Timed event graph-based cyclic reconfigurable flow shop modelling and optimization

References

• Abdi, MR, and Labib, AW, 2003. A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): a case study, Int. J. Prod. Res. 41 (2003), pp. 2273–2299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi, MR, and Labib, AW, 2004a. Grouping and selecting products: the design key of reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs), Int. J. Prod. Res. 42 (2004a), pp. 521–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi, MR, and Labib, AW, 2004b. Feasibility study of the tactical design justification for reconfigurable manufacturing systems using the fuzzy analytical hierarchical process, Int. J. Prod. Res. 42 (2004b), pp. 3055–3076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruccoleri, M, Amico, M, and Perrone, G, 2003. Distributed intelligent control of exceptions in reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Int. J. Prod. Res. 41 (2003), pp. 1393–1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, J, Chiola, G, Colom, JM, and Silva, M, 1992. Properties and performance bounds for timed marked graphs, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Fund. Theory Applic. 39 (1992), pp. 386–401.
   Google Scholar
• Cochet-Terrasson, J, Cohen, G, Gaubert, S, Gettrick, MM, and Quadrat, J-P, 1998. "Numerical computation of spectral elements in max-plus algebra". In: Proceedings of the IFAC Conference on System Structure and Control. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Commoner, F, Holt, AW, Even, S, and Pnueli, A, 1971. Marked directed graphs, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 5 (1971), pp. 511–523.
   Google Scholar
• Crama, Y, and van de Klundert, J, 1997. Cyclic scheduling of identical parts in a robotic cell, Oper. Res. 45 (1997), pp. 952–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Framinan, JM, Gupta, JND, and Leisten, R, 2004. A review and classification of heuristics for permutation flow-shop scheduling with makespan objective, J. oper. Res. Soc. 55 (2004), pp. 1243–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garey, MR, Johnson, DS, and Sethi, R, 1976. The complexity of flowshop and jobshop scheduling, Math. Oper. Res. 1 (1976), pp. 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Hillion, H, and Proth, J-M, 1989. Performance evaluation of job-shop systems using timed event-graphs, IEEE Trans. autom. Control 34 (1989), pp. 3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamoun, H, and Sriskandarajah, C, 1993. The complexity of scheduling jobs in repetitive manufacturing systems, Eur. J. oper. Res. 70 (1993), pp. 350–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, RM, 1978. A characterization of the minimum cycle mean in a digraph, Discr. Math. 23 (1978), pp. 309–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren, Y, Heisel, U, Jovane, F, Moriwaki, T, Pritschow, G, Ulsoy, G, and Van Brussel, H, 1999. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Ann. CIRP 48 (1999), pp. 527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers, RG, Min, BK, and Koren, Y, 2001. Reconfigurable machine tools, Ann. CIRP 50 (2001), pp. 269–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magott, J, 1984. Performance evaluation of concurrent systems using Petri nets, Inf. Process. Lett. 18 (1984), pp. 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murata, T, 1989. Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications, Proc. IEEE 77 (1989), pp. 541–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E, Tilbury, DM, and Khargonekar, PP, 1999. Modular logic controllers for machining systems: formal representation and performance analysis using Petri nets, IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom. 15 (1999), pp. 1046–1061.
   Google Scholar
• Park, E, Tilbury, DM, and Khargonekar, PP, 2001. A modelling and analysis methodology for modular logic controllers of machining systems using Petri net formalism, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet.—Part C: Applic. Rev. 31 (2001), pp. 168–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy, CV, and Ho, GS, 1980. Performance evaluation of asynchronous concurrent systems using Petri nets, IEEE Trans. Softw. Engng 6 (1980), pp. 440–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, GG, and Bottaci, L, 1997. Modular production systems: a new manufacturing paradigm, J. intell. Mfg 8 (1997), pp. 147–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada, T, and Kataoka, S, 1994. On some LP problems for performance evaluation of timed marked graphs, IEEE Trans. autom. Control 39 (1994), pp. 696–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigit, AS, Ulsoy, AG, and Allahverdi, A, 2002. Optimizing modular product design for reconfigurable manufacturing, J. intell. Mfg 13 (2002), pp. 309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigit, AS, and Allahverdi, A, 2003. Optimal selection of module instances for modular products in reconfigurable manufacturing systems, Int. J. Prod. Res. 41 (2003), pp. 4063–4074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, XB, Wang, JC, and Luo, ZB, 2000a. A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system—Part 1: A framework, Int. J. Prod. Res. 38 (2000a), pp. 2273–2285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, XB, Wang, JC, and Luo, ZB, 2000b. A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system—Part 2: Optimal configurations, Int. J. Prod. Res. 38 (2000b), pp. 2829–2842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, XB, Wang, JC, and Luo, ZB, 2001a. A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system—Part 3: Optimal selection policy, Int. J. Prod. Res. 39 (2001a), pp. 747–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, XB, Wang, JC, and Luo, ZB, 2001b. A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system—Part 4: Performance measure, Int. J. Prod. Res. 39 (2001b), pp. 1113–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar