Technological forecasting using mixed methods approach

References

• Albright, Richard E. 2002. “What Can Past Technology Forecasts Tell Us About the Future?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 69 (5): 443–464. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(02)00186-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altshuller, Genrich S. 1979. Creativity as an Exact Science. Moscow: Sovietskoe radio Publishing House. (in Russia).
   Google Scholar
• Altshuller, Genrich S. 1991. To Find an Idea: Introduction to the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. 2nd ed. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Jenny K., and Therese Wemnér. 2008. A Strategic Decision-Making Model for Supply Chain. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Jon Scott. 1985. Long-Range Forecasting: From Crystal Ball to Computer. 2nd ed. New York:  John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Jon Scott. 2002. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioner. Edited by Jon Scott Armstrong. 1st ed. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, Jesse H. 2014. “Cars and Civilization.” William & Myrtle Harris Distinguished Lectureship in Science and Civilization, 16. California Institute of Technology. http://phe.rockefeller.edu/docs/CarsandCivilization.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ausubel, Jesse H, and Cesare Marchetti. 1996. “Elektron: Electrical Systems in Retrospect and Prospect.” IEEE Engineering Management Review 125 (3): 139–169. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031168802%partnerID=40%md5=656ea1e801932128279667bd066343d9.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, Robert U. 1969. Technological Forecasting and Long-Range Planning. New York: McGraw-Hill book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bezos, Jeff, and Werner Vogels. 2012. “2012 Re:Invent Day 2: Fireside Chat with Jeff Bezos & Werner Vogels.” https://youtu.be/O4MtQGRIIuA.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, William. 2002. “The System Archetypes.” The Systems Modeling Workbook.
   Google Scholar
• Cascini, Gaetano, Niccolò Becattini, Igor Kaikov, Sebastian Koziolek, Dmitry Kucharavy, Christopher Nikulin, Pierluigi Petrali, et al. 2015. “FORMAT - Building an Original Methodology for Technology Forecasting Through Researchers Exchanges Between Industry and Academia.” Procedia Engineering 131: 1084–1093. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.426.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, John C., Satinder K. Mullick, and Donald D. Smith. 1971. “How to Choose the Right Forecasting Technique.” Harvard Business Review, no. July.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, Joseph F, Philippe Durance, and Michel Godet. 2010. “Strategic Foresight Issue: Introduction.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77: 1423–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage, cop.
   Google Scholar
• De Guio, Roland, Dmitry Kucharavy, and Arturo Niño de Zepeda. 2013. “Hybrid Logistic Curves and Contradiction Based Approach for Long-Term Technology Forecasting.” 26th European Conference on Operational Research. Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Eto, Hajime. 2003. “The Suitability of Technology Forecasting/Foresight Methods for Decision Systems and Strategy: A Japanese View.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 70 (3): 231–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, Charles H. 1999. Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Firat, Ayse Kaya, Wei Lee Woon, and Stuart Madnick. 2008. “Technological Forecasting – A Review.” CISL# 2008-15. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. C., and R. H. Pry. 1971. “A Simple Substitution Model of Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 3 (1): 75–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, Jay Wright. 1971. “Counterintuitive Behavior of Social Systems.” Theory and Decision 2 (2): 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fye, Shannon R., Steven M. Charbonneau, Jason W. Hay, and Carie A. Mullins. 2013. “An Examination of Factors Affecting Accuracy in Technology Forecasts.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (6): 1222–1231. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, Jerome C., and Theodore J. Gordon. 2003. Futures Research Methodology. Version 2.0. Washington, DC: Millennium Project. http://www.millennium-project.org/millennium/FRM-v2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, Jerome C., and Theodore J. Gordon. 2012. Futures Research Methodology. Version 3.0. Washington, DC: Millennium Project. https://www.millennium-project.org/publications-2/futures-research-methodology-version-3-0/
   Google Scholar
• Godet, Michel. 2012. “To Predict or to Build the Future.” The Futurist, May–June, 46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Steven A., Stefan Gray, Jean Luc de Kok, Ariella E.R. Helfgott, Barry O’Dwyer, Rebecca Jordan, and Angela Nyaki. 2015. “Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping as a Participatory Approach to Analyze Change, Preferred States, and Perceived Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems.” Ecology and Society 20 (2). doi:10.5751/ES-07396-200211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grübler, Arnulf. 1990. The Rise and Fall of Infrastructures: Dynamics of Evolution and Technological Change in Transport, edited by Werner A. Muller. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Grübler, Arnulf. 2003. Technology and Global Change. Cambridge: International Institute of Applied System Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Grundstein, Michel. 2011. “Three Postulates That Change Knowledge Management Paradigm.” In New Research on Knowledge Management Models and Methods, edited by Huei-Tse Hou, 1–22. Rijeka: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Haegeman, Karel, Elisabetta Marinelli, Fabiana Scapolo, Andrea Ricci, and Alexander Sokolov. 2013. “Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): From Combination to Integration?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (4): 386–397. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(13)00039-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hyndman, Rob J. 2019. “A Brief History of Forecasting Competitions.” International Journal of Forecasting. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyndman, Rob J., and George Athanasopoulos. 2018. Forecasting: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. Melbourne: OTexts. https://otexts.com/fpp2/.
   Google Scholar
• IIASA. 2011. IIASA Logistic Substitution Model II – User Guide. https://previous.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/researchPrograms/TransitionstoNewTechnologies/download.en.html
   Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, Hannu. 1996. “Comparison and Analysis of Diffusion Models.” In Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology, edited by Karlheinz Kautz, and Jan Pries-Heje, 65–82. Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-34982-4_6.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, Erich. 1967. Technological Forecasting in Perspective. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2002. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: A Perspective on Intuitive Judgment and Choice.” Nobel prize lecture 8 (1): 351–401.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Kindle ed. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Daekook, Wooseok Jang, Hyeonjeong Lee, and Hyunjoung No. 2013. “A Review on Technology Forecasting Methods and Their Application Area.” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 7 (4): 394–398. http://www.waset.org/publications/2934.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, Clive, and Robert Phaal. 2020. “Technology Roadmapping: Industrial Roots, Forgotten History and Unknown Origins.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 155: 119967. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khomenko, Nikolai. 1999. Education Materials for OTSM Development: State of Art 1980-1997. Piangteck: LG-Electronics Learning Center.
   Google Scholar
• Khomenko, Nikolai. 2010. “General Theory on Powerful Thinking (OTSM): Digest of Evolution, Theoretical Background, Tools for Practice and Some Domain of Application.” 6th TRIZ Symposium. Tokyo, Japan. http://www.osaka-gu.ac.jp/php/nakagawa/TRIZ/eTRIZ/epapers/e2011Papers/eKhomenkoTRIZSymp2010/EI01eS-Khomenko%28Canada%29-OTSM_Keynote-100729.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Khomenko, Nikolai, Roland De Guio, and Denis Cavallucci. 2009. “Enhancing ECN’s Abilities to Address Inventive Strategies Using OTSM-TRIZ.” International Journal of Collaborative Engineering 1 (1–2): 98–113. doi:10.1504/IJCE.2009.027441.
   Google Scholar
• Khomenko, Nikolai, Roland De Guio, Laurent Lelait, and Igor Kaikov. 2007. “A Framework for OTSM-TRIZ Based Computer Support to Be Used in Complex Problem Management.” International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology (IJCAT 30 (1/2): 88–104. doi:10.1504/IJCAT.2007.015700.
   Google Scholar
• Khomenko, Nikolai, and Hongyul Yoon. 2010. “OTSM-TRIZ as a Response to the Request from the Specialized and Interdisciplinary Problem Situations.” In Korea TRIZCON 2010, 16. Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Kucharavy, Dmitry, David Damand, Samia Chehbi-Gamoura, Marc Barth, and Stéphane Mornay. 2020. “Entrepôt Du Futur: Le Concept de Cartographie de Contradictions.” Logistique & Management 28 (1): 48–56. doi:10.1080/12507970.2019.1686436.
   Google Scholar
• Kucharavy, Dmitry, David Damand, Samia Gamoura, and Marc Barth. 2020. “Supporting Strategic Decision-Making in Manufacturing 4.0 with Mix of Qualitative and Quantitative Data Analysis.” In 13ème Conférence Internationale de Modélisation, Optimisation et Simulation (MOSIM’20), 5. Agadir, Maroc.
   Google Scholar
• Kucharavy, Dmitry, and Roland De Guio. 2008. “Technological Forecasting and Assessment of Barriers for Emerging Technologies.” IAMOT 2008. Dubai, UAE. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00282751/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, Harold A., and Murray Turoff. 2011. “Delphi: A Brief Look Backward and Forward.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (9): 1712–1719. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis, Spyros, and Michele Hibon. 2000. “The M3-Competition: Results, Conclusions and Implications.” International Journal of Forecasting 16: 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makridakis, Spyros, Steven C. Wheelwright, and Rob J. Hyndman. 1998. Forecasting: Methods and Applications. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, Cesare. 1980. “Society as a Learning System – Discovery, Invention, and Innovation Cycles Revisited.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 18 (4): 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti, Cesare, and Jesse H. Ausubel. 2012. “Quantitative Dynamics of Human Empires.” International Journal of Anthropology 27 (1–2): 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, Cesare, and Nebojsa Nakicenovic. 1979. “The Dynamics of Energy Systems and the Logistics Substitution Model.” International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Research Report 79–13: 71. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0018733822%partnerID=40%md5=0a97555962a6b2723819d1be37614f86.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, Joseph Paul. 1972. Technological Forecasting for Decision Making. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 1st ed. New York: Elsevier Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, Joseph Paul. 1993. Technological Forecasting for Decision Making. Engineering and Technology Management. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, and Jørgen Randers. 1992. Beyond the Limits. Post Mills. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. 1972. The Limits to Growth. 5th print. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, Donella H., Jørgen Randers, and Dennis L. Meadows. 2004. Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Vermont: Chelsea Green.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Perrin S. 1994. “Bi-Logistic Growth.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47 (1): 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Perrin S., Jason W. Yung, and Jesse H. Ausubel. 1999. “A Primer on Logistic Growth and Substitution: The Mathematics of the Loglet Lab Software.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 61 (3): 247–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, Ian. 2010. “The Development of Technology Foresight: A Review.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 77 (9): 1448–1456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, Luiz C.M., Carlos A. S. Lima, and Rua Piedade. 2010. “On Trends and Rhythms in Scientific and Technological Knowledge Evolution: A Quantitative Analysis.” International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning 6 (1): 76–109.
   Google Scholar
• Modis, Theodore. 1993. “Technological Substitutions in the Computer Industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 43 (2): 157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modis, Theodore. 2002. Predictions - 10 Years Later. Geneva: Growth Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Modis, Theodore. 2013a. Natural Laws in the Service of the Decision Maker: How to Use Science-Based Methodologies to See More Clearly Further into the Future. Lugano: Growth Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Modis, Theodore. 2022. “Links Between Entropy, Complexity, and the Technological Singularity.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 176: 121457. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakano, Mikihisa. 2020. Supply Chain Management: Strategy and Organization. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nakicenovic, Nebojsa. 1984. Growth to Limits, Long Waves and the Dynamics of Technology. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Nakicenovic, Nebojsa, and Arnulf Grubler. 1991. Diffusion of Technologies and Social Behavior. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• National_Research_Council. 2010. Persistent Forecasting of Disruptive Technologies. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12557.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, Joseph D., and Alberto J. Cañas. 2006. “The Origins of the Concept Mapping Tool and the Continuing Evolution of the Tool.” Inforamation Visualisation 5: 175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Hyunkyu, Robert Phaal, Jae Yun Ho, and Eoin O’Sullivan. 2020. “Twenty Years of Technology and Strategic Roadmapping Research: A School of Thought Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 154. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascal, Amandine, Bénédicte Aldebert, and Audrey Rouziès. 2018. “Les Méthodes Mixtes En Systèmes d’information: Enjeux Épistémologiques et Méthodologiques.” Systèmes d’information & Management 23 (3): 99. doi:10.3917/sim.183.0099.
   Google Scholar
• Petropoulos, Fotios, Daniele Apiletti, Vassilios Assimakopoulos, Mohamed Zied Babai, Devon K. Barrow, Souhaib Ben Taieb, Christoph Bergmeir, et al. 2022. “Forecasting: Theory and Practice.” International Journal of Forecasting. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Alan L., and Technology Futures Analysis Methods Working Group. 2004. “Technology Futures Analysis: Toward Integration of the Field and New Methods.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 71: 287–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, Stephen P., and Timothy A. Judge. 2013. Organizational Behavior. 15th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, Thomas A., Scott W Cunningham, Alan L. Porter, Thomas W. Mason, Frederick A. Rossini, and Jerry Banks. 2011. Forecasting and Management of Technology. 2nd Revised ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rusjan, Borut. 2005. “Model for Manufacturing Strategic Decision Making.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25 (8): 740–761. doi:10.1108/01443570510608583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammut-Bonnici, Tanya, and David Galea. 2014. “PEST Analysis.” In Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, edited by Cary L. Cooper, 7. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaars, Steven P. 1989. Megamistakes: Forecasting and the Myth of Rapid Technological Change. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slupinski, Mateusz. 2013a. “Timeline View of Interest in Forecasting Tools Seen across Categories.” Milan, Italy. http://www.format-project.eu/deliverables/white-papers/timeline-view-of-technology-forecasting-tools-seen-across-categories/view.
   Google Scholar
• Slupinski, Mateusz. 2013b. “Technology Forecasting – State of the Art Update / Deliverable 2.3 FORMAT Project.” Milan, Italy. http://www.format-project.eu/deliverables/public-reports-and-white-papers/deliverable-2.3/view.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, John D. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vanston, John H. 2003. “Better Forecast, Better Plans, Better Results.” Research-Technology Management 46 (1): 47–58. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iri/rtm/2003/00000046/00000001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanston, John H., and Lawrence K. Vanston. 2005. “Testing the Tea Leaves: Evaluating the Validity of Forecasts.” IEEE Engineering Management Review 33 (1): 77–84. doi:10.1109/EMR.2005.25178.
   Google Scholar