The psychoanalytic setting: José Bleger’s encuadre

References

• Alizade, A. M. (2002) 2010. Psychoanalysis and Positivity. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., and W. Baranger. (1961–1962) 2008. “The Analytic Situation as a Dynamic Field.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 89: 795–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00074.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranger, M., W. Baranger, and J. Mom. (1982) 1983. “Process and Non-Process in Analytic Work.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 64: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R., and B. De León De Bernardi. 2012. “The Concepts of Vínculo and Dialectical Spiral: A Bridge Between Intra- and Intersubjectivity.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 81: 531–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2012.tb00507.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bick, E. 1968. “The Experience of the Skin in Early Object Relations.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 49: 484–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. 1957. “Differentiation of the Psychotic from the Non-Psychotic Personalities.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 38: 266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. (1967) 2014. “Second Thoughts: Selected Papers on Psycho-Analysis.” In The Complete Works of W.R. Bion, edited by C. Mawson, 45–202. Vol. 6. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. 1958. Psicoanálisis y Dialéctica Materialista. Buenos Airies: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. (1963) 1973. Psicología de la Conducta. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. (1967) 2013. Symbiosis and Ambiguity: A Psychoanalytic Study. Edited by J. Churcher and L. Bleger. Translated by S. Rogers, L. Bleger, and J. Churcher. New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. 1967a. Simbiosis y ambigüedad: estudio psicoanalítico. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. 1967b. “Psicoanálisis del encuadre psicoanalítico.” Revista de Psicoanálisis(REVAPA) 24: 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. 1967c. “Psycho-analysisofthepsycho-analyticframe.” International JournalofPsychoanalysis 48: 511–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. (1969) 2012. “Theory and Practice in Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalytic Praxis.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 93: 993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2012.00593.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, L. 2017. “José Bleger's Thinking About Psychoanalysis.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 98: 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleger, L. 2023. “What is the Setting After all?” In Psychoanalysis of the Psychoanalytic Frame Revisited: A new Look at José Bleger's Classical Work, edited by C. Moguillansky, and H. B. Levine, 21–38. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bleuler, E. (1911) 1950. Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias. Translated by J. Zinkin. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, M. (1997) 2013. “Why Five Times a Week? A Candidate’s Perspective.” Bulletin of the British Psychoanalytical Society 49 (7): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, M. 2013. “Moving out – Disruption and Repair to the Internal Setting.” British Journal of Psychotherapy 29 (4): 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12043.
   Google Scholar
• Churcher, J. 2005. “Keeping the Psychoanalytic Setting in Mind.” Paper given at the Annual Conference of Lancaster Psychotherapy Clinic in collaboration with the Tavistock Clinic, at St Martin’s College, Lancaster, September 9, 2005. https://www.academia.edu/4527520/.
   Google Scholar
• Churcher, J. 2008. “Some Notes on the English Translation of The Analytic Situation as a Dynamic Field by Willy and Madeleine Baranger.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 89 (4): 785–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00073.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churcher, J. 2013. “Some implications of Jose Bleger’s concept of ‘encuadre’ (‘setting’ or ‘frame’)”. Presented at the 5th British-German Colloquium, October 11–13, Møller Centre, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Churcher, J. 2016. “Der psychoanalytische Rahmen, das Körperschema, Telekommunikation und Telepräsenz. Implikationen von José Blegers Konzepts des ‘encuadre’.” Psyche - Zeitschrift für Psychoanalyse und ihre Anwendugen 70 (1): 60–81.
   Google Scholar
• Churcher, J. 2023. “The Psychoanalytic Setting, Embodiment and Presence: Exploring José Bleger’s Concept of Encuadre.” In Psychoanalysis of the Psychoanalytic Frame Revisited: A New Look at José Bleger's Classical Work, edited by C. Moguillansky, and H. B. Levine, 39–56. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Civitarese, G. 2008. l’Intima Stanza: Teoria e tecnica del campo analitico. Roma: Borla.
   Google Scholar
• Civitarese, G. 2010. The Intimate Room: Theory and Technique of the Analytic Field. New Library of Psychoanalysis. Translated by P. Slotkin. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Civitarese, G. (2011) 2013. The Violence of Emotions: Bion and Post-Bionian Psychoanalysis. Translated by I. Harvey. New Library of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz Roche, R. 1992. “The Autistic-Contiguous Position.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 73: 363–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1839) 1913. Journal of Researches Into the Natural History and Geology of the Countries Visited During the Voyage Round the World of H.M.S. Beagle. London: John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• de Bisi, N. E., and E. Rodrigué. 1967a. “La revista frente al cambio.” Revista de Psicoanálisis (REVAPA) 24: 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• de Bisi, N. E., and E. Rodrigué. 1967b. “Notas y comentarios.” Revista de Psicoanálisis (REVAPA) 24: 699–705.
   Google Scholar
• Donnet, J.-L. 2007. “La neutralité et l’écart sujet-fonction.” Revue française de psychanalyse 71 (3): 747–762. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfp.713.0747.
   Google Scholar
• Etchegoyen, R. H. 1991. The Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique. Translated by P. Pitchon. London: Karnac Books.
   Google Scholar
• Etchegoyen, H. R., and S. Zysman. 2005. “Melanie Klein in Buenos Aires: Beginnings and Developments.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 86: 869–894. https://doi.org/10.1516/MBA1-UDP3-YMMP-54EH.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezirik, C. L., F. R. Correa, J. Nogueira, L. C. Mabilde, M. Gus, R. Hartke, and R. Levy. 2000. “The Current Context and the Analytic Setting: Between Scientific Evolution and the Impositions of the Real World.” Caracas. FEPAL 2000, pp. 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. 2012. “José Bieger's Dialectical Thinking.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 93: 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2012.00592.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. 2013. “The ‘as-yet Situation’ in Winnicott’s ‘Fragment of an Analysis’: Your Father ‘Never did you the Honor of’ … Yet.” The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 82 (4): 849–875. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2167-4086.2013.00062.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faimberg, H. 2018. “José Bleger and the Relevance Today of his Dialectical Frame.” In Reconsidering the Moveable Frame in Psychoanalysis, edited by I. Tylim, and A. Harris, 40–54. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, W. D. 1952. “Chapter II. A Revised Psychopathology of the Psychoses and Psychoneuroses (1941).” Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality 7: 28–58.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1925. “Negation.” S.E. 19: 233–240.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. 2005. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godsil, S. 2018. “Residues in the Analyst of the Patient’s Symbiotic Connection at a Somatic Level: Unrepresented States in the Patient and Analyst.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 63: 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, A. 1975. “The Analyst, Symbolization and Absence in the Analytic Setting (On Changes in Analytic Practice and Analytic Experience)—In Memory of D.W. Winnicott.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 56: 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 2012. “Commentary on José Bleger's Theory and Practice in Psychoanalysis: Psychoanalytic Praxis.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 93: 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2012.00598.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaumin, J. 1987. “Le préconscient et le travail du negatif dans l’interprétation.” Revue française de psychanalyse 51 (2): 701–711.
   Google Scholar
• Head, H., and H. G. Holmes. 1911-1912. “Sensory Disturbances from Cerebral Lesions.” Brain 34: 102–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/34.2-3.102.
   Google Scholar
• Kaës, R. 1990. Un singulier pluriel: La psychanalyse à l’épreuve du groupe. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Kaës, R. 2007. Linking, Alliances, and Shared Space: Groups and the Psychoanalyst. Translated by A. Weller. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koffka, K. 1936. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Labarthe, C. 2012. “El encuadre interno del analista.” Revista Psicoanálisis (SPP) 10: 89–104. http://spp.com.pe/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Labarthe_10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lemma, A. 2014. “The Body of the Analyst and the Analytic Setting: Reflections on the Embodied Setting and the Symbiotic Transference.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 95: 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-8315.12147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, H. B., G. S. Reed, and D. Scarfone, eds. 2013. Unrepresented States and the Construction of Meaning: Clinical and Theoretical Contributions. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, D., G. Ferschtut, and D. Sor. 1961. “El Contrato Analítico.” Revista de Psicoanálisis (REVAPA) 18: 85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Mawson, C. 2019. Psychoanalysis and Anxiety: From Knowing to Being. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. 1975. “Adhesive Identification.” Contemporary Psychoanalysis 11: 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1975.10745389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, M. 1952. “Aspects of Symbolism in Comprehension of the Not-Self.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 33: 181–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrani, J. L. 2001. Ordinary People and Extra-Ordinary Protections: A Post-Kleinian Approach to the Treatment of Primitive Mental States. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moguillansky, C., and H. B. Levine, eds. 2023. Psychoanalysis of the Psychoanalytic Frame Revisited: A New Look at José Bleger's Classical Work. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. H. 1989. “On the Concept of an Autistic-Contiguous Position.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 70: 127–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, M. 2007. “Raiding the Inarticulate: The Internal Analytic Setting and Listening Beyond Countertransference.” International JournalofPsycho-Analysis 88: 1441–1456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichon-Rivière, E. 1975. El proceso grupal: Del psicoanálisis a la psicología social. Buenos Aires: EdicionesNuevaVisión.
   Google Scholar
• Politzer, G. 1928. Critique des Fondements de la Psychologie. Paris: Les Éditions Rieder.
   Google Scholar
• Ribas, D. 1989. “De la peur de l’objet au désir d’aliénation et à la mort (l’identification adhésive et le démantèlement vus comme désintrication pulsionnelle).” Revuefrançaise de Psychanalyse 53 (4): 1111–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Rickman, J. (1951) 1959. “Reflexiones sobre la Función y Organización de una Sociedad Psicoanalítica.” Revista de Psicoanálisis (REVAPA) 16: 147–175.
   Google Scholar
• Rochefort, C. (1958) 1962. Warrior’s Rest. Translated by L. Bair. London: The New English Library Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, E. 1921. Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren: Studien in psychologische Analyse. London: Gyldendanlske Boghandel.
   Google Scholar
• Sabbadini, A. 1989. “Boundaries of Timelessness. Some Thoughts About the Temporal Dimension of the Psychoanalytic Space.” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 70: 305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachter, J., J. Tabakin, and T. Blucher. 2019. “Setting, (The Psychoanalytic).” In The IPA Inter-Regional Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychoanalysis, 394–414. www.ipa.world/IPA/Encyclopedic_Dictionary.
   Google Scholar
• Schilder, P. 1950. The Image and Appearance of the Human Body. New York: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, J. 1994. “Patient-Centered and Analyst-Centered Interpretations: Some Implications of Containment and Countertransference.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 14: 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351699409533994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachey, J. 1934. “The Nature of the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 15: 127–159.
   Google Scholar
• Temperley, J. 1984. “Settings for Psychotherapy.” British Journal of Psychotherapy 1: 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0118.1984.tb00895.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tubert-Oklander, J., and R. Hernández de Tubert. 2004. Operative Groups: The Latin American Approach to Group Analysis. London and New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tylim, I., and A. Harris, eds. 2018. Reconsidering the Moveable Frame in Psychoanalysis: Its Function and Structure in Contemporary Psychoanalytic Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. 1956. “On Transference.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 37: 386–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar