assessment validity. 2021 IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Conference – Europe, TEMSCON-EUR 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMSCON-EUR52034.2021.9488580
   Google Scholar
• Draper, S. W. (2009). What are learners actually regulating when given feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00930.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding student learning. Routledge Revivals.
   Google Scholar
• Figueroa-Cañas, J., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2021). Investigating the relationship between optional quizzes and final exam performance in a fully asynchronous online calculus module. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1559864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. A., Veiga Simão, A. M., Barros, A., & Pereira, D. (2015). Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: A study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 40(9), 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluck, A. E. (2019). An international review of eExam technologies and impact. Computers & Education, 132, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, A., Haase, V. G., & Räsänen, P. (Eds.). (2019). International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerritsen-van Leeuwenkamp, K. J., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kester, L. (2017). Assessment quality in tertiary education: An integrative literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 55, 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, J. M., Lou, N. M., Liu, Y., Cutumisu, M., Daniels, L. M., Leighton, J. P., & Nadon, L. (2021). University students’ negative emotions in a computer-based examination: The roles of trait test-emotion, prior test-taking methods and gender. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 956–972. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1836123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harskamp, E., & Suhre, C. (2007). Schoenfeld’s problem solving theory in a student controlled learning environment. Computers and Education, 49(3), 822–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2005.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, N. (2015). Student perceptions of their learning and engagement in response to the use of a continuous e-assessment in an undergraduate module. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.881978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R., Li, Y., & He, X. (2010). What constitutes effective mathematics instruction: A comparison of Chinese expert and novice teachers’ views. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.524965
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 840–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, S. (2013). E-assessment: Past, present and future. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 9(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.11120/ndir.2013.00009
   Google Scholar
• Krumsvik, R. J., & Ludvigsen, K. (2012). Formative E-assessment in plenary lectures. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn1891-943x-2012-01-04
   Google Scholar
• Kuikka, M., Kitola, M., & Laakso, M. J. (2014). Challenges when introducing electronic exam. Research in Learning Technology, 22, https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22817
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(44), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, P. D. S. N., Silva, L. D. A., Felix, I. M., & Brandao, L. D. O. (2019, October 16–19). Difficulties in basic concepts of mathematics in higher education: A systematic review. Proceedings – Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028658
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8279.1976.TB02980.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: Student views and staff reflections. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellar, H., Peytcheva-Forsyth, R., Kocdar, S., Karadeniz, A., & Yovkova, B. (2018). Addressing cheating in e-assessment using student authentication and authorship checking systems: Teachers’ perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 14(2), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0025-x
   Google Scholar
• Mimirinis, M. (2019). Qualitative differences in academics’ conceptions of e-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1493087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, M. C., Sancho-Bru, J. L., Iserte, J. L., & Sánchez, F. T. (2012). An e-assessment approach for evaluation in engineering overcrowded groups. Computers & Education, 59(2), 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2012.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Arcavi, A. (1993). Aspects of understanding: On multiple perspectives and representations of linear relations and connections amount them. In T. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research in the graphical representation of function (pp. 69–100). Lawerence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Newsom. (2020). Some clarifications and recommendations on fit indices. Psy 523/623 Structural Equation Modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Noguera, I., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., Rodríguez, M. E., & Baneres, D. (2019). Students’ and instructors’ perspectives regarding e-assessment: A case study in introductory digital systems. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2), 473–490. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6865358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). The state of higher education: One year into the COVID-19 pandemic.
   Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54(3), 715–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2009.09.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1988). Context and strategy: Situational influences on learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 159–184). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (2005). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Rencher, A. C. (2002). Methods of multivariate analysis. J. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Romeu Fontanillas, T., Romero Carbonell, M., & Guitert Catasús, M. (2016). E-assessment process: Giving a voice to online learners. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(20), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlett, P. (2020). Partially-automated individualized assessment of higher education mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1822554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senel, S., & Senel, H. C. (2021). Remote assessment in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.820140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siregar, R., & Siagian, M. D. (2019). Mathematical connection ability: Teacher’s perception and experience in learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012041
   Google Scholar
• Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., & Sampson, D. G. (2016). Digital systems supporting cognition and exploratory learning in twenty-first century: Guest editorial. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12528-016-9114-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Teoha, S. H., Koo, A. C., & Singh, P. (2010). Extracting factors for students’ motivation in studying mathematics. 41(6), 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207391003675190
   Google Scholar
• Timmis, S., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., & Oldfield, A. (2016). Rethinking assessment in a digital age: Opportunities, challenges and risks. British Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 454–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinoca, L., Pereira, A., & Oliveira, I. (2013). A conceptual framework for e-assessment in higher education: Authenticity, consistency, transparency, and practicability. In S. Mukerji & P. Tripathi (Eds.), Handbook of research on transnational higher education (pp. 652–673). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4458-8.ch033
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J., de Boer, W., Folmer, E., Kuiper, W., Letschert, J., Nieveen, N., & Thijs, A. (2009). Curriculum in development (A. Thijs & J. van den Akker, Eds.).
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1996). The assessment of professional competence: Developments, research and practical implications. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00596229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Schuwirth, L. W. T. (2005). Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2929.2005.02094.X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-020-01130-4
   Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D. M. (2007). Computer assisted formative assessment: Supporting students to become more reflective learners. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Based Learning in Science (CBLIS ‘07) (pp. 492–504). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S., Chugh, R., & Sawir, E. (2016). A pilot study of an electronic exam system at an Australian University. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516646746
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., & Rees, R. (2021). “Check the grade, log out”: Students’ engagement with feedback in learning management systems. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar