An integrated decision-making approach for designing and selecting product concepts based on QFD and cumulative prospect theory

References

• Abdellaoui, M., H. Bleichrodt, O. L’Haridon, and D. van Dolder. 2016. “Measuring Loss Aversion under Ambiguity: A Method to Make Prospect Theory Completely Observable.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 52 (1): 1–20.10.1007/s11166-016-9234-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akao, Y., and G. H. Mazur. 2003. “The Leading Edge in QFD: Past, Present and Future.” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 20 (1): 20–35.10.1108/02656710310453791
   Google Scholar
• Aral, S., and W. Dylan. 2011. “Creating Social Contagion through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks.” Management Science 57 (9): 1623–1639.10.1287/mnsc.1110.1421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avineri, E. 2006. “The Effect of Reference Point on Stochastic Network Equilibrium.” Transportation Science 40 (4): 409–420.10.1287/trsc.1060.0158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharati, B., S. Azarm, and T. P. K. Kannan. 2006. “A Decision Support System for Product Design Selection: A Generalized Purchase Modeling Approach.” Decision Support Systems 42 (1): 333–350.10.1016/j.dss.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, A., B. Sarkar, and S. K. Mukherjee. 2005. “Integrating AHP with QFD for Robot Selection under Requirement Perspective.” International Journal of Production Research 43 (17): 3671–3685.10.1080/00207540500137217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt, H., J. M. Abellan-Perpiñan, J. L. Pinto-Prades, and I. Mendez-Martinez. 2007. “Resolving Inconsistencies in Utility Measurement under Risk: Tests of Generalizations of Expected Utility.” Management Science 53 (3): 469–482.10.1287/mnsc.1060.0647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleichrodt, H., U. Schmidt, and H. Zank. 2009. “Additive Utility in Prospect Theory.” Management Science 55 (5): 863–873.10.1287/mnsc.1080.0978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodily, S. E. 1979. “Note – A Delegation Process for Combining Individual Utility Functions.” Management Science 25 (10): 1035–1041.10.1287/mnsc.25.10.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulter, J., D. J. Morrice, and P. W. Mullarkey. 2001. “A Multiple Attribute Utility Theory Approach to Ranking and Selection.” Management Science 47 (6): 800–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevalli, J. A., and P. C. Miguel. 2008. “Review, Analysis and Classification of the Literature on QFD–Types of Research, Difficulties and Benefits.” International Journal of Production Economics 114 (2): 737–754.10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., and M. L. Wu. 2002. “Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods.” Quality Engineering 15 (1): 23–35.10.1081/QEN-120006708
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., and M. L. Wu. 2005. “A Systematic Approach to Quality Function Deployment with a Full Illustrative Example.” Omega 33 (2): 119–139.10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. H., and W. C. Ko. 2009. “Fuzzy Linear Programming Models for New Product Design Using QFD with FMEA.” Applied Mathematical Modelling 33 (2): 633–647.10.1016/j.apm.2007.11.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., R. Y. K. Fung, and J. Tang. 2005. “Fuzzy Expected Value Modelling Approach for Determining Target Values of Engineering Characteristics in QFD.” International Journal of Production Research 43 (17): 3583–3604.10.1080/00207540500032046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., R. Y. K. Fung, and J. Tang. 2006. “Rating Technical Attributes in Fuzzy QFD by Integrating Fuzzy Weighted Average Method and Fuzzy Expected Value Operator.” European Journal of Operational Research 174 (3): 1553–1566.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delikouras, S. 2014. “Disappointment Aversion Preferences and the Credit Spread Puzzle.” SSRN Electronic Journal 24 (7): 1073–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., N. Luo, and H. Liang. 2015. “Consensus Building in Multiperson Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Representation Structures: A Perspective Based on Prospect Theory.” Applied Soft Computing 35 (10): 898–910.10.1016/j.asoc.2015.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egozcue, M. J. 2012. “Gains from Diversification: A Regret Theory Approach.” Economics Bulletin 32 (1): 204–219.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, R. Y. K., Y. Chen, and J. Tang. 2006. “Estimating the Functional Relationships for Quality Function Deployment under Uncertainties.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157 (1): 98–120.10.1016/j.fss.2005.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, K. Y., C. K. Kwong, K. W. M. Siu, and K. M. Yu. 2012. “A Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm Approach to Rule Mining for Affective Product Design.” Expert Systems with Applications 39 (8): 7411–7419.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, B., and P. P. Wakker. 2015. “Regret Theory: A Bold Alternative to the Alternatives.” The Economic Journal 125 (583): 493–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X. D., and X. Y. Zhou. 2010. “Portfolio Choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory: An Analytical Treatment.” Management Science 57 (2): 315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martı́nez. 2000. “A Fusion Approach for Managing Multi-granularity Linguistic Term Sets in Decision-Making.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114 (1): 43–58.10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00093-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martinez. 2008. “A Fuzzy Linguistic Methodology to Deal with Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets.” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 16 (2): 354–370.10.1109/TFUZZ.2007.896353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W. 2008. “Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications-a Literature Review.” European Journal of Operational Research 186 (1): 211–228.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak, E. E. 2004. “Fuzzy Multiple Objective Programming Framework to Prioritize Design Requirements in Quality Function Deployment.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 47 (2–3): 149–163.10.1016/j.cie.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D. H., and K. J. Kim. 2009. “Robustness Indices and Robust Prioritization in QFD.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2): 2651–2658.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornish, L. J., and K. T. Ulrich. 2011. “Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas.” Management Science 57 (1): 107–128.10.1287/mnsc.1100.1247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothiyal, A., V. Spinu, and Peter P. Wakker. 2014. “An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory for Predicting Choice under Ambiguity.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 48 (1): 1–17.10.1007/s11166-014-9185-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak, O., and C. Kahraman. 2005. “Fuzzy Multi-attribute Selection Among Transportation Companies Using Axiomatic Design and Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Information Sciences 170 (2–4): 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, C. K., and H. Bai. 2002. “A Fuzzy AHP Approach to the Determination of Importance Weights of Customer Requirements in Quality Function Deployment.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 13 (5): 367–377.10.1023/A:1019984626631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong, C. K., Y. Ye, Y. Chen, and K. L. Choy. 2011. “A Novel Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Approach to Prioritizing Engineering Characteristics in QFD under Uncertainties.” International Journal of Production Research 49 (19): 5801–5820.10.1080/00207543.2010.520043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H. I., H. Y. Kang, C. Y. Yang, and C. Y. Lin. 2010. “An Evaluation Framework for Product Planning Using FANP, QFD and Multi-choice Goal Programming.” International Journal of Production Research 48 (13): 3977–3997.10.1080/00207540902950845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., and X. Chen. 2014. “Extension of the TOPSIS Method Based on Prospect Theory and Trapezoidal Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers for Group Decision Making.” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 23 (2): 231–247.10.1007/s11518-014-5244-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L., J. F. Tang, X. G. Luo, J. M. Xu, and J. Xu. 2009. “An Integrated Method of Rough Set, Kano’s Model and AHP for Rating Customer Requirements’ Final Importance.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 (3): 7045–7053.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. L., K. S. Chin, and X. G. Luo. 2012. “Determining the Final Priority Ratings of Customer Requirements in Product Planning by MDBM and BSC.” Expert Systems with Applications 39 (1): 1243–1255.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddulapalli, A. K., S. Azarm, and A. Boyars. 2007. “Sensitivity Analysis for Product Design Selection with an Implicit Value Function.” European Journal of Operational Research 180 (3): 1245–1259.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partovi, F. Y. 2006. “An Analytic Model for Locating Facilities Strategically.” Omega 34 (1): 41–55.10.1016/j.omega.2004.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partovi, F. Y. 2007. “An Analytical Model of Process Choice in the Chemical Industry.” International Journal of Production Economics 105 (1): 213–227.10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z., and A. Skowron. 2007. “Rudiments of Rough Sets. Information.” Science 177 (1): 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, J., X. Liu, and W. Pedrycz. 2015. “An Extended VIKOR Method Based on Prospect Theory for Multiple Attribute Decision Making under Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Environment.” Knowledge-based Systems 86 (9): 116–130.10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raharjo, H., A. C. Brombacher, and M. Xie. 2008. “Dealing with Subjectivity in Early Product Design Phase: A Systematic Approach to Exploit Quality Function Deployment Potentials.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 55 (1): 253–278.10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, U., and H. Zank. 2008. “Risk Aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory.” Management Science 54 (1): 208–216.10.1287/mnsc.1070.0762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, U., C. Starmer, and R. Sugden. 2008. “Third-generation Prospect Theory.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 36 (3): 203–223.10.1007/s11166-008-9040-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1992. “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4): 297–323.10.1007/BF00122574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , L., Z. X. Zhang , and Y. M. Wang. 2015. “A Prospect Theory-based Interval Dynamic Reference Point Method for Emergency Decision Making.” Expert Systems with Applications 42 (23): 9379–9388.10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. 2005. “On Method for Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making Problems with Uncertain Multiplicative Preference Information on Alternatives.” Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making 4 (2): 131–139.10.1007/s10700-004-5869-2
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z. S. 2009. “An Interactive Approach to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making with Multigranular Uncertain Linguistic Information.” Group Decision and Negotiation 18 (2): 119–145.10.1007/s10726-008-9131-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, L. Y., L. P. Khoo, and Z. W. Zhong. 2008. “A Rough Set Enhanced Fuzzy Approach to Quality Function Deployment.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 37 (5–6): 613–624.10.1007/s00170-007-0989-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar