467
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Personal Reflections

A theory of the setting: The transformation of unrepresented experience and play

References

  • Aulignier, P. 2015. The Violence of Interpretation: From Pictogram to Statement. London: New Library of Psychoanalysis.
  • Bion, W. R. 1961. Experiences in Groups and Other Publications. New York: Routledge.
  • Bleger, J. 1967a. “Psycho-Analysis of the Psycho-Analytic Frame.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 48: 511–519.
  • Bleger, J. 1967b. Symbiosis and Ambiguity: A Psychoanalytic Study. London: New Library of Psychoanalysis.
  • Brenner, C. 1979. “The Components of Psychic Conflict and its Consequences in Mental Life.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 48: 547–567. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1979.11926892
  • Brown, L. 2015. “Ruptures in the Analytic Setting and Disturbances in the Transformational Field of Dreams.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 84: 841–865. doi: 10.1002/psaq.12040
  • Civitarese, G. 2008. The Intimate Room: Theory and Technique of the Analytic Field. London: Routledge.
  • Civitarese, G. 2015. Truth and the Unconscious in Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
  • Cooper, S. 2009. “Familiar and Unfamiliar Forms of Interaction in the Ending Phases of Analysis.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 19 (5): 588–603. doi: 10.1080/10481880903232231
  • Cooper, S. 2010. A Disturbance in the Field: Essays in Transference-Countertransference. London: Routledge.
  • Cooper, S. 2018. “Playing in the Darkness: Use of the Object and Use of the Subject.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 66: 743–765. Plenary address, The American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, February 16, 2018. doi: 10.1177/0003065118796497
  • Feldman, M. 1997. “Projective Identification: The Analyst’s Contribution.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 78: 227–241.
  • Freud, S. 1914. “Remembering, Repeating, and Working Through.” S.E. 12: 147–156.
  • Freud, S. 1915. “Observations on Transference Love (Further Recommendations on the Technique of Psychoanalysis, II).” S.E. 12: 159–172.
  • Goldberg, P. 1989. “Actively Seeking the Holding Environment—Conscious and Unconscious Elements in the Building of a Therapeutic Framework.” Contemporary Psychoanalysis 25: 448–476. doi: 10.1080/00107530.1989.10746312
  • Goldberg, P. 2017. “Reconfiguring the Frame as a Dynamic Structure.” In Reconsidering the Moveable Frame in Psychoanalysis, edited by I. Tylum and A. Harris, 92–110. London: Routledge.
  • Green, A. 1975. “The Analyst, Symbolization, and Absence in the Analytic Setting (on Changes in Analytic Practice and Analytic Experience.) – in Memory of D.W. Winnicott.” The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 56: 9–22.
  • Green, A. 1997. “The Intuition of The Negative In Playing And Reality.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 78: 1071–1084.
  • Greenberg, J. 1995. “Psychoanalytic Technique and the Interactive Matrix.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 64: 1–22. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1995.11927441
  • Huizinga, J. 1932. Homo Ludens. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Lafarge, L. 2018. “Termination and Repetition: The Dissolution of the Frame.” Paper presented at the IJP Centenary, Rye Brook, New York. October, 2018.
  • Laplanche, J. 1999. Essays on Otherness. London: Routledge.
  • Lemma, A. 2014. “The Body of the Analyst and the Analytic Setting: Reflections on the Embodied Setting and the Symbiotic Transference.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 95: 225–244. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12147
  • Meltzer, D. 1975. “The Relation of Autism to Obsessional Mechanisms in General.” In Explorations in Autism: A Psycho-Analytical Study, edited by D. Meltzer, J. Bremner, S. Hoxter, D. Weddell and I. Wittenberg, 209–222. Strathtay: Clunie Press.
  • Modell, A. H. 1976. “The Holding Environment and the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 24: 258–307. doi: 10.1177/000306517602400202
  • Modell, A. H. 1989. “The Psychoanalytic Setting as a Container for Multiple Levels of Reality: A Perspective on the Theory of Psychoanalytic Treatment.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 9: 67–87. doi: 10.1080/07351698909533755
  • Modell, A. H. 1991. “The Therapeutic Relationship as a Paradoxical Experience.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1: 13–28. doi: 10.1080/10481889109538883
  • Ogden, T. 1991. “Analyzing the Matrix of Transference.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 72: 593–605.
  • Ogden, T. 1994. Subjects of Analysis. London: Karnac.
  • Ogden, T. 2004. “On Holding and Containing, Being and Dreaming.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 85 (6): 1349–1364. doi: 10.1516/T41H-DGUX-9JY4-GQC7
  • Ogden, T. 2016. “Destruction Reconceived: On Winnicott’s ‘The Use of an Object and Relating Through Identifications’.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 97 (5): 1243–1262. doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12554
  • Parsons, M. 2007. “Raiding the Inarticulate: The Internal Analytic Setting and Listening Beyond Countertransference.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 88: 1441–1456. doi: 10.1516/T564-G13J-400H-2W23
  • Pontalis, J. 1997. Ce Temps Qui Ne Passé Pas. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Quinodoz, D. 1992. “The Psychoanalytic Setting as the Instrument of the Container Function.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 73: 627–635.
  • Roussillon, R. 2011. Primitive Agony and Symbolization. London: Karnac.
  • Sandler, J. 1979. The Anti-Regressive Tendency.
  • Segal, H. 1962. “The Curative Factors in Psycho-Analysis: Contributions to Discussion.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 43: 212–213.
  • Steiner, J. 2006. “Interpretative Enactments and the Analytic Setting.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87: 315–328. doi: 10.1516/F283-H4RJ-X1DT-GF35
  • Stevens, W. 1941. The Noble Rider and the Sound of Words. Lecture at Princeton University.
  • Winnicott, D. 1956. “Primary Maternal Preoccupation.” In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, 300–305. New York: Int. U. Press. 1965.
  • Winnicott, D. 1963. “Communicating and Not Communicating, Leading to Study of Certain Opposites.” In The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, 179–192. New York, NY: International University Press.
  • Winnicott, D. 1969. “The Use of an Object.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 50: 711–716.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.