Prioritizing quality characteristics in dynamic quality function deployment

References

• Ames , AE , Mattucci , N , Macdonald , S , Szonyi , G and Hawkins , DM . 1997 . Quality loss functions for optimization across multiple response surfaces . J. Qual. Tech. , 29 ( 3 ) : 339 – 346 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armacost , RL , Componation , PJ , Mullens , MA and Swart , WW . 1994 . An AHP framework for prioritizing customer requirements in QFD: an industrialised housing application . IIE Trans. , 26 ( 4 ) : 72 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askin , RG and Dawson , DW . 2000 . Maximising customer satisfaction by optimal specification of engineering characteristics . IIE Trans. , 32 : 9 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai , H and Kwong , CK . 2003 . Inexact genetic algorithm approach to target values setting of engineering requirements in QFD . Int. J. Prod. Res. , 41 ( 16 ) : 3861 – 3881 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode , J and Fung , RYK . 1998 . Cost engineering with quality function deployment . Comp. & Indust. Eng. , 35 ( 3/4 ) : 587 – 590 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchereau , V and Rowlands , H . 2000 . Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD) . Benchmarking: An Int. J. , 7 ( 1 ) : 8 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Bovea , MD and Wang , B . 2003 . Identifying environmental improvement options by combining life cycle assessment and fuzzy set theory . Int. J. Prod. Res. , 41 ( 3 ) : 593 – 609 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brombacher , AC , Sander , PC , Sonnemans , PJM and Rouvroye , JL . 2005 . Managing product reliability in business processes ‘under pressure’ . Reliab. Eng. & Syst. Safety , 88 : 137 – 146 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , LH and Weng , MC . 2006 . An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models . Euro. J. Op. Res. , 172 : 230 – 248 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen , Y , Tang , J , Fung , RYK and Ren , Z . 2004 . Fuzzy regression-based mathematical programming model for quality function deployment . Int. J. Prod. Res. , 42 ( 5 ) : 1009 – 1027 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen , L . 1995 . Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for you , MA : Addison-Wesley Publishing Company .
   Google Scholar
• Erol , I and Ferrell , WG Jr . 2003 . A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria . Int. J. Prod. Econ. , 86 : 187 – 199 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung , RYK , Tang , J , Tu , PY and Chen , Y . 2003 . Modelling a quality function deployment planning with resource allocation . Res. Eng. Des. , 14 : 247 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han , CH , Kim , JK and Choi , SH . 2004 . Prioritizing engineering characteristics in quality function deployment with incomplete information: a linear partial ordering approach . Int. J. Prod. Econ. , 91 : 235 – 249 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han , SB , Chen , SK , Ebrahimpour , M and Sodhi , MS . 2001 . A conceptual QFD planning model . Int. J. Qual. & Reliab. Manage. , 18 ( 8/9 ) : 796 – 812 .
   Google Scholar
• Hauser , JR and Clausing , D . 1988 . The house of quality . Harv. Bus. Rev. , 66 ( 3 ) : 63 – 73 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman , C , Ertay , T and Buyukozkan , G . 2006 . A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach . Euro. J. Op. Res. , 171 : 390 – 411 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak , EE . 2004 . Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment . Int. J. Prod. Res. , 42 ( 18 ) : 3957 – 3974 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak , EE , Sozer , S and Alptekin , SE . 2002 . Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach . Comp. & Indust. Eng. , 44 : 171 – 190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , YJ and Cho , BR . 2002 . Development of priority-based robust design . Qual. Eng. , 14 ( 3 ) : 355 – 363 .
   Google Scholar
• Kim , KJ , Cho , HW , Jeong , IJ and Lim , IG . 2003 . A synopsis of recent methodological enhancements on quality function deployment . Int. J. Indust. Eng. , 10 ( 4 ) : 462 – 466 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong , CK and Bai , H . 2002 . A fuzzy AHP approach to the determination of importance weights of customer requirements in quality function deployment . J. Intel. Manuf. , 13 : 367 – 377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong , CK and Bai , H . 2003 . Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach . IIE Trans. , 35 : 619 – 626 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai , X , Xie , M and Tan , KC . 2005 . Dynamic programming for QFD optimization . Qual. & Reliab. Eng. Int. , 21 : 769 – 780 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , ST . 2005 . Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach . Int. J. Prod. Res. , 43 ( 3 ) : 497 – 513 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu , M , Madu , CN , Kuei , C and Winokur , D . 1994 . Integrating QFD, AHP, and benchmarking in strategic marketing . J. Bus. & Indust. Mark. , 9 ( 1 ) : 41 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Myint , S . 2003 . A framework of an intelligent quality function deployment (IQFD) for discrete assembly environment . Comp. & Indust. Eng. , 45 : 269 – 283 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park , T and Kim , KJ . 1998 . Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality . J. Op. Manage. , 16 : 569 – 581 .
   Google Scholar
• Reich , Y and Levy , E . 2004 . Managing product design quality under resource constraints . Int. J. Prod. Res. , 42 ( 13 ) : 2555 – 2572 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReVelle , JB , Moran , JW and Cox , CA . 1997 . The QFD Handbook , New York, NY : John Wiley & Sons, Inc. .
   Google Scholar
• Shillito , ML . 1994 . Advanced QFD: Linking Technology to Market and Company Needs , New York, NY : John Wiley & Sons, Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Shipley , MF , Korvin , A and Yoon , JM . 2004 . Fuzzy quality function deployment: determining the distributions of effort dedicated to technical change . Int. Trans. Op. Res. , 11 : 293 – 307 .
   Google Scholar
• Shen , XX , Xie , M and Tan , KC . 2001 . Listening to the future voice of the customer using fuzzy trend analysis in QFD . Qual. Eng. , 13 ( 3 ) : 419 – 425 .
   Google Scholar
• Tang , LC and Paoli , P . 2004 . A spreadsheet-based multiple criteria optimization framework for quality function deployment . Int. J. Qual. & Reliab. Manage. , 21 ( 3 ) : 329 – 347 .
   Google Scholar
• Tang , LC and Xu , K . 2002 . A unified approach for dual response surface optimization . J. Qual. Tech. , 34 ( 4 ) : 437 – 447 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanegas , LV and Labib , AW . 2001 . A fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets . Int. J. Prod. Res. , 39 ( 1 ) : 99 – 120 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , H , Xie , M and Goh , TN . 1998 . A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment . Total Qual. Manage. , 9 ( 6 ) : 421 – 430 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman , GS . 1993 . On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process . IIE Trans. , 25 ( 3 ) : 59 – 65 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu , HH , Liao , AYH and Wang , PC . 2005 . Using grey theory in quality function deployment to analyse dynamic customer requirements . Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. , 25 : 1241 – 1247 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie , M , Tan , KC and Goh , TN . 2003 . Advanced QFD Applications , Milwaukee, WI : ASQ Quality Press .
   Google Scholar