Transference and transference interpretation revisited: Why a parsimonious model of practice may be useful

References

• Baranger, M., and W. Baranger. 1969. “La Situacion Analitica como campo dinamico. Rev. Uruguaya de Psicoanalisis, 4: 3–54. Published in 2008 as The Analytic Situation as a Dynamic Field.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 89: 795–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00074.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. 1962. Learning from Experience. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. 1965. Transformations: Change from Learning to Growth. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. 1970. Attention and Interpretation: A Scientific Approach to Insight in Psycho-Analysis and Groups, 34. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, R. 2015. Between Mind and Brain: Models of the Mind and Models in the Mind. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, S. 2012. “The use and Misuse of Transference Interpretation.” Chap. 12 In Independent Psychoanalysis Today, edited by Paul Williams, John Keene, Dirmen Sira, 335–360. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri, J., ed. 2006. Psychoanalysis: From Practice to Theory. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri, J., ed. 2012. Putting Theory to Work: How are Theories Actually Used in Practice? London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• de Alvarez de Toledo, L. 1996. “The Analysis Of ‘Associating’, ‘Interpreting’ and ‘Words’: Use of this Analysis to Bring Unconscious Fantasies into the Present and to Achieve Greater Ego Integration.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 77: 291–317 (trans from a paper first published in 1954).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diercks, M. 2018. “Freud's ‘Transference’: Clinical Technique in the ‘Rat Man’ Case and Theoretical Conceptualization Compared.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 99 (1): 58–81 (Originally presented at the UCL Conference on Interpretation Today. December 2014). doi: 10.1111/1745-8315.12687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. 2007. “Addressing Parts of the Self.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 88 (2): 371–386. doi: 10.1516/KV77-7320-3553-7JGL
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro, A. 2002. “Some Implications of Bion's Thought: The Waking Dream and Narrative Derivatives.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 83 (3): 597–607. doi: 10.1516/WV5M-TR9T-9HPY-RFVJ
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1895. “Project for a Scientific Psychology (1950 [1895]).” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume 1. 1886–1899): Pre-Psycho-Analytic Publications and Unpublished Drafts, 281–391.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1905. Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, II vols. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis (1901, 1905).
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1912. “The Dynamics of Transference.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XII (1911–1913): The Case of Schreber, Papers on Technique and Other Works, 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1913. “On Beginning the Treatment (Further Recommendations on the Technique of Psycho-Analysis I).” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XII (1911–1913): The Case of Schreber, Papers on Technique and Other Works, 121–144.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1923. “Two Encyclopaedia Articles.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XVIII (1920–1922): Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Group Psychology and Other Works, 233–260.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, A. 1937. The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence. London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1938. An Outline of Psycho-Analysis. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXIII (1937–1939), 139–208. Moses and Monotheism, An Outline of Psycho-Analysis and Other Works.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2000. “The Central Phobic Position: A New Formulation of The Free Association Method.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81: 429–451. doi: 10.1516/0020757001599807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann, P. 1950. “On Counter-Transference1.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 31: 81–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, B. 1985. “Transference: The Total Situation.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 66: 447–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keene, J. 2012. “Boundary Issues in the recovery from trauma and abuse.” Chap. 6 In Independent Psychoanalysis Today, Williams Paul, Keene John, and Dirmen Sira, 205–232. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. 1978. “Affective Response of the Analyst to the Patient's Communications.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 59: 329–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M. 1932. The Psycho-Analysis of Children. The International Psycho-Analytical Library, 22:1–379. London: The Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Korzybski, Alfred. 1933. Science and Sanity. An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics. The International Non-Aristotelian Library Pub. Co., 747–761. Forest Hills, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kris, E. 1951. “Ego Psychology and Interpretation in Psychoanalytic Therapy.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 20: 15–30. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1951.11925828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm, R. Riesenberg. 1986. “Interpretation: The Past in the Present.” The International Review of Psycho-Analysis 13: 433–443.
   Google Scholar
• Meeting. 1993. “Meeting of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York, January 11, 1993. Transference as a Compromise Defense. Jacob A. Arlow.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 62: 702–704. doi: 10.1080/21674086.1993.11927400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racker, H. 1953. “A Contribution to the Problem of Counter-Transference1.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 34: 313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, H. 1972. “A Critical Appreciation of James Strachey's Paper on the Nature of the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 53: 455–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. 1976. Countertransference and Role-Responsiveness. International Review of Psycho-Analysis 3: 43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, R. 1973. “The Idea of Resistance.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 54: 259–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelton, R. ed. 2006. The Edinburgh International Encyclopaedia of Psychoanalysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solms, M. 2018. “The Neurobiological Underpinnings of Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy.” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 12: 294. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurling, Lawrence. 2015. The Psychoanalytic Craft: How to Develop as a Psychoanalytic Practitioner. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. 2017a. “Melanie Klein's Technique Then and Now.” Instit. Psa UK AV Proj. Videostream 1 (1): 15 (Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing). http://www.pep-web.org/document.php?id=ipsavs.001a.0015a&type=hitlist&num=1&query=fulltext1%2Cnatural(and((necessary%7Czone1%2Cparagraphs%7Czone2%2Cparagraphs%7Cauthor%2Csteiner%7Cviewperiod%2Cweek%7Csort%2Cauthor%2Ca#hit1.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. 2017b. Lectures on Technique by Melanie Klein: Edited with Critical Review. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Strachey, J. 1934. The Nature of the Therapeutic Action of Psycho-Analysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 15: 127–159.
   Google Scholar
• Strachey, J. 1955a. “Editor's Note to ‘Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume X (1909): Two Case Histories (‘Little Hans’ and the ‘Rat Man’), 256.
   Google Scholar
• Strachey, J. 1955b. Footnote 1 to page 47 in Freud, S. (1916). “Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis.” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XV (1915–1916): Introductory Lectures on Psycho-analysis (Parts I and II), 1–240.
   Google Scholar
• Symposium. 1937. “Symposium on the Theory of the Therapeutic Results of Psycho-Analysis1.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 18: 125–189.
   Google Scholar
• Talamo, P. B. 1997. “Bion: A Freudian Innovator.” British Journal of Psychotherapy 14: 47–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0118.1997.tb00351.x
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D. 1993. Some Thoughts on the Presentation and Discussion of the Clinical Material of Psychoanalysis. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 74: 1175–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D. 1997. Mutual Enactment in the Psychoanalytic Situation. The Perverse Transference and Other Matters. Essays in Honor of R. Horacio Etchegoyen (In Ahumada, J., et al.). New York and London: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D. 2011. “Inside and Outside the Window: Some Fundamental Elements in the Theory of Psychoanalytic Technique.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 92: 1367–1390. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00471.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D. 2019. “Ideas Prevented from Becoming Conscious: On Freud's Unconscious and the Theory of Psychoanalytic Technique.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/00207578.2019.1622425.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D., E. Alison, O. Bonard, A. Bronstaei, G. Bruns, A. Christopoulos, M. Diercks, et al. 2020 forthcoming. How Psychoanalysts Work: The Outcomes of a method to describe and compare psychoanalytic approaches. (In preparation).
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D., R. Basile, D. Birksted Breen, T. Bohm, P. Denis, A. Ferro, H. Hinz, A. Jemstedt, P. Mariotti, and J. Schubert. 2008. Psychoanalysis Comparable and Incomparable: The Evolution of a Method to Describe and Compare Psychoanalytic Approaches. London, New York, NY: Routledge (New Library of Psychoanalysis).
   Google Scholar
• Vermote, R. 2011. “On the Value of ‘Late Bion’ to Analytic Theory and Practice.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 92 (5): 1089–1098. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2011.00500.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. 1988. “One Psychoanalysis or Many.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 69: 5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. 1990. “Psychoanalysis: The Common Ground.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 71: 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widlöcher, D. 1994. A Case is not a Fact. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 75: 1233–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar