Frame, setting, process, and movement

References

• Aulagnier, P. 1975. The Violence of Interpretation: From Pictogram to Statement (The New Library of Psychoanalysis). Hove: Routledge, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. 1934. The New Scientific Spirit. Boston: Beacon Pr, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, E. 2000. “Affect and Pictographic Image: The Constitution of Meaning in Mental Life.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81: 1087–1099. https://doi.org/10.1516/0020757001600435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. 1962. Learning from Experience. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. 1963. Elements of Psychoanalysis (Marsfield Library). London: Karnac, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bion, W. R. 1970. Attention and Interpretation. London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bleger, J. 1967. “Psicoanálisis del encuadre psicoanalítico” [Psychoanalysis of psychoanalytic frame]. In Simbiosis y ambigüedad: estudio psicoanalítico [Symbiosis and Ambiguity: A Psychoanalytic Study], edited by Paidos, 237–250. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. 1999. “The Goals of Psychoanalysis.” In The Mystery of Things. NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. 2009. The Infinite Question. NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Botella, C., and S. Botella. 2001. “Figurabilité et régrédience.” Revue française de psychanalyse 65 (4): 1149–1239. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfp.654.1149
   Google Scholar
• Calich, J. C. 2004. “Comentário sobre o artigo ‘O conceito de processo analítico e o trabalho de transformação’, de Jorge Canestri” [“Commentary on the article ‘The concept of analytic process and the work of transformation’ by Jorge Canestri”, in Rev. SPPA v. 11 n. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Calich, J. C. 2017. “Intimacy as a Psychic Space and the Source-Intimacy Provoking-Internal-Object.” Panel to the IPA congress. reported by Nemas, C. 2017. Panel Report, IPA Congress Buenos Aires 2017: How Do We Understand Intimacy from an Intrapsychic Model: Where is the Unconscious in the Concept of Intimacy?. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 98: 1763–1766.
   Google Scholar
• Calich, J. C. 2019. “The Translation Activity in Jean Laplanche’s Theory of Generalized Seduction”. Document presented to the Psychoanalytic Society of Porto Alegre. Library of the Institute of the Psychoanalytic Society of Porto Alegre.
   Google Scholar
• Calich, J. C. 2021. “A arquitetura da dominação” [“The architecture of domination”], in Rev. Psicanálise da SPPA. v. 28 n. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Canestri, J. 2004. Le concept de processus analytique et le travail de transformation. Revue française de psychanalyse 68:1495-1541. Also, “O conceito de processo analítico e o trabalho de transformação” [“The concept of analytic process and the work of transformation”], in Rev. SPPA. v. 11 n. 2 (2004): Número 2.
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. 2007. Neurophilosophy at Work. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donnet, J. L. 1999. “Patients Limites, Situations Limites.” In États-limites, edited by J. André. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Donnet, J. L. 2001. “From the Fundamental Rule to the Analysing Situation.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 82 (1): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1516/3FUH-9WTT-E68B-WF70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faimberg, H. 1996. “Listening to Listening.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 77: 667–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. 1928. “l’Élasticité de la technique psychanalytique” [The elasticity of the psychoanalytic technique].” Revue française de psychanalyse 38: 507–519. 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, D. A. 1970. Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1912. Recommendations to Physicians Practising Psychoanalysis. S.E. 12, 110. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1913. On Beginning the Treatment (Further Recommendations on the Technique of Psychoanalysis I). S.E. 12. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1920. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. S.E. 18. London: The Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1930. Civilization and its Discontents. S.E. 21. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 1993. Le travail du négatif [Work of the negative]. Les Éditions de Minuit. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2001. Mythes et réalités sur le processus psychanalytique, I e II, Rev. Franç. Psychosom. 19 e 20.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2005. “The Illusion of Common Ground and Mythical Pluralism.” The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 86 (3): 627–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. 2011. “Les cas limite. De la folie privée aux pulsions de destruction et de mort.” Revue française de psychanalyse 75 (2): 375–390. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfp.752.0375
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 2018. “Otherness and the Analysis of Action.” Psychoanalytic Quarterly 87 (2): 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332828.2018.1450601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaës, R. 2018. Linking, Alliances, and Shared Space: Groups and the Psychoanalyst. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kernberg, O. 1985. Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. 1959. “Introspection, Empathy, and Psychoanalysis.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 1 (3): 459–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306515900700304
   Google Scholar
• Kohut, H. 1971. The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1969. Seminar XVII: The Other Side of Psychoanalysis: New York Norton. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. 1987b. New Foundations for Psychoanalysis. New York: The Unconscious in Translation. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. 1987. Le Baquet: Transcendence du Transfert. Problematiques V. Paris: Press Universitaires de France (PUF).
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. 1993. Entre seduction et inspiration : l’homme [Between seduction and inspiration : Man]. Paris: PUF. Collection Quadrige. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. 2003. “Três acepções da palavra inconsciente no quadro da Toeria da Sedução Generalizada.” Revista de Psicanálise da SPPA X (3).
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. 2007a. “Sexuality and Attachment in Metapsychology.” In Freud and the Sexual, 29–52. New York: The Unconscious in Translation.
   Google Scholar
• Laplanche, J. 2007b. “Three Meanings of the Word Unconscious in the Frame of the Theory of Generalized Seduction.” In The Unconscious: Further Reflections, edited by J. C. Calich and H. Hinz. London: IPA series.
   Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. 1979. The Waning of the Oedipus Complex.
   Google Scholar
• Maffesoli, M. 1992. La transfiguration du politique. Paris: Grasset. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. 1967. The Psychoanalytical Process. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. 1973. Sexual States of the Mind. London: Karnac. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, D. 1988. The Apprehension of Beauty. Perthshire: Clunie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, M. 1952. “The Role of Illusion in Symbol Formation” In New Directions in Psychoanalysis, edited by M. Klein, P. Heimann, and M. Kyrle, 82–108. London: Rouledge, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 1977. The Nature of Nature. New York: P.Lang. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, E. 2008. On Complexity (Advances in Systems Theory, Complexity, and the Human Sciences). New York: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. 1994. Subjects of Analysis. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. 1995. “Analysing Forms of Aliveness and Deadness of the Transference-Countertransference.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 76: 695–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, H. 1987. Impasse and Interpretation. NY: Routledge. 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Roussillon, R. 2019. Manual da Prática Clínica em Psicologia e Psicopatologia. São Paulo: Blucher.
   Google Scholar
• Roussillon, R. 2023. Manuel de la pratique clinique en psychologie et psychopathologie. Paris: Elsevier Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. 1983. “Reflections on Some Relations Between Psychoanalytic Concepts and Psychoanalytic Practice.” Int. Journal of Psycho-Analysis 64: 35–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrödinger, E. 1935. ““The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics.” Translated and Commented by John D. Trimmer. A Translation of Schrödinger’s “Cat Paradox” Paper.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Oct. 10, 1980 124 (5): 323–338.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, H. 1957. “Notes on Symbol Formation.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 38: 391–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern, D. B. 2003. Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, D. B. 2012. “Implicit Theories of Technique and the Values That Inspire Them.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 32 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2011.553163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, D. 2012. “Some Reflections on Psychoanalytic Technique: In Need of Core Concepts or an Archaic Ritual?.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry 32: 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. 1988. “One Psychoanalysis or Many?” The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 69: 5–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. S. 1990. “Psychoanalysis: The Common Ground.” The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 71: 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. 1955. “Metapsychological and Clinical Aspects of Regression Within the Psycho-Analytical set-up.” The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 36: 16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott, D. W. 1965. The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment. London: The Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaltzman, N. 2007. L’Esprit du mal. Paris: Édition de L’Olivier.
   Google Scholar