Re-envisioning our journey of learning in mathematics

References

• Adendorff, A., & Blackie, M. (2020). Decolonising the science curriculum: When good intentions are not enough. In C. Winburg, K. Wilmot, & S. McKenna (Eds.), Building knowledge in higher education: Enhancing teaching and learning with LCT (pp. 237–254). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Angouri, J. (2021). Reimagining research-led education in a digital age. Insight Paper 3. The Guild of European Research-Intensive Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, M. H., & Moore, A. M. (2009). Mathematics anxiety and the affective drop in performance. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908330580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible utopia. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Blackie, M. A. L., & Adendorff, A. (2022). A decolonial science education: How we move forward? In M. Hlatswayo, H. Adendorff, M. A. L. Blackie, P. Maluleka, & A. Fataar (Eds.), Decolonising knowledge and knowers: Struggles for university transformation in South Africa (pp. 83–102). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Book 1: Cognitive domain. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bohlmann, C. A., Prince, R. N., & Deacon, A. (2017). Mathematical errors made by high performing candidate writing the national benchmark tests. Pythagorus – Journal of the Association for Mathematics Education in South Africa, 38(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v38i1.292
   Google Scholar
• Brink, C. (1999). Effective numeracy. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 54(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/00359199909520627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, C. (2018). The soul of a university: Why excellence is not enough. Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael, T., & Hadzikadic, M. (2019). The fundamentals of complex adaptive systems. In T. Carmichael, A. Collins, & M. Hadžikadić (Eds.), Complex adaptive systems. Understanding complex systems: Views from the physical, natural, and social sciences (pp. 1–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell-Holden, K. (2022). “Enlarging the space of the possible”: Re-conceptualising teaching excellent awards for the public good. In G. Young (Ed.), Academic development and its practitioners: A view from the inside (pp. 171–188). African Sun Media.
   Google Scholar
• Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council on Higher Education. (2013). A proposal for undergraduate curriculum reform in South Africa: The case for a flexible curriculum structure.
   Google Scholar
• Daker, R. J., Gattas, S. U., Sokolowski, H. M., Green, A. E., & Lyons, I. M. (2021). First-year students’ math anxiety predicts STEM avoidance and underperformance throughout university, independently of math ability. npj Science of Learning, 6(17), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00095-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, B., & Phelps, R. (2004). Complicity: An introduction and a welcome. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8711
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2003). Understanding learning systems: Mathematics education and complexity science. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2008). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deogratias, E. (2018). The possible ways of practising complexity theory through concept study in mathematics class. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 142–151.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, K. (2000). The math gene: How mathematical thinking evolved and why numbers are like gossip. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Dubinsky, E., & Lewin, P. (1986). Reflective abstraction and mathematics education: The genetic decomposition of induction and compactness. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 55–92. ISBN: 0732-3123.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(1-2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
   Google Scholar
• Ernest, P. (1999). Forms of knowledge in mathematics and mathematics education: Philosophical and rhetorical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38(1/3), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003577024357
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson, C. S., & Holling, L. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In C. S. Gunderson, & L. H. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformation in human and natural systems (pp. 25–62). Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, M. A., Shorter, S., Charkoudian, L. K., Heemstra, J. M., Le, B., & Corwin, L. A. (2021). Quantifying fear of failure in STEM: Modifying and evaluating the performance failure appraisal inventory (PFAI) for use with STEM undergraduates. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00300-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. (2006). Studying complex adaptive systems. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0001-z
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. (2000). The evaluation of educational innovation. Evaluation, 6(3), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890022209280
   Google Scholar
• Jorm, C., Nisbet, G., Roberts, C., Gordon, C., Gentilcore, S., & Chen, T. F. (2016). Using complexity theory to develop a student-directed interprofessional learning activity for 1220 healthcare students. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), Article 199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0717-y
   Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). The strands of mathematical proficiency. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (pp. 115–155). National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M. (2022). Exploring dynamic processes within the ecological university: A focus on the adaptive cycle. Oxford Review of Education, 48(5), 675–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.2007866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnear, G., Wood, A. K., & Gratwick, R. (2022). Designing and evaluating an online course to support transition to university mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1962554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, L. (2008). Complexity and Educational Research: A critical reflection. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00398.x
   Google Scholar
• Lonergan, B. (1992). Insight: A study of human understanding. Vol 3. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacBean, J. (2004). Students’ conceptions of, and approaches to, studying mathematics as a service subject at undergraduate level. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(4), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390410001714885
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1732-3_5
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2008). What is complexity theory and what are it implications for educational change? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00413.x
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2006, November). Complexity theory and education. Paper presented at the Asia-pacific educational research association, Hong Kong Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2010). Complexity theory, school leadership and management: Questions for theory and practice. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 38(3), 374–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209359711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1968). Piaget's point of view. International Journal of Psychology, 3(4), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207596808246651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quine, W. (1953). 1961, 1980, On what there is, in from a logical point of view. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, M. (2008). Prediction, control and the challenge to complexity. Oxford Review of Education, 34(5), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701772636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The mathematics anxiety rating scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G. (2019). May the fourth be with you: Creating education 4.0. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(2), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v6i2.352
   Google Scholar
• Scott, I., Yeld, N., & Hendry, J. (2007). A case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education. Higher Education Monitor No. 6. The Council on Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2004). Complexity theory and the mathematics lab-classroom. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 1(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8715
   Google Scholar
• South African University. (2018). Teaching and learning policy.
   Google Scholar
• South African University. (2021). Assessment policy.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. H. (1936). The theory of representations of Boolean algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 40(1), 37–111.
   Google Scholar
• Su, F. (2020). Mathematics for human flourishing. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom, S., & Allen, C. (2019). The adaptive cycle: More than a metaphor. Ecological Complexity, 39, Article 100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.100767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, L. N. (2000). Communicating mathematics across cultures and time. In H. Selin (Ed.), Mathematics across cultures: The history of non-western mathematics (pp. 1–12). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar