A set theory analysis of the relationship between active learning and equitable and inclusive teaching

References

• Addy, T. M., Reeves, P. M., Dube, D., Mitchell, K. A., Reeves, P. M., & Mitchell, K. A. (2021). What really matters for instructors implementing equitable and inclusive teaching approaches. To Improve the Academy, 40(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.3998/tia.182
   Google Scholar
• Adiredja, A.P., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2017). Taking the sociopolitical turn in postsecondary mathematics education research. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(3), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-017-0054-5
   Google Scholar
• Apkarian, N., Henderson, C., Stains, M., Raker, J., & Johnson, E. (2021). What really impacts the use of active learning in undergraduate STEM education? Results from a national survey of chemistry, mathematics, and physics instructors. PLoS ONE, 16(2), e0247544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, C. D. (2018). Confronting the equity “learning problem” through practitioner inquiry. The Review of Higher Education, 41(3), 387–421. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claeys-Kulik, A. L., Jørgensen, T. E., & Stöber, H. (2019). Diversity, equity and inclusion in European higher education institutions. Results from the INVITED Project (pp. 1–51). European University Association Asil.
   Google Scholar
• Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (CBMS). (2016, July 15). Active learning in post-secondary mathematics education. https://www.cbmsweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/active_learning_statement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. M., Hendrix, T., Stephens, M. D., Cala, J. M., Mahrer, K., Krieg, A., Agloro, A. C. M., Badini, G. V., Barnes, M. E., Eledge, B., Jones, R., Lemon, E. C., Massimo, N. C., Martin, A., Ruberto, T., Simonson, K., Webb, E. A., Weaver, J., Zheng, Y., & Brownell, S. E. (2018). To be funny or not to be funny: Gender differences in student perceptions of instructor humor in college science courses. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0201258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dindyal, J., Schack, E. O., Choy, B. H., & Sherin, M. G. (2021). Exploring the terrains of mathematics teacher noticing. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. (2007). (Re)defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37–50). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., Valdés, G., & Gallimore, R. (2021). Teachers learning to implement equitable classroom talk. Educational Researcher, 50(8), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211014859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Keene, K., Melhuish, K., Keller, R., & Fortune, N. (2020). Inquiry and gender inequity in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. (2014). How colleges change: Understanding, leading, and enacting change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., & Gehrke, S. (2015). Communities of transformation and their work scaling STEM reform. Monograph from Pullias Center for Higher Education, Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California. https://pullias.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/communities-of-trans.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kress, N. E. (2021). Equitable mathematics instruction: Instructor and student perspectives [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I. Accessed March 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. (2019). Levers for change: An assessment of progress on changing STEM instruction. American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/2019-07/levers-for-change-WEB100_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M. L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: A multi-institution study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406–418. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S. L., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00085-6
   Google Scholar
• Lawrie, G., Marquis, E., Fuller, E., Newman, T., Qiu, M., Nomikoudis, M., Roelofs, F., & Van Dam, L. (2017). Moving towards inclusive learning and teaching: A synthesis of recent literature. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 5(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.5.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., Bailey, J. M., Bretones, P. S., Prather, E. E., Ballen, C. J., Knight, J. K., Smith, M. K., Stowe, R. L., Cooper, M. M., Prince, M., Atit, K., Uttal, D. H., LaDue, N. D., McNeal, P. M., Ryker, K., St. John, K., van der Hoeven Kraft, K. J., & Docktor, J. L. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620973974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzocchi, A. S., & Soto, R. C. (2023). From the front lines of active learning: Lessons learned from those who are trying. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 9(2), 524–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00176-x
   Google Scholar
• Mesa, V., Shultz, M., & Jackson, A. (2019). Moving away from lecture in undergraduate mathematics: Managing tensions within a coordinated inquiry-based linear algebra course. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, J. (2007). Faculty perceptions about barriers to active learning. College Teaching, 55(2), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.55.2.42-47
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, E. S., Shapiro, C., Toma, S., Sayson, H. W., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Johnson, T., & Sork, V. L. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms by engaging STEM faculty in culturally responsive teaching workshops. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(32), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ormand, C. J., Macdonald, R. H., Hodder, J., Bragg, D. D., Baer, E. M. D., & Eddy, P. (2022). Making departments diverse, equitable, and inclusive: Engaging colleagues in departmental transformation through discussion groups committed to action. Journal of Geoscience Education, 70(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2021.1989980
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, L. E., Howel, L. A., & Wischusen, W. (2016). Perceptions of active learning between faculty and undergraduates: Differing views among departments. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 17(3), 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D., Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Stone-Johnstone, A., Smith, J., Mullins, B., Fortune, N., Keene, K., & Shah, N. (2022). When active learning is inequitable: Women’s participation predicts gender inequities in mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(3), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L., & Apkarian, N. (2018). Four frames for systemic change in STEM departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0103-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinholz, D. L., Rasmussen, C., & Nardi, E. (2020). Time for (research on) change in mathematics departments. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00116-7
   Google Scholar
• Rios, J. (2022). Active learning in the language diverse undergraduate math classroom. In S. S. Karunakaran & A. Higgins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Boston, MA (pp. 454–462). SIGMAA for RUME.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, H. (2019). Inclusion in mathematics education: An ideology, a way of teaching, or both? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9854-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubel, L. H. (2017). Equity-directed instructional practices: Beyond the dominant perspective. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2), 66–105. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i2a324
   Google Scholar
• Sarju, J. P., & Jones, L. C. (2022). Improving the equity of undergraduate practical laboratory chemistry: Incorporating inclusive teaching and accessibility awareness into chemistry graduate teaching assistant training. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(1), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadle, S. E., Marker, A., & Earl, B. (2017). Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. M., Voigt, M., Ström, A., Webb, D., & Martin, W. G. (Eds.). (2021). Transformational change efforts: Student engagement in mathematics through an institutional network for active learning. American Mathematical Society and Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan, M. K., Esson, J. M., Knight, J. K., Laski, F. A., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C. J., Lo, S. M., McDonnell, L. M., McKay, T. A., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M. S., Plan, C. M., … Young, A. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science, 359(6383), 1468–1470. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones II, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuitt, F., Haynes, C., & Stewart, S. (2018). Transforming the classroom at traditionally white institutions to make Black Lives Matter. To Improve the Academy, 37(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20071
   Google Scholar
• White, K. N., Vincent-Layton, K., & Villarreal, B. (2021). Equitable and inclusive practices designed to reduce equity gaps in undergraduate chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(2), 330–339. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Apkarian, N., Uhing, K., Martinez, A. E., Rasmussen, C., & Smith, W. M. (2022). In the driver's seat: Course coordinators as change agents for active learning in university Precalculus to Calculus 2. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 8(1), 121–148.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., Uhing, K., Bennett, A., Voigt, M., Funk, R., Smith, W. M., & Donsig, A. (2022). Conceptualizations of active learning in departments engaged in instructional change efforts. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221131300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zazkis, R. (1995). Fuzzy thinking in non-fuzzy situations: Understanding students’ perspective. For the Learning of Mathematics, 15(3), 39–41.
   Google Scholar