Monitoring the ratio of two normal variables using Run Rules type control charts

References

• Acosta-Mejia, C. A. 2007. “Two Sets of Runs Rules for the ‾X Chart.” Quality Engineering 19 (2): 129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Antzoulakos, D. L., and A. C. Rakitzis. 2008. “The Modified r out of m Control Chart.” Communications in Statistics -- Simulation and Computation 37 (2): 396–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersimis, S., S. Psarakis, and J. Panaretos. 2006. “Multivariate Statistical Process Control Charts: An Overview.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 23 (5): 517–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bissell, A. F. 1978. “An Attempt to Unify the Theory of Quality Control Procedures.” Bulletin in Applied Statistics 5 (2): 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, M. E., and S. M. Scariano. 2013. “A Synthetic Control Chart for the Coefficient of Variation.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 83 (5): 853–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., A. Achouri, H. Taleb, G. Celano, and S. Psarakis. 2013. “Monitoring the Coefficient of Variation Using Control Charts with Run Rules.” Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 10 (1): 75–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagliola, P., G. Celano, and S. Psarakis. 2011. “Monitoring the Coefficient of Variation Using EWMA Charts.” Journal of Quality Technology 43 (3): 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celano, G., and P. Castagliola. 2015. “Design of a Phase II Control Chart for Monitoring the Ratio of Two Normal Variables.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, in press. doi:10.1002/qre.1748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celano, G., P. Castagliola, A. Faraz, and S. Fichera. 2014. “Statistical Performance of a Control Chart for Individual Observations Monitoring the Ratio of Two Normal Variables.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 30 (8): 1361–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celano, G., P. Castagliola, G. Nenes, and S. Fichera. 2013. “Performance of t Control Charts in Short Runs with Unknown Shift Sizes.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 64: 56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ, C. W., and L. A. Jones-Farmer. 2005. “Properties of the T2 Control Chart When Parameters are Estimated.” Technometrics 47: 437–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ, C. W., and W. H. Woodall. 1987. “Exact Results for the Shewhart Control Chart with Supplementary Runs Rules.” Technometrics 29: 393–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ, C. W., and W. H. Woodall. 1997. “Signal Probabilities of Runs Rules Supplementing a Shewhart Control Chart.” Communications in Statistics -- Simulation and Computation 26 (4): 1347–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. K., and K. L. Hsieh. 2007. “Hotellings T2 Charts with Variable Sample Size and Control Limit.” European Journal of Operational Research 182: 1251–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, M. K., and D. C. Montgomery. 1992. “Investigation and Characterization of a Control Scheme for Multivariate Quality Control.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 8: 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. B. 1994. “X Charts with Variable Sample Size.” Journal of Quality Technology 26 (3): 155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. B. 1997. “‾X Chart with Variable Sample Size and Sampling Intervals.” Journal of Quality Technology 29 (2): 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. B. 1999. “X Charts with Variable Parameters.” Journal of Quality Technology 31 (4): 408–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. B., and W. H. Woodall. 1991. “Evaluation of Control Charts for Ratios.” In 22nd Annual Pittsburgh Conference on Modeling and Simulation, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Divoky, J. J., and R. W. Taylor. 1995. “Detecting Process Drift with Combinations of Trend and Zonal Supplementary Runs Rules.” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 12 (2): 60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Frisen, M. 2011. “On Multivariate Control Charts.” Produção 21 (2): 235–241.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J. C., G. Shmueli, A. Cohen, and Y. M. Chang. 2003. “A Unified Markov Chain Approach for Computing the Run Length Distribution in Control Charts with Simple or Compound Rules.” Statistics & Probability letters 65 (4): 457–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geary, R. C. 1930. “The Frequency Distribution of the Quotient of Two Normal Variates.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 93 (3): 442–446.
   Google Scholar
• Hayya, J., D. Armstrong, and N. Gressis. 1975. “A Note on the Ratio of Two Normally Distributed Variables.” Management Science 21 (11): 1338–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. 1947. Multivariate Quality Control -- Illustrated by the Air Testing of Sample Bombsights. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, W. A., G. R. Bryce, and M. R. Reynolds Jr. 2008. “Design Issues for Adaptive Control Charts.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 24 (4): 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, C. W., M. S. Lee, Y. J. Seong, and D. M. Hawkins. 2007. “A Control Chart for the Coefficient of Variation.” Journal of Quality Technology 39 (2): 151–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, M. B. C. 2004. “Design of Runs Rules Schemes.” Quality Engineering 16 (2): 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. 2000. “Two Alternatives to the Shewhart ‾X Control Chart.” Journal of Quality Technology 32: 427–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latouche, G., and V. Ramaswami. 1999. Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modelling. ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry, C. A., C. W. Champ, and W. H. Woodall. 1995. “The Performance of Control Charts for Monitoring Process Variation.” Communications in Statistics -- Simulation and Computation 24 (2): 409–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, C. A., and D. C. Montgomery. 1995. “A Review of Multivariate Control Charts.” IIE Transactions 27 (6): 800–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, C. A., W. H. Woodall, C. W. Champ, and S. E. Rigdon. 1992. “A Multivariate Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Chart.” Technometrics 34 (1): 46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. L., C. W. Champ, N. D. Tracy, S. J. Wierda, and J. C. Young. 1997. “Assessment of Multivariate Process Control Techniques.” Journal of Quality Technology 29 (2): 140–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. L., Y. M. Chou, and J. C. Young. 2001. “Applying Hotelling’s T2 Statistic to Batch Processes.” Journal of Quality Technology 34 (3): 466–479.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, R. L., and J. C. Young. 1999. “Improving the Sensitivity of the T2 Statistic in Multivariate Process Control.” Journal of Quality Technology 31 (2): 155–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R. L., and J. C. Young. 2002. Multivariate Statistical Process Control with Industrial Applications. Philadelphia, PA: ASA-SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2009. Statistical Quality Control: A Modern Introduction. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Neuts, M. F. 1981. Matrix Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models: An Algorithmic Approach. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Öksoy, D., E. Boulos, and L. D. Pye. 1994. “Statistical Process Control by the Quotient of Two Correlated Normal Variables.” Quality Engineering 6 (2): 179–194.
   Google Scholar
• Page, E. S. 1955. “Control Charts with Warning Lines.” Biometrics 42 (1--2): 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm, A. 1990. “Tables of Run Length Percentiles for Determining the Sensitivity of Shewhart Control Charts for Averages with Supplementary Runs Rules.” Journal of Quality Technology 22 (4): 289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz, M., R. Mehmood, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2011. “On the Performance of Different Control Charting Rules.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 27 (8): 1059–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. 1958. “Properties of Control Chart Zone Tests.” The Bell System Technical Journal 37: 83–114.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu, J. H., H. Wan, and S. Kim. 2010. “Optimal Design of a CUSUM Chart for a Mean Shift of Unknown Size.” Journal of Quality Technology 42 (3): 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shmueli, G., and A. Cohen. 2003. “Run Length Distribution for Control Charts with Runs and Scans Rules.” Communications in Statistics -- Theory and Methods 32 (2): 475–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spisak, A. W. 1990. “A Control Chart for Ratios.” Journal of Quality Technology 22 (1): 34–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trip, A., and R. J. M. M. Does. 2010. “Quality Quandaries: Interpretation of Signals from Runs Rules in Shewhart Control Charts.” Quality Engineering 22 (4): 351–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Western-Electric. 1956. Statistical Quality Control Handbook. Indianapolis, IN: Western Electric Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, J. 1983. “Detecting a Shift in Process Average: Tables of the Power Function for ‾X Charts.” Journal of Quality Technology 15: 155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodall, W. H., and D. C. Montgomery. 1999. “Research Issues and Ideas in Statistical Process Control.” Journal of Quality Technology 31: 376–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasui, S., Y. Ojima, T. Suzuki, H.-J. Lenz, and P.-T. Wilrich, eds. 2006. Generalization of the Run Rules for the Shewhart Control Charts Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 8. 207–219, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. B., D. J. K. Lin, and R. N. McGrath. 2006. “Multivariate Control Charts for Monitoring Covariance Matrix: A Review.” Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 3 (4): 415–436.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and P. Castagliola. 2010. “Run Rules ‾X Charts When Process Parameters are Unknown.” International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 17 (4): 381–399.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Z. Li, B. Chen, and Z. Wang. 2014. “A New Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Control Chart for Monitoring the Coefficient of Variation.” Computers and Industrial Engineering 78: 205–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar