171
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Students’ self-regulated learning of university mathematics in different learning environments

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 02 May 2023, Published online: 06 Jun 2024

References

  • Anastasakis, M., Robinson, C. L., & Lerman, S. (2017). Links between students’ goals and their choice of educational resources in undergraduate mathematics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 36(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrx003
  • Artigue, M. (2021). Mathematics education research at university level. In V. Durand-Guerrier, R. Hochmuth, E. Nardi, & C. Winsløw (Eds.), Research and development in university mathematics education (1st ed., pp. 2–21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346859-3.
  • Biehler, R., Eichler, A., Hochmuth, R., Rach, S., & Schaper, N. (Eds.). (2021). Lehrinnovationen in der Hochschulmathematik: Praxisrelevant – didaktisch fundiert – forschungsbasiert. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62854-6.
  • Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 408–425). Routledge.
  • Credé, M., & Phillips, L. A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002
  • Di Martino, P., Gregorio, F., & Iannone, P. (2023). The transition from school to university mathematics in different contexts: Affective and sociocultural issues in students’ crisis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10179-9
  • Eichler, A., & Isaev, V. (2022). Improving prospective teachers’ beliefs about a double discontinuity between school mathematics and university mathematics. Journal Für Mathematik-Didaktik 44(1), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-022-00206-w
  • Ellsworth, P. C. (2013). Appraisal theory: Old and new questions. Emotion Review, 5(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912463617
  • Even, R. (2011). The relevance of advanced mathematics studies to expertise in secondary school mathematics teaching: Practitioners’ views. ZDM, 43(6–7), 941–950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0346-1
  • Geisler, S. (2023). What role do students’ beliefs play in a successful transition from school to university mathematics? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54, 1458–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2170291
  • Gildehaus, L., & Liebendörfer, M. (2021). “I don’t need this”—Understanding preservice teachers disaffection in mathematics. In M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri, & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 350–359). PME.
  • Göller, R. (2017). Students’ perceptions of and conclusions from their first assessment experience at university. In R. Göller, R. Biehler, R. Hochmuth, & H.-G. Rück (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics in higher education as a scientific discipline—conference proceedings (pp. 373–378). Universitätsbiliothek Kassel. https://kobra.bibliothek.uni-kassel.de/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:hebis:34-2016041950121/5/khdm_report_17_05.pdf.
  • Göller, R. (2020). Selbstreguliertes Lernen im Mathematikstudium. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28681-1
  • Göller, R. (2023). Conflicting mathematical worldviews: Even more challenges for mathematics preservice teachers. Prometeica - Revista de Filosofía y Ciencias, 27(27), 410–420. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.15326
  • Göller, R., & Gildehaus, L. (2021). Frustrated and helpless—Sources and consequences of students’ negative deactivating emotions in university mathematics. In M. Inprasitha, N. Changsri, & N. Boonsena (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 321–328). PME.
  • Göller, R., Lahdenperä, J., & Gildehaus, L. (2023). Getting through the exam: A case study of four Finnish and German students’ self-regulated learning of university mathematics. In M. Trigueros, B. Barquero, R. Hochmuth, & J. Peters (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth conference of the international network for didactic research in university mathematics (pp. 612–621). University of Hannover and INDRUM. https://hal.science/hal-04027870.
  • Göller, R., & Rück, H.-G. (2022). Emotions in self-regulated learning of first-year mathematics students. In R. Biehler, M. Liebendörfer, G. Gueudet, C. Rasmussen, & C. Winsløw (Eds.), Practice-oriented research in tertiary mathematics education (pp. 23–44). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14175-1_2.
  • Gueudet, G. (2008). Investigating the secondary–tertiary transition. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9100-6
  • Gueudet, G. (2023). New insights about the secondary–tertiary transition in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10223-2
  • Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2018). Didactic contract at the beginning of university: A focus on resources and their use. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-018-0069-6
  • Hailikari, T., Kordts-Freudinger, R., & Postareff, L. (2016). Feel the progress: Second-year students’ reflections on their first-year experience. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v5n3p79
  • Hoffmann, M. (2021). Einsatz von Schnittstellenaufgaben in Mathematikveranstaltungen – Praxisbeispiele aus der Universität Paderborn. In R. Biehler, A. Eichler, R. Hochmuth, S. Rach, & N. Schaper (Eds.), Lehrinnovationen in der Hochschulmathematik (pp. 179–204). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62854-6_9.
  • Kempen, L., & Liebendörfer, M. (2021). University students’ fully digital study of mathematics: An identification of student-groups via their resources usage and a characterization by personal and affective characteristics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, hrab020. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab020.
  • Kock, Z.-J., & Pepin, B. (2018). Student use of resources in Calculus and Linear Algebra. In V. Durand-Guerrier, R. Hochmuth, S. Goodchild, & N. M. Hogstad (Eds.), Proceedings of the second conference of the international network for didactic research in university mathematics (pp. 336–345). University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
  • Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative text analysis: A systematic approach. In G. Kaiser, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Compendium for early career researchers in mathematics education (pp. 181–197). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_8
  • Lahdenperä, J. (2022). Supporting quality of learning in university mathematics: Contrasting students’ approaches to learning, self-efficacy, and regulation of learning in two student-centred learning environments. University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-7873-2.
  • Lahdenperä, J., Rämö, J., & Postareff, L. (2021). Contrasting undergraduate mathematics students’ approaches to learning and their interactions within two student-centred learning environments. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54, 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1962998
  • Lahdenperä, J., Rämö, J., & Postareff, L. (2022). Student-centred learning environments supporting undergraduate mathematics students to apply regulated learning: A mixed-methods approach. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100949
  • Lawson, D., Grove, M., & Croft, T. (2020). The evolution of mathematics support: A literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8), 1224–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1662120
  • Liebendörfer, M. (2018). Motivationsentwicklung im Mathematikstudium. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22507-0
  • Liebendörfer, M., & Hochmuth, R. (2015). Perceived autonomy in the first semester of mathematics studies. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp. 2180–2186). Charles University in Prague.
  • Liebendörfer, M., Kempen, L., & Schukajlow, S. (2023). First-year university students’ self-regulated learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative longitudinal study. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01444-5
  • Liebendörfer, M., & Schukajlow, S. (2020). Quality matters: How reflecting on the utility value of mathematics affects future teachers’ interest. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09982-z
  • Martínez-Sierra, G., & García-González, M. d. S. (2016). Undergraduate mathematics students’ emotional experiences in Linear Algebra courses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9634-y
  • Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273731
  • Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165
  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
  • Rach, S. (2022). Aufgaben zur Verknüpfung von Schul- und Hochschulmathematik: Haben derartige Aufgaben Auswirkungen auf das Interesse von Lehramtsstudierenden? In V. Isaev, A. Eichler, & F. Loose (Eds.), Professionsorientierte Fachwissenschaft (pp. 177–189). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63948-1_10.
  • Rach, S., & Schukajlow, S. (2023). Affecting task values, costs, and effort in university mathematics courses: The role of profession-related tasks on motivational and behavioral states. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10413-7
  • Radmer, F., & Goodchild, S. (2021). Online mathematics teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: The perspective of lecturers and students. Nordic Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.5324/njsteme.v5i1.3914
  • Rämö, J., Lahdenperä, J., & Häsä, J. (2021). The extreme apprenticeship method. PRIMUS, 31(10), 1106–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2020.1818332
  • Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research, 92(120), 57.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition & Emotion, 23(7), 1307–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902928969
  • Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 143(6), 565–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
  • Sierpinska, A., Bobos, G., & Knipping, C. (2008). Sources of students’ frustration in pre-university level, prerequisite mathematics courses. Instructional Science, 36(4), 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9033-6
  • Solomon, Y., & Croft, T. (2016). Understanding undergraduate disengagement from mathematics: Addressing alienation. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.10.006
  • Tekoppele, J. L., De Hooge, I. E., & van Trijp, H. C. M. (2023). We’ve got a situation here! – How situation-perception dimensions and appraisal dimensions of emotion overlap. Personality and Individual Differences, 200, 111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111878
  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Klymchuk, S. (2012). The school–tertiary interface in mathematics: Teaching style and assessment practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0051-6
  • Wasserman, N., Buchbinder, O., & Buchholtz, N. (2023). Making university mathematics matter for secondary teacher preparation. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 55(4), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01484-5
  • Wasserman, N., Weber, K., Villanueva, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ views about the limited utility of real analysis: A transport model hypothesis. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 50, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.01.004
  • Weber, B.-J., Breuer, J., & Lindmeier, A. (2023). How do school-related mathematical problems become relevant for prospective teachers in mathematics courses at university? A qualitative interview study. Research in Mathematics Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2023.2243261
  • Winsløw, C., & Rasmussen, C. (2020). University mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 881–890). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100020.
  • Zazkis, R., & Leikin, R. (2010). Advanced mathematical knowledge in teaching practice: Perceptions of secondary mathematics teachers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(4), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986061003786349
  • Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2015). A personal agency view of self-regulated learning. In F. Guay, H. Marsh, D. M. McInerney, & R. G. Craven (Eds.), Self-Concept, motivation and identity: Underpinning success with research and practice (pp. 83–114).