Validity of the 36-item Persian (Farsi) version of the world health organization disability assessment schedule (WHODAS) 2.0

References

• Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi, M., Razi, E., Sehat, M., & Asadi-Lari, M. (2015). Measurement of disability and its predictors among trauma patients: A follow-up study. Archives of Trauma Research, 4(3), e29393. doi:10.5812/atr.29393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi, M., Razi, E., Sehat, M., & Asadi-Lari, M. (2016). Psychometric properties of the world health organization disability assessment schedule II -12 Item (WHODAS II) in trauma patients. Injury, 47(5), 1104–1108. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi, M., Razi, E., Sehat, M., & Asadi-Lari, M. (2017). Return to work after trauma: A survival analysis. Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 20(2), 67–74. doi:10.1016/j.cjtee.2016.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedzadeh–Kalahroudi, M., Razi, E., & Sehat, M. (2015). Assessment of disability with WHODAS II–12 Item in trauma patients. Trauma Monthly (Special Issue), 20, e28529. doi:10.5812/traumamon.28529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adib-Hajbaghery, M. (2011). Evaluation of old-age disability and related factors among an Iranian elderly population. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 17(9), 671–678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adib-Hajbaghery, M., & Aghahoseini, S. (2007). The evaluation of disability and its related factors among the elderly population in Kashan, Iran. BMC Public Health, 7, 261. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), Second International Symposium of Information Theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest, HU: Akademiai Kiado.
   Google Scholar
• Akinsulore, A., Mapayi, B., Aloba, O., Oloniniyi, I., Fatoye, F., & Makanjuola, R. (2015). Disability assessment as an outcome measure: A comparative study of Nigerian outpatients with schizophrenia and healthy control. Annals of General Psychiatry, 14(1), 40. doi:10.1186/s12991-015-0079-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso, J., Petukhova, M., Vilagut, G., Chatterji, S., Heeringa, S., Üstün, T. B., … Kessler, R. C. (2011). Days out of role due to common physical and mental conditions: Results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(12), 1234–1246. doi:10.1038/mp.2010.101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich, D. (1978). A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika, 43(4), 561–573. doi:10.1007/BF02293814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APA (American Psychiatric Association). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolucci, F., Bacci, S., & Gnaldi, M. (2015). Statistical analysis of questionnaires: A unified approach based on R and stata. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the United Nation’s convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Data and the international classification of functioning, disability and health. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl 4), S8. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-S4-S8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach, J. E. (2012). The international classification of functioning, disability and health and its relationship to disability studies. In N. Watson, A. Roulstone & C. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 51–66). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 395–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Buist-Bouwman, M. A., Ormel, J., De Graaf, R., Vilagut, G., Alonso, J., Van Sonderen, E., Vollebergh, W. A. M. … MHEDEA 2000 Investigators. (2008). Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule used in the European Study of the epidemiology of mental disorders. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 17(4), 185–197. doi:10.1002/mpr.261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, T.-Y., Yen, C.-F., Chou, C.-H., Lin, J.-D., Hwang, A.-W., Liao, H.-F., & Chi, W.-C. (2014). Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36 - item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: Validity and reliability analyses. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(11), 2812–2820. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, P. K., Couper, J. W., & Herrman, H. (2004). The assessment of patients with long-term psychotic disorders: Application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38(9), 753–759. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01448.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, S., Bracalenti, M., Meloni, F., & Luciano, J. V. (2017). World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0: An international systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(23), 2347–2380. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici, S., Meloni, F., Mancini, A., Lauriola, M., & Olivetti Belardinelli, M. (2009). World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II: Contribution to the Italian validation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 31(7), 553–564. doi:10.1080/09638280802240498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J. B. W. (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM–IV axis I disorders SCID–I: Clinician version, administration booklet. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. H. (1995). Derivations of the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 15–38). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Garin, O., Ayuso-Mateos, J., Almansa, J., Nieto, M., Chatterji, S., Vilagut, G., … Ferrer, M. (2010a). Validation of the “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(5), 1–15. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garin, O., Ayuso-Mateos, J., Almansa, J., Nieto, M., Chatterji, S., Vilagut, G., … MHADIE Consortium. (2010b). Research Validation of the “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8(1), 51. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-8-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasser, W. (2010). Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Pino, Ó., Rojo, E., Vieta, E., Cuesta, M. J., … Rejas, J. (2015). Disability in bipolar I disorder: The 36–item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 353–360. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.12.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J., Pino, O., Rojo, J. E., Cuesta, M. J., Martínez-Arán, A., … Rejas, J. (2012). Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 138(2-3), 240–247. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston, MA: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, R. C., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Alonso, J., Chatterji, S., Lee, S., & Üstün, T. B. (2009). The WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Psychiatrie (Stuttgart, Germany), 6(1), 5–9. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1671923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luciano, J. V., Ayuso-Mateos, J., Aguado, J., Fernandez, A., Serrano-Blanco, A., Roca, M., & Haro, J. (2010). The 12–item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): A nonparametric item response analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(45), 1–9. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-10-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47(2), 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, F., Aminian, M. R., & Heidarzadeh, A. (2017). Study of age at Onset and Causes of Disability of Elderly People in Hospice (Nursing home) of Disabled and Elderly People of Rasht. [. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, 26(101), 46–57.
