Experienced provers’ uses of contexts while engaging in combinatorial proof of binomial identities

References

• Annin, S. A., & Lai, K. S. (2010). Common errors in counting problems. The Mathematics Teacher, 103(6), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.103.6.0402
   Google Scholar
• Balacheff, N. (2009). Bridging knowing and proving in mathematics: A didactical perspective. In H. Pulte, G. Hanna, & H. J. Jahnke (Eds.), Explanation and proof in mathematics: Philosophical and educational perspectives (pp. 115–135). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Batanero, C., Navarro-Pelayo, V., & Godino, J. (1997). Effect of the implicit combinatorial model on combinatorial reasoning in secondary school pupils. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002954428327
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• De Chenne, A., & Lockwood, E. (2022). A task to connect counting processes to lists of outcomes in combinatorics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eizenberg, M. M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2004). Students’ verification strategies for combinatorial problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0601_2
   Google Scholar
• Engelke Infante, N., & CadwalladerOlsker, T. (2011, November 27–December 2). Student difficulties in the production of combinatorial proofs. Delta Communications, Volcanic Delta Conference Proceedings, November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. (1991). Young children's combinatorics strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(5), 451–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367908
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, S. (2020). Investigating provers’ understandings of combinatorial proof [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, S. A., & Lockwood, E. (2021b). Investigating combinatorial provers’ reasoning about multiplication. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(1), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s50753-020-00123-8
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, S., & Lockwood, E. (2021a). Investigating undergraduate students’ proof schemes and perspectives about combinatorial proof. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1988). The combinatorial solving capacity in children and adolescents. ZDM, 5, 193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1/3), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
   Google Scholar
• Hadar, N., & Hadass, R. (1981). The road to solving a combinatorial problem is strewn with pitfalls. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(4), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308141
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01809605
   Google Scholar
• Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 7, 234–283. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/007/07
   Google Scholar
• Hersh, R. (1993). Proving is convincing and explaining. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273372
   Google Scholar
• Höveler, K. (2017). Children’s combinatorial counting strategies and their relationship to conventional mathematical counting principles. In E. W. Hart & J. Sandefur (Eds.), Teaching and learning discrete mathematics worldwide: Curriculum and research (pp. 81–92). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hunting, R. P. (1997). Clinical interview methods in mathematics education research and practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90023-7
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, Y. (2011). Geometrical meaning of arithmetic series in terms of the elementary combinatorics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 42(5), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.550943
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, Y. (2013). Recursion formulae of 1ℓ +2 ℓ +···+n ℓ and their combinatoric meaning in terms of the tree diagrams. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(1), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.662298
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. M. (2013). Introduction to smooth manifolds (2nd ed.). In S. Axler & K. Ribet (Eds.), Graduate texts in mathematics (218 vol., pp. 304–326). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., Caughman, J. S., & Weber, K. (2020a). An essay on proof, conviction, and explanation: Multiple representation systems in combinatorics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09933-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., & Erickson, S. (2017). Undergraduate students’ initial conceptions of factorials. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1259517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., & Gibson, B. (2016). Combinatorial tasks and outcome listing: Examining productive listing among undergraduate students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9664-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., & Reed, Z. (2016). Students’ meanings of a (potentially) powerful tool for generalizing in combinatorics. In T. Fukawa-Connelly, N. Infante, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19^th annual conference on research on undergraduate mathematics education, (pp. 1–16. West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., Reed, Z., & Erickson, S. (2021). Undergraduate students’ combinatorial proof of binomial identities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 52(5), 539–580. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2021-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., Swinyard, C. A., & Caughman, J. S. (2015). Patterns, sets of outcomes, and combinatorial justification: Two students’ reinvention of counting formulas. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 27–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0001-2
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., Wasserman, N. H., & Tillema, E. S. (2020b). A case for combinatorics: A research commentary. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A., Powell, A. B., & Uptegrove, E. B. (eds.). (2011). Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying and building isomorphisms. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A., & Speiser, R. (1997). How far can you go with block towers? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(97)90021-3
   Google Scholar
• Medová, J., Bulková, K. O., & Čeretková, S. (2020). Relations between generalization, reasoning and combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical open-ended problems within mathematical contest. Mathematics, 8(12), 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muter, E. M., & Uptegrove, E. B. (2011). Representations and connections. In C. A. Maher, A. B. Powell, & E. B. Uptegrove (Eds.), Combinatorics and reasoning: Representing, justifying and building isomorphisms (pp. 105–120). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, Z., & Lockwood, E. (2021). Leveraging a categorization activity to facilitate productive generalizing activity and combinatorial reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 39(4), 409–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1887192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, E. S. (2013). A power meaning of multiplication: Three eighth graders’ solutions of Cartesian product problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Tillema, E. S. (2018). An investigation of 6th graders’ solutions of combinatorics problems and representation of these problems using arrays. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, E. S., & Gatza, A. (2016). A quantitative and combinatorial approach to non-linear meanings of multiplication. For the Learning of Mathematics, 36(2), 26–33.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, N. H. (2019). Duality in combinatorial notation. For the Learning of Mathematics, 39(3), 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K. (2010). Mathematics majors’ perceptions of conviction, validity, and proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(4), 306–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2010.495468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2004). Semantic and syntactic proof production. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(3), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000040410.57253.a1
   Google Scholar
• Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2009). Semantic and syntactic reasoning and proving in advanced mathematics classrooms. Invited chapter on research on proof at the undergraduate level for. In M. Blanton, D. Stylinaiou, & E. Knuth (Eds.), The teaching and learning of proof across the K-16 curriculum (pp. 323–338). Routledge.
   Google Scholar