440
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Public Opinion about the Environment: Testing Measurement Equivalence across Countries

REFERENCES

  • Bollen, Kenneth. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
  • Brechin, Steven. 1999. “Objective Problems, Subjective Values, and Global Environmentalism: Evaluating the Postmaterialist Argument and Challenging a New Explanation.” Social Science Quarterly 84(4):793–809.
  • Brechin, Steven, and Willett Kempton. 1994. “Global Environmentalism: A Challenge to the Postmaterialism Thesis? Social Science Quarterly 75:245–269.
  • Brechin, Steven, and Willett Kempton. 1997. “Beyond Postmaterialist Values: National versus Individual Explanations of Global Environmentalism.” Social Science Quarterly 78:16–20.
  • Browne, Michael W. 1984. “Asymptotically Distribution-Free Methods for the Analysis of Covariance Structures.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37:62–83.
  • Chaisty, Paul, and Stephen Whitefield. 2015. “Attitudes towards the Environment: Are Post-Communist Societies (Still) Different? Environmental Politics 24(4):598–616.
  • Cheung, Gordon, and Roger Rensvold. 2002. “Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling 9(2):233–255.
  • Diekmann, Andreas, and Axel Franzen. 1999. “The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern.” Environment and Behavior 31(4):540–549.
  • Dunlap, Riley, George Gallup, and Alec Gallup. 1993. “Of Global Concern: Results of the Health of the Planet Survey.” Environment 35(9):7–40.
  • Dunlap, Riley, and Robert Jones. 2002. “Environmental Concern: Conceptual and Measurement Issues.” Pp. 482–524 in Handbook of Environmental Sociology, edited by Riley Dunlap and William Michelson. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Dunlap, Riley, and Richard York. 2008. “The Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of the Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys.” Sociological Quarterly 49(3):529–563.
  • Fairbrother, Malcolm. 2013. “Rich people, Poor People, and Environmental Concern: Evidence across Nations and Time.” European Sociological Review 29(5):910–922.
  • Franzen, Axel, and Reto Meyer. 2010. “Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000.” European Sociological Review 26(2):219–234.
  • Franzen, Axel, and Dominikus Vogl. 2013a. “Acquiescence and the Willingness to Pay for Environmental Protection: A Comparison of the ISSP, WVS, and EVS.” Social Science Quarterly 94:637–659.
  • Franzen, Axel, and Dominikus Vogl. 2013b. “Two Decades of Measuring Environmental Attitudes: A Comparative Analysis of 33 Countries.” Global Environmental Change 23(5):1001–1008.
  • Gelissen, John. 2007. “Explaining Popular Support for Environmental Protection: A Multilevel Analysis of 50 Nations.” Environment and Behavior 39(3):392–415.
  • Givens, Jennifer E., and Andrew K. Jorgenson. 2011. “The Effects of Affluence, Economic Development, and Environmental Degradation on Environmental Concern: A Multilevel Analysis.” Organization and Environment 24:74–91.
  • Givens, Jennifer E., and Andrew K. Jorgenson. 2013. “Individual Environmental Concern in the World Polity: A Multilevel Analysis.” Social Science Research 42:418–431.
  • Hadler, Markus, and Max Haller. 2011. “Global Activism and Nationally Driven Recycling: The Influence of World Society and National Contexts on Public and Private Environmental Behavior.” International Sociology 26:315–345.
  • Hadler, Markus, and Max Haller. 2013. “A Shift from Public to Private Environmental Behavior: Findings from Hadler and Haller (2011) Revisited and Extended.” International Sociology 28(4):484–489.
  • Haller, Max, and Markus Hadler. 2008. “Dispositions to Act in Favor of the Environment: Fatalism and Readiness to Make Sacrifices in Cross-National Perspective.” Sociological Forum 23(2):281–311.
  • Harring, Niklas. 2013. “Understanding the Effects of Corruption and Political Trust on Willingness to Make Economic Sacrifices for Environmental Protection in a Cross- National Perspective.” Social Science Quarterly 94(3):660–671.
  • Hu, Li-tze, and Peter Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6(1):1–55.
  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. “Public Support for Environmental Protection: The Impact of Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies.” PS:Political Science and Politics (March):57–71.
  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • ISSP Research Group. 2012. International Social Survey Programme: Environment III—ISSP 2010. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5500 Data file Version 2.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.11418
  • Kidd, Quentin, and Aie-Rie Lee. 1997. “Post Materialist Values and the Environment: A Critique and Reappraisal.” Social Science Quarterly 78(1):1–15.
  • Kline, Rex. 2010. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Kohn, Melvin. 1987. “Cross-National Research as an Analytical Strategy: American Sociological Association, 1987 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 52(6):713–731.
  • Kvaløy, Berit, Henning Finseraas, and Ola Listhaug. 2012. “The Publics’ Concern for Global Warming: A Cross-National Study of 47 Countries.” Journal of Peace Research 49(1):11–22.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. 2007. “Concern for the Environment among General Publics: A Cross-National Study.” Society and Natural Resources 20(10):883–898.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. 2008. “Are There Similar Influences on Environmental Concern? Comparing Industrialized Countries.” Social Science Quarterly 89(5):1–24.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. 2012a. “Environmental Concerns in Cross-National Context: How Do Publics in Central and Eastern Europe Compare with Other Regions of the World? Czech Sociological Review 48(3):441–466.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. 2012b. “Contextual Influences on Environmental Concern Cross-Nationally: A Multilevel Investigation.” Social Science Research 41(5):1085–1099.
  • Marquart-Pyatt, Sandra T. 2013. “Environmental Concern in International and Cross-National Context: Insights and Challenges for Future Research.” International Journal of Sociology 43(4):1–36.
  • McCright, Aaron, Riley Dunlap, and Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt. 2015. (forthcoming 2016). “Political Ideology and Climate Change Views in the European Union.” Environmental Politics http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1090371
  • Milfont, Taciano, and Ronald Fischer. 2010. “Testing Measurement Invariance across Groups: Applications in Cross-Cultural Research.” International Journal of Psychological Research 3:111–121.
  • Nawrotzki, Raphael J. 2012. “The Politics of Environmental Concern: A Cross-National Analysis.” Organization and Environment 25:286–307.
  • Pampel, Fred. 2014. “The Varied Influence of SES on Environmental Concern.” Social Science Quarterly 95(1):57–75.
  • Paxton, Pamela, John R. Hipp, and Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt. 2011. Nonrecursive Models: Endogeneity, Reciprocal Relationships, and Feedback Loops. Quantitative Applications in the Social Science (QASS) Series #07-168. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Przeworski, Adam, and Henry Teune. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Inquiry. New York: Wiley.
  • Tanaka, Jeff S. 1993. “Multifaceted Conceptions of Fit in Structural Equation Models.” Pp. 10–39 in Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by Kenneth Bollen and J. Scott Long. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • West, Stephen A., Aaron B. Taylor, and Wei Wu. 2012. “Model Fit and Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.” Pp. 209–231 in Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling, edited by Rick H. Hoyle. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Xiao, Chenyang, and Riley Dunlap. 2007. “Validating a Comprehensive Model of Environmental Concern Cross-Nationally: A U.S.–Canadian Comparison.” Social Science Quarterly 88(2):471–493.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.