The effect of clamping sequence on dimensional variability of a manufactured automotive sheet metal sub-assembly

References

• AIAG. 2006. Production Part Approval Process – Reference Manual, 4th ed.
   Google Scholar
• ASME. 2006. ASME B89. 4.19 Performance Evaluation of Laser-Based Spherical Coordinate Measurement Systems. New York, NY: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). 2010. Measurement System Analysis – Reference Manual, 4th ed.
   Google Scholar
• Bazrov, B. M., and A. I. Sorokin. 1982. “The Effect of Clamping Sequence on Workpiece Mounting Accuracy.” Soviet Engineering Research 2 (10): 92–95.
   Google Scholar
• Cai-qi, H., L. Zhong-qin, and L. Xin-min. 2006. “Concept Design of Checking Fixture for Auto-Body Parts Based on Neural Networks.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 30 (5): 574–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogun, C. 1992. “The Importance of the Application Sequence of Clamping Forces on Workpiece Accuracy.”
   Google Scholar
• Flack, D., and J. Hannaford. 2005. Good Practice Guide No. 80: Fundamental Good Practice in Dimensional Metrology. Teddington: NPL.
   Google Scholar
• Hocken, R. J., and P. H. Pereira. 2012. Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems (Vol. 2). Boca Raton: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 14253-1:2017. 2017. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Inspection by Measurement of Workpieces and Measuring Equipment – Part 1: Decision Rules for Proving Conformance or non-Conformance with Specifications. Switzerland, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2009. ISO10360-2. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Acceptance and Reverification Tests for CMM- Part2: CMMs Used for Measuring Size. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2016. ISO 10360-10 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Systems (CMS) — Part 10: Laser Trackers for Measuring Point-to-Point Distances. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, K., X. Zhou, and M. Li. 2013. “Computer-aided Checking Fixture Design System for Automobile Parts.” International Journal of Production Research 51 (20): 6045–6069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiraci, E., P. Franciosa, G. A. Turley, A. Olifent, A. Attridge, and M. A. Williams. 2017. “Moving Towards in-Line Metrology: Evaluation of a Laser Radar System for in-Line Dimensional Inspection for Automotive Assembly Systems.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91 (1): 69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiraci, E., A. Palit, M. Donnelly, A. Attridge, and M. A. Williams. 2020. “Comparison of in-Line and off-Line Measurement Systems Using a Calibrated Industry Representative Artefact for Automotive Dimensional Inspection.” Measurement 163: 108027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiraci, E., G. A. Turley, A. Attridge, A. Olifent, and M. A. Williams. 2016. “Evaluating the Capability of Laser Scanning to Measure an Automotive Artefact: A Comparison Study of Touch Trigger Probe and Laser-Scanning.” International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management 18 (4): 440–455.
   Google Scholar
• Matuszyk, T. I., M. Cardew-Hall, and B. F. Rolfe. 2007. “The Effect of Clamping Sequence on Dimensional Variability in Sheet Metal Assembly.” Virtual and Physical Prototyping 2 (3): 161–171.
   Google Scholar
• Phoomboplab, T., and D. Ceglarek. 2008. “Process Yield Improvement Through Optimum Design of Fixture Layouts in 3D Multistation Assembly Systems.” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 130 (6).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, G., W. Zhang, and M. Wan. 2006. “Analysis and Optimal Design of Fixture Clamping Sequence.”
   Google Scholar
• Raghu, A., and S. N. Melkote. 2004. “Analysis of the Effects of Fixture Clamping Sequence on Part Location Errors.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 44 (4): 373–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuominen, V. 2011. “Virtual Clamping in Automotive Production Line Measurement.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (12): 15065–15074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley, G. A., E. Kiraci, A. Olifent, A. Attridge, M. K. Tiwari, and M. A. Williams. 2014. “Evaluation of a Multi-Sensor Horizontal Dual arm Coordinate Measuring Machine for Automotive Dimensional Inspection.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 72 (9): 1665–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, X. J., and Y. Zhang. 2013. “A Novel Approach to Fixture Layout Optimization on Maximizing Dynamic Machinability.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 70: 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., and C. M. Chew. 2010. “A Geometric Approach to Automated Fixture Layout Design.” Computer-Aided Design 42 (3): 202–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar