The role of textbooks for supporting instruction with inquiry: the case of Active Calculus

References

• Alayont, F. (2014). Using problem-based pre-class activities to prepare students for in-class learning. PRIMUS, 24(2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2013.844510
   Google Scholar
• Beezer, R., Judson, T., Farmer, D., Morrison, K., Mesa, V., & Lynds, S. (2018). Undergraduate Teaching and learning in Mathematics with Open Software and Textbooks (UTMOST) (National Science Foundation, DUE 1821706,1821329,1821509,1821114) [Grant].
   Google Scholar
• Bennoun, S., & Holm, T. (2021). Establishing consistent active learning in a calculus I course. PRIMUS, 31(3-5), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1746453
   Google Scholar
• Boelkins, M. (2019). Active Calculus. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Mesa, V. (2012). Inquiry based learning project: Summary of focus groups, Fall 2012 [Technical Report]. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Carreon, F., DeBacker, S., Kessenich, P., Kubena, A., & LaRose, P. G. (2018). What is old is new again: A systemic approach to the challenges of calculus instruction. PRIMUS, 28(6), 476–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2017.1315474
   Google Scholar
• Clontz, S., & Lewis, D., Eds. (2023). Calculus for team-based inquiry learning: 2023 Early Edition. https://teambasedinquirylearning.github.io/calculus/2023e/cal1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025002119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, P. C. (2014). How students interpret and enact inquiry-oriented defining practices in undergraduate real analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, D. C., Hodge, A., & Yoshinobu, S. (2017). What is inquiry-based learning? Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 64(6), 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1536
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: The China lectures. Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2016). Responsibility for proving and defining in abstract algebra class. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(5), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1114159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, M., & Shorter, P. (n.d.). IBL Calculus: Concepts and applications. https://www.iblcalculus.com/home.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M., & von Renesse, C. (2017). A path to designing inquiry activities in mathematics. PRIMUS, 27(7), 646–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1211203
   Google Scholar
• Haberler, Z., Laursen, S. L., & Hayward, C. N. (2018). What's in a name? Framing struggles of a mathematics education reform community. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(3), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0079-4
   Google Scholar
• Hass, J., Heil, C., & Weir, M. (2017). Thomas’ calculus (14th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/749690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, D. S. (2022). Examining opportunities to learn limit in widely used calculus textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10273-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Caughman, J., Fredericks, J., & Gibson, L. (2013). Implementing inquiry-oriented curriculum: From the mathematicians’ perspective. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 743–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Keller, R., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2018). Results from a survey of abstract algebra instructors across the United States: Understanding the choice to (not) lecture. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(2), 254–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0058-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuster, G., Johnson, E., Rupnow, R., & Garrrison Wilhelm, A. (2019). The inquiry-oriented instructional measure. International Journal for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00089-2
   Google Scholar
• Lamm, R., Mesa, V., Duranczyk, I., Kohli, N., Watkins, L., & Ström, A. (2022). Construct validation of an instrument that assesses quality of instruction in community college algebra. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2022.2132430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., Johnson, E., & Bartlo, J. (2013). Designing and scaling up an innovation in abstract algebra. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 693–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. (2019). Levers for change: An assessment of progress on changing STEM instruction. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S., Hassi, M.-L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6
   Google Scholar
• Leinwand, S. (2014). Principles to action: Ensuring mathematical success for all. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Liakos, Y., Gerami, S., Mesa, V., Judson, T., & Ma, Y. (2021). How an inquiry-oriented textbook shaped a calculus instructor’s planning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1961171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litke, E. G. (2015). The state of the gate: A description of instructional practice in algebra in five urban districts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, E., Johnson, E., & Larsen, S. (2013). Developing instructor support materials for an inquiry-oriented curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(4), 776–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.010
   Google Scholar
• Love, E., & Pimm, D. (1996). ‘This is so’: A text on texts. In A. J. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 371–409). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa, V., & Griffiths, B. (2012). Textbook mediation of teaching: An example from tertiary mathematics instructors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9339-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. L., Beezer, R. A., & Farmer, D. W. (2018). A new generation of mathematics textbook research and development. ZDM, 50(5), 863–879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0959-8
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, C. L., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L., & Shah, N. (2018). Equity analytics: A methodological approach for quantifying participation patterns in mathematics classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(2), 140–177. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.2.0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezat, S. (2013). The textbook-in-use: Students' utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing. ZDM, 45(5), 659–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0529-z
   Google Scholar
• Rezat, S., & Sträßer, R. (2012). From the didactical triangle to the socio-didactical tetrahedron: Artifacts as fundamental constituents of the didactical situation. ZDM, 44(5), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0448-4
   Google Scholar
• Sawada, D., Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science and Mathematics, 102(6), 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T. (2017). Injecting inquiry-oriented modules into calculus. PRIMUS, 27(7), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2016.1211205
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, M. (2020). The rationality of college mathematics instructors: The choice to use inquiry-oriented instruction [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2016). Calculus: Early transcendentals (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• TeachingWorks. (2019). High-leverage practices. http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices.
   Google Scholar
• Wawro, M., Rasmussen, C. L., Zandieh, M. J., Sweeney, G. F., & Larson, C. (2012). An inquiry-oriented approach to span and linear independence: The case of the magic carpet ride sequence. PRIMUS, 22(8), 577–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2012.667516
   Google Scholar
• Weir, R. J. (2020). Rethinking precalculus and calculus: A learner-centered approach. PRIMUS, 30(8-10), 995–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2019.1686669
   Google Scholar