   Google Scholar
• Migone, P. (2013). Presentazione del DSM-5. Psicoterapia E Scienze Umane, 47(4), 567–600. doi:10.3280/PU2013-004001.
   Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1992). A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithm. Applied Psychological Measurement, 16(2), 159–176. doi:10.1177/014662169201600206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagi, S. Z. (1964). A study in the evaluation of disability and rehabilitation potential: Concepts, methods, and procedures. American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 54(9), 1568–1579. doi:10.2105/AJPH.54.9.1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagi, S. Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In M. B. Sussman (Ed.), Sociology and rehabilitation (pp. 100–113). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pösl, M., Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2007). Psychometric properties of the WHODASII in rehabilitation patients. Quality of Life Research, 16(9), 1521–1531. doi:10.1007/s11136-007-9259-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeziesfahani, S., Fata, L., Hassanabadi, H. R., Yaghuobi, H., Zahiroddin, A., Sadr, S., … Noorbakhsh, S. (2016). Meta-cognitive therapy in drug-resistant patients with obsessive - compulsive disorder: Case report. [ ]. The Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 5(2), 40–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjbar, M., & Sotudeh, H. (2010). Anthropology with emphasis on Iranian people’s culture. Tehran, IR: Neday-e-Aryana Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1967). An informal report on a theory of objectivity in comparisons. In L. J. T. van der Kamp & C. A. J. Vlek (Eds.), Psychological measurement theory. Proceedings of the NUFFIC international summer session in science at Het Oude Hof (pp. 1–19). Leyden, NL: University of Leyden.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1976). May 14–16). On Specific Objectivity. An Attempt at Formalizing the Request for Generality and Validity of Scientific Statements. Symposium on Scientific Objectivity, Vedbaek, DK.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, G. (1993). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen, DK: Danish Institute for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Salarzaei, M., Malekzadegan, A., Havasian, M. R., Zaare, M. A., Behnampoor, M., & Mahmoodi, Z. (2017). Assessing the prevalence of disability and its relationship with demographic characteristics of the elderly in Zahedan city in Iran. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 8(9), 3971–3977. doi:10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(9).3971-77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltychev, M., Mattie, R., McCormick, Z., & Laimi, K. (2017). Confirmatory factor analysis of 12–item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in patients with musculoskeletal pain conditions. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31(5), 702–709. doi:10.1177/0269215516652930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavolin, S., Ferroli, P., Acerbi, F., Brock, S., Broggi, M., Cusin, A., … Raggi, A. (2014). Disability in Italian neurosurgical patients: Validity of the 12–item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 37(3), 267–270. doi:10.1097/MRR.0000000000000064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. doi:10.2307/2958889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, M. R., Foroughan, M., Rahgozar, M., & Roghani, R. S. (2016a). Effects of adult day care services on disability in older persons: Evaluation of a designed service package in Iran. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(8), 719–724. doi:10.2340/16501977-2115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, M. R., Foroughan, M., Rahgozar, M., & Salmanroghani, R. (2016b). The relations between disability and environmental factors: A pilot study in Iranian older adults. Global Journal of Health Science, 8(12), 87. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v8n12p87.
   Google Scholar
• Shahbazi, M. R., Foroughan, M., Roghani, R. S., & Rahgozar, M. (2016c). The relationship between disability and variables of depression, cognitive status, and morale among older people. Iranian Journal of Ageing, 11(4), 132–141. doi:10.21859/sija-1101132.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifi, V., Amin-Esmaeili, M., Hajebi, A., Motevalian, A., Radgoodarzi, R., Hefazi, M., & Rahimi-Movaghar, A. (2015). Twelve-month prevalence and correlates of psychiatric disorders in Iran: The Iranian Mental Health Survey, 2011. Archives of Iranian Medicine, 18(2), 76–84. doi:015182/aim.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1989). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–III–R Personality Disorders (SCID–II). New York, NY: New York State Psychiatric Dept.
   Google Scholar
• Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Kostanjsek, N., Rehm, J., Kennedy, C., Epping-Jordan, J., … Pull, C. (2010). Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(11), 815–823. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.067231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstün, T. B., Kostanjsek, N., Chatterji, S., & Rehm, J. (2010). Measuring health and disability: Manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Geneva, CH: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). (1988). WHO Psychiatric Disability Assessment Schedule (WHO/DAS): With a guide to its use. Geneva, CH: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). (2001). ICF: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, CH: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). (2004). WHODAS-II – Disability Assessment Schedule Training Manual: A guide to administration. Geneva, CH: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., Erikson, P., … ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. P., Liu, Y., Li, H. L., Ma, L., Zhang, Y. J., & Wang, J. (2013). Activity limitation and participation restrictions of breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: Psychometric properties and validation of the Chinese version of the WHODAS 2.0. Quality of Life Research, 22(4), 897–906. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0212-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar