A quick switching sampling system by variables for controlling lot fraction nonconforming

References

• Aslam, M., C. W. Wu, M. Azam, and C. H. Jun. 2013. “Variable Sampling Inspection for Resubmitted Lots Based on Process Capability Index Cpk for Normally Distributed Items.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 37 (3): 667–675.10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C. H. Jun. 2007. “Multiple Dependent State Sampling Plans for Lot Acceptance Based on Measurement Data.” European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3): 1221–1230.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and C. H. Jun. 2009. “Designing of a Variables Two-plan System by Minimizing the Average Sample Number.” Journal of Applied Statistics 36 (10): 1159–1172.10.1080/02664760802562514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., H. Park, C. H. Jun, K. J. Kim, and J. Lee. 2005. “Designing of Variables Repetitive Group Sampling Plan Involving Minimum Average Sample Number.” Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 34: 799–809.10.1081/SAC-200068424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and M. Usha. 2012. “Variables Quick Switching System with Double Specification Limits.” International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 19 (2): 125008-1–125008-17.
   Google Scholar
• Balamurali, S., and M. Usha. 2014. “Optimal Designing of Variables Quick Switching System Based on the Process Capability Index Cpk.” Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering 31 (2): 85–94.10.1080/21681015.2014.893929
   Google Scholar
• Boyles, R. A. 1994. “Process Capability with Asymmetric Tolerances.” Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 23 (3): 615–635.10.1080/03610919408813190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharmasena, L. S., and P. Zeephongsekul. 2014. “Univariate and Multivariate Process Yield Indices Based on Location-scale Family of Distributions.” International Journal of Production Research 52 (11): 3348–3365.10.1080/00207543.2013.874604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, H. F. 1965. “Evaluation of a Sampling System Having Rules for Switching Between Normal and Tightened Inspection.” Technical Report No. 14. Piscataway, NJ: Statistics Center, Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H. F. 1967. A Dual System of Acceptance Sampling. Technical Report No. 16. New Brunswick, NJ: The Statistics Center, Rutgers-The State University.
   Google Scholar
• Govindaraju, K., and V. Kuralmani. 1992. “Modified Tables for the Selection of QSS–1 Quick Switching System for a Given (AQL, LQL).” Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 21 (4): 1103–1123.10.1080/03610919208813067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurniati, N., R. H. Yeh, and C. W. Wu. 2015. “Designing a Variables Two-plan Sampling System of Type TNTVSS-(nT, nN; k) for Controlling Process Fraction Nonconforming with Unilateral Specification Limit.” International Journal of Production Research 53 (7): 2011–2025.10.1080/00207543.2014.946159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. C., H. N. Hung, W. L. Pearn, and T. L. Kueng. 2002. “On the distribution of the estimated process yield index Spk.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 18 (2): 111–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. J., and H. H. Kuo. 2014. “Multiple Comparisons with the Best for Supplier Selection.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 30 (7): 1083–1092.10.1002/qre.1599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. J., and W. L. Pearn. 2009. “Process Selection for Higher Production Yield Based on Capability Index.” Quality and Reliability Engineering International 26: 247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. W., S. W. Lin, and C. W. Wu. 2014. “A Resubmitted Sampling Scheme by Variables Inspection for Controlling Lot Fraction Nonconforming.” International Journal of Production Research 52 (12): 3744–3754.10.1080/00207543.2014.886028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. W., and C. W. Wu. 2014. “Design and Construction of a Variables Repetitive Group Sampling Plan for Unilateral Specification Limit.” Communications in Statistics – Simulation and Computation 43 (8): 1866–1878.10.1080/03610918.2013.810258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrin, I., Y. Parmet, and E. Schechtman. 2009. “Developing a Sampling Plan Based on Cpk.” Quality Engineering 21: 306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L., G. H. Lin, and K. H. Wang. 2004. “Normal Approximation to the Distribution of the Estimated Yield Index Spk.” Quality and Quantity 38 (1): 95–111.10.1023/B:QUQU.0000013245.13104.1d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romboski, L. D. 1969. “An Investigation of Quick Switching Acceptance Sampling System.” Doctoral diss., Rutgers – The State University, New Brunswick, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling, E. G., and D. V. Neubauer. 2008. Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control. 2nd ed. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. R., Y. T. Lu, and S. J. Wu. 2008. “Reliability Sampling Plans for Weibull Distribution with Limited Capacity of Test Facility.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 55 (3): 721–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W. 2012. “An Efficient Inspection Scheme for Variables Based on Taguchi Capability Index.” European Journal of Operational Research 223 (1): 116–122.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., M. Aslam, and C. H. Jun. 2012. “Variables Sampling Inspection Scheme for Resubmitted Lots Based on the Process Capability Index Cpk.” European Journal of Operational Research 217 (3): 560–566.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., M. Y. Liao, and J. C. Chen. 2012. “An Improved Approach for Constructing Lower Confidence Bound on Process Yield.” European Journal of Industrial Engineering 6 (3): 369–390.10.1504/EJIE.2012.046667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C. W., and S. W. Liu. 2014. “Developing a Sampling Plan by Variables Inspection for Controlling Lot Fraction of Defectives.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 38: 2303–2310.10.1016/j.apm.2013.10.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar