Enterprise modelling: from early languages to models transformation

References

• Abrial, J. R. 1974. Data Semantics in Data Base Management. Edited by Klimbie Koffeman, 1–57. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• AMICE. 1993. CIMOSA: Open Architecture for CIM. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ATHENA. 2003. Advanced Technologies for Interoperability of Heterogeneous Enterprise Networks and Their Applications. FP6-2002-IST-1, Integrated Project.
   Google Scholar
• Bazoun, H. 2015. “Contribution to a Methodology for Service Systems Modeling and Engineering through a Model Driven Approach: Architecture, Transformation and Model Simulation”. PhD thesis, University of Bordeaux.
   Google Scholar
• Bouaza, M. 1995. La Norme STEP. Paris: Hermès.
   Google Scholar
• Bourey, J. P., R. Grangel, G. Doumeingts, and A. Berre. 2007. “Deliverable DTG2.3 from the INTEROP Project.” Report on Model Driven Interoperability. Accessed May 2014. http://interop-vlab.eu
   Google Scholar
• Braesch, C., A. Haurat, and J. M. Beving. 1995. L’entreprise-Système. in La Modélisation Systémique En Entreprise. Paris: Hermès.
   Google Scholar
• C4ISR. 1998. Levels of Information Systems Interoperability (LISI). Washington: Architecture Working Group (AWG).
   Google Scholar
• CEN/ISO. 2009. Part 1: Framework for Enterprise Interoperability, Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 11354-1.
   Google Scholar
• CEN/ISO. 2011. Part 2: Maturity Model for Assessing Enterprise Interoperability, CEN/ISO 11354-2, Draft for Proposed Activation of WI 00310094, Document N270.
   Google Scholar
• Chapurlat, V., M. Larnac, E. Lamine, and J. Magnier. 1999. “Definition of a Formal Analysis Framework for Existing Enterprise Modelling Approaches.” Proceedings of the Annual conference of ICIMS-NOE, Life Cycle Approaches to Production Systems: Management, Control, Supervision (ASI), Leuven, Belgium, September 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. 2007. “Enterprise-Control System Integration – An International Standard.” International Journal of Production Research 43 (20): 4335–4357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D. 2013. “Framework for Enterprise Interoperability and Maturity Model (CEN/ISO 11354).” In Interoperability for Enterprise Software and Applications, edited by H. Panetto and N. Boudjilda, 15–22. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., G. Doumeingts, and F. Vernadat. 2008. “Architectures for Enterprise Integration and Interoperability: Past, Present and Future.” Computers in Industry 59 (7): 647–659.10.1016/j.compind.2007.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., B. Vallespir, and G. Doumeingts. 1997. “GRAI Integrated Methodology and Its Mapping onto Generic Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology.” Computers in Industry 33 (2–3): 387–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., B. Vallespir and G. Doumeingts. 2002a. “Designing Manufacturing Systems: Contribution to the Development of an Enterprise Engineering Methodology (EEM) within the Frame of GERAM.” Proceedings of the IFAC World Congress, Barcelona, Spain, July 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., B. Vallespir, and G. Doumeingts. 2002b. “Developing an Unified Enterprise Modelling Language (UEML) – Roadmap and Requirements.” Proceedings of the 3rd IFIP Working Conference on Infrastructures For Virtual Enterprise (PROVE), Sesimbra, Portugal, May 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D., and F. Vernadat. 2001. “Standardisation on Enterprise Modelling and Integration: Achievements, on-Going Works and Future Perspectives.” Proceedings of the 10ème symp. Information Control in Manufacturing (INCOM), Vienna, Austria, September 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T., and R. Jones. 1999. “Organisational Interoperability Maturity Model for C2.” Proceedings of the Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Washington, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Di Leva, A., F. Vernadat, and D. Bizier. 1987. “Information System Analysis and Conceptual Database Design in Production Environments with M.” Computers in Industry 9 (3): 183–217.10.1016/0166-3615(87)90037-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumeingts, G., B. Vallespir, and D. Chen. 1995. “Methodologies for Designing CIM Systems: A Survey.” Computers in Industry 25 (3): 263–280.10.1016/0166-3615(94)00036-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doumeingts, G., B. Vallespir, M. Zanettin, and D. Chen. 1992. “GIM, GRAI Integrated Methodology – A Methodology for Designing CIM Systems.” Version 1.0, LAP/GRAI. Université Bordeaux 1.
   Google Scholar
• EIF. 2004. European Interoperability Framework. CompTIA: European Industry Association, White Paper – ICT Industry Recommendations. http://www.comptia.org.
   Google Scholar
• GERAM. 1999. “GERAM: Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology.” Version 1.6.1, IFIP–IFAC Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration, March.
   Google Scholar
• GRPGT5. 1999. “La Modélisation D’Entreprise : Le Point De Vue Productique.” Working Group #5 «Enterprise Modelling» of the Groupement Pour La Recherche En Productique, December.
   Google Scholar
• Guedria, W., D. Chen and Y. Naudet. 2009. “A Maturity Model for Enterprise Interoperability”. Proceedings of the IFAC/IFIP workshop Enterprise Integration, Interoperability and Networking (EI2N), Vilamoura, Portugal, November 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Guedria W., Y. Naudet, and D. Chen. 2008. “Interoperability Maturity Models – Survey and Comparison.” Proceedings of the IFAC/IFIP Workshop Enterprise Integration, Interoperability and Networking (EI2 N), Monterrey, Mexico, November 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D. 1997. The Zachman Framework: An Introduction, the Data Administration Newsletter [Published online]. The Data Administration Newsletter.
   Google Scholar
• IDEAS. 2002. Roadmaps, Annex 1 – Description of Work. IDEAS Consortium: Interoperability Development for Enterprise Application and Software, Thematic Network. Brussels: IDEAS consortium.
   Google Scholar
• INTEROP. 2003. Proposal Part B. Interoperability Research for Networked Enterprises Applications and Software, Network of Excellence. Brussels: Interop NoE consortium.
   Google Scholar
• INTEROP. 2006. Enterprise Interoperability – Framework and Knowledge Corpus. INTEROP DI Deliverable DI 1.2, December.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2006. Enterprise Integration – Framework for Enterprise Modelling, ISO 19439:2006. ISO/TC 184/SC 5.
   Google Scholar
• Kamsu-Foguem, B., and V. Chapurlat. 2006. “Requirements Modelling and Formal Analysis Using Graph Operations.” International Journal of Production Research 44 (17): 3451–3470.10.1080/00207540500499377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasunic M., and W. Anderson. 2004. Measuring Systems Interoperability: Challenges and Opportunities. Software Engineering Measurement and Analysis Initiative. Technical note, cmu/sei-2004-tn-003. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, G., S. Fewell, and W. Richer. 2005. “An Organisational Interoperability Agility Model.” 10th ICCRTS, McLean, VA, USA, June 13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kosanke, K., F. Vernadat, and M. Zelm. 1999. “CIMOSA: Enterprise Engineering and Integration.” Computers in Industry 40 (2–3): 83–97.10.1016/S0166-3615(99)00016-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillehagen, F., and J. Krogstie. 2002. “Active Knowledge Models and Enterprise Knowledge Management.” In Enterprise Inter- and Intra-Organizational Integration, edited by K.  Kosanke, R. Jochem, J. G. Nell and A. Ortiz Bas, 91–99. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Menzel, C. P., and R. J. Mayer. 1998. “The IDEF Family of Languages.” In Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, edited by P. Bernus, K. Mertins  and G. Schmidt, 209–242. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mertins, K., and F. W. Jaekel. 1998. “MO2GO: User Oriented Enterprise Models for Organisational and IT Solutions.” In Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, edited by P. Bernus, K. Mertins and G. Schmidt, 649–664. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MSEE. 2012. Annex 1 Description of Work. Manufacturing SErvice Ecosystem Project, FoF-ICT-2011.7.3. Accessed May 2014. http://msee-ip.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Neaga, E. I., and J. A. Harding. 2005. “An Enterprise Modeling and Integration Framework Based on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.” International Journal of Production Research 43 (6): 1089–1108.10.1080/00207540412331322939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OMG. 2005. MDA Guide Version 1.0. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?omg/03-06-01.
   Google Scholar
• Panetto, H., F. Mayer, and P. Lhoste. 2001. “Unified Modelling Language for Meta-Modelling: Towards Constructs Definition.” Proceedings of the 10th Symposium Information Control in Manufacturing (INCOM), Vienna, Austria, September 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, M., J. Goossenaerts, M. Gruninger, J. G. Nell, and F. Vernadat. 1997. “Formal Semantics of Enterprise Models.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Enterprise Integration and Modelling Technology (ICEIMT), Turin, Italy, October 28–30. edited by K. Kosanke and J. Nell. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PTA. 1992. Norme Expérimentale Base-PTA. CCGA, ISMCM/CEST, Experimental Standard Z 68-901, September.
   Google Scholar
• Salvato, G., I. J. Leontaritis, P. Winstone, M. Zelm, D. Rivers-Moore, and D. Salvato. 1999. “Presentation and Exchange of Business Models with CIMOSA-XML.” Computers in Industry 40 (2–3): 125–139.10.1016/S0166-3615(99)00019-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, A. W. 1994. Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-79142-0
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, A. W. 2000. Business Process Frameworks. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, A. W., and M. Nüttgens. 2000. “ARIS Architecture and Reference Models for Business Process Management.” In Business Process Management, 301–304. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, A. W., and K. Schneider. 1998. “ARIS – Architecture of Integrated Information Systems.” In Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, edited by P. Bernus, K. Mertins, and G. Schmidt, 605–624. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shorter, D. 2000. Enterprise Engineering and Integration – The Standardization Scene. CEN TC310/WG1, April.
   Google Scholar
• Tardieu, H., A. Rochfeld, and R. Colletti. 1983. La Méthode MERISE, Principes Et Outils. Paris: Les éditions d’organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Tolk, A., and J. A. Muguira. 2003. “The Levels of Conceptual Interoperability Model.” Proceedings of the 2003 Fall Simulation Interoperability Workshop, Orlando, FL, USA, September 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Vallespir, B. 2003. “Modélisation D’entreprise Et Architecture De Conduite Des Systèmes De Production”. Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches dissertation, Université Bordeaux 1.
   Google Scholar
• Vallespir, B., C. Braesch, V. Chapurlat, and D. Crestani. 2003. “L’intégration En Modélisation D’entreprise : Les Chemins D’UEML.” Proceedings of the 4th Conférence Francophone de Modélisation et Simulation (MOSIM), Toulouse, France, April 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Vallespir, B., and G. Doumeingts. 2007a. The GRAI Method Part 1: Global Modelling. Lecture presentation, Interop Network of Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Vallespir, B., and G. Doumeingts. 2007b. The GRAI Method Part 2: Detailed Modelling and Methodological Issues. Lecture Presentation, Interop Network of Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Vallespir, B., G. Doumeingts, and D. Chen. 2001. Problems and Research Orientation for UEML: A Point of View. Oral Presentation at IFAC-IFIP Task force Interest Group on UEML, Vienna, Austria, September 19.
   Google Scholar
• Vernadat, F. 1998. “The CIMOSA Languages.” In Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, edited by P. Bernus, K. Mertins and G. Schmidt, 251–272. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vernadat, F. 1999a. Techniques De Modélisation En Entreprise : Application Aux Processus Opérationnels. Paris: Economica, Collection Gestion.
   Google Scholar
• Vernadat, F. 1999b. “Unified Enterprise Modelling Language (UEML).” Oral presentation at IFAC-IFIP Task force Interest group on UEML, Paris, France, December 16.
   Google Scholar
• Vernadat, F. 2001. “UEML: Towards a Unified Enterprise Modelling Language.” Proceedings of the 3rd Conférence Francophone de Modélisation et Simulation (MOSIM), Troyes, France, April 25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Vernadat, F. 2002. “UEML: Towards a Unified Enterprise Modelling Language.” International Journal of Production Research 40 (17): 4309–4321.10.1080/00207540210159626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., G. Zacharewicz, M. K. Traore, and D. Chen. 2017. “Use of Fuzzy Clustering for Discrete Event Simulation Model Construction.” Proceedings of the IFAC World Congress, Toulouse, France, July 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, T. J. 1996. “An Overview of PERA and the Purdue Methodology.” In Architectures for Enterprise Integration, edited by P. Bernus, L. Nemes, and T. J. Williams, 127–161. London: Chapman Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharewicz, G., H. Bazoun, J. Ribault, Y. Ducq, and H. Boyer. 2016. “SLMToolBox: Enterprise Service Process Modelling and Simulation by Coupling DEVS and Services Workflow.” Indersciences International Journal of Simulation and Process Modeling 11 (6): 453–467.
   Google Scholar
• Zachman, J. A. 2008. The Concise Definition of the Zachman Framework. Monument: Zachman International.
   Google Scholar
• Zelm, M. 1995. CIMOSA: A Primer on Key Concepts, Purpose and Business Value. Technical Report. Stuttgart: CIMOSA Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zelm, M. 2001. Enterprise Modelling – Constructs Comparison (State of the Art). Technical Report. Stuttgart: CIMOSA Association.
   Google Scholar