Practices of joint meaning creation. Dreams in psychoanalytic discussion

References

• Antaki, C. 2008. “Formulations in Psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy , edited by A. Peräkylä , C. Antaki , S. Vehviläinen , and I. Leudar , 26–42. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. 2011. “Six Kinds of Applied Conversation Analysis.” In Applied Conversation Analysis , edited by C. Antaki , 1–14. London : Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. and A. Peräkylä . in press. “Traumdarstellung als Narratoid. Epistemische Sprünge bei der Wiedergabe von Träumen.” In Verfestigungen in der Interaktion - Konstruktionen, sequenzielle Muster, kommunikative Gattungen , edited by B Weidner , K. König , L. Wegner , and W. Imo . Berlin : de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. J. 2010. “Klein, Bion, and Intersubjectivity: Becoming, Transforming, and Dreaming.” Psychoanalytic Dialogues 20 (6): 669–682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10481885.2010.532392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchholtz, M. , J. Spiekermann , and H. Kächele . 2015. “Rhythm and Blues – Amalie’s 152nd Session: From Psychoanalysis to Conversation and Metaphor Analysis – and Back Again.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 96 (3): 877–910. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassorla, R. M. 2005. “From Bastion to Enactment: The ‘Non-Dream’ in the Theatre of Analysis.” International Journal Psychoanalysis 86 (3): 699–719. doi: https://doi.org/10.1516/RR33-A8FH-V4RB-CDXJ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenichel, O. 1945. The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis . London : Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1900/2010. The Interpretation of Dreams . Translated from German original “Die Traumdeutung” and edited by James Strachey. New York : Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology . Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life . New York : Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984a. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology . Cambridge : Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984b. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis , edited by J. M. Atkinson , and J. Heritage , 299–345. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2012. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation , edited by T. Stivers , L. Mondada , and J. Steensig , 159–183. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. , and D. R. Watson . 1979. “Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology , edited by G. Psathas , 123–162. New York : Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbert, R. A. 2010. “The Anomalous Foundations of Dream Telling: Objective Solipsism and the Problem of Meaning.” Human Studies 33: 41–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-010-9134-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2015. Talking About Troubles in Conversation . Edited by P. Drew , J. Heritage , G. Lerner & A. Pomerantz . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, J. P. 2012. “The Manifest Dream is the Real Dream: The Changing Relationship between Theory and Practice in the Interpretation of Dreams.” In The Significance of Dreams. Bridging Clinical and Exraclinical Research in Psychoanalysis , edited by P. Fonagy , H. Kächele , M. Leuzinger-Bohleber , and D. Taylor , 31–48. Londo : Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Kächele, H. , C. Albani , A. Buchheim , M. Hölzer , R. Hohage , J. P. Jiménez , et al. 2006. “The German Specimen Case Amalia X: Empirical Studies.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87: 809–826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1516/17NN-M9HJ-U25A-YUU5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanzer, M. 1955. “The Communicative Function of a Dream.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 36: 260–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivikkokangas, S. , and M. Leiman . 2019. “Amalia X: Dialogical Sequence Analysis as a Method in Theory-Based Single Case Research in Psychoanalysis.” The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review 41 (2): 108–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01062301.2019.1597447.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, G. 2009. “The Pragmatics of Therapeutic Interaction: An Empirical Study.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 90 (5): 1075–1094. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2009.00191.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathys, H. 2012. “Communicative Functions of Dream Telling.” In The Significance of Dreams. Bridging Clinical and Extraclinical Research in Psychoanalysis , edited by P. Fonagy , H. Kächele , M. Leuzinger-Bohleber , and D. Taylor , 212–227. London : Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. E. , and B. D. Fine . 1990. Psychoanalytic Terms & Concepts . New Haven : Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. 2004. “Making Links in Psychoanalytic Interpretations: A Conversation Analytic View.” Psychotherapy Research 14 (3): 289–307. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptr/kph026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. 2005. “Patients’ Responses to Interpretations. A Dialogue between Conversation Analysis and Psychoanalytic Theory.” Communication & Medicine 2 (2): 163–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/come.2005.2.2.163
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. 2008. “Psychoanalysis and Conversation Analysis: Interpretation, Affect and Intersubjectivity.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy , edited by A. Peräkylä , C. Antaki , S. Vehviläinen , and I. Leudar , 100–119. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. 2010. “Shifting the Perspective after the Patient’s Response to an Interpretation.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 91 (6): 1363–1384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2010.00323.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. 2011. “A Psychotherapist’s Reflection on CA’s Contribution to his Own Therapeutic Talk.” In Applied Conversation Analysis. Changing Institutional Practices , edited by C. Antaki , 222–242. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. 2019. “Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy: Identifying Transformative Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52 (3): 257–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. , and S. Vehviläinen . 2003. “Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge.” Discourse and Society 14 (6): 727–750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265030146003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perelberg, R. J. 2000. “Introduction.” In Dreaming and Thinking , edited by R. J. Perelberg , 1–17. London : Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, J. 2008. “Lexical Substitution as a Therapeutic Resource.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy , edited by A. Peräkylä , C. Antaki , S. Vehviläinen , and I. Leudar , 62–79. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruusuvuori, J. 2005. “‘Empathy’ and ‘Sympathy’ in Action: Attending to Patients’ Troubles in Finnish Homeopathic and General Practice Consultations.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (3): 204–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250506800302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Pprimer in Conversation Analysis . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. , G. Jefferson , and H. Sacks . 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organisation of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53: 361–382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. 1962. “On Multiple Realities.” In Collected Papers, Vol. I: The Problem of Social Reality , edited by M. Natanson , 207–259. The Hague : Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. and T. Stivers . (eds) 2013. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis . Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B. , R. Elliott , S. P. Llewelyn , J. A. Firth-Cozens , F. R. Margison , D. A. Shapiro , and G. Hardy . 1990. “Assimilation of Problematic Experiences by Clients in Psychotherapy.” Psychotherapy 27 (3): 411–420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.27.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehviläinen, S. 2003. “Preparing and Delivering Interpretations in Psychoanalytic Interaction.” Text 23 (4): 573–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2003.022
   Google Scholar
• Vinocur-Fischbein, S. 2005. “Oneiric Activity and the Analytical Process: A Semiotic Perspective on Willy Baranger’s Theory of Dreams.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86 (5): 1329–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiste, E. , and A. Peräkylä . 2013. “A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (4): 299–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.839093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar