3,343
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

An Overview of Attitudes and Opinions On the Role of Government. A Cross-national Comparison Covering the Period of 1985 to 2016

, &

References

  • Abercrombie, Nicholas. . 1990. “Popular Culture and Ideological Effects.” Pp. 199–228 in Dominant Ideologies, edited by N. Abercrombie, S. Hill, and Bryan S. Turner. . New York: Routledge.
  • Arts, Wil, and John Gelissen.. 2001. “Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?” Acta Sociologica 44(4):283–99. doi: 10.1177/000169930104400401.
  • Brandal, Nik, Øivind, Bratber, and Dag Einar Thorsen. . 2013. The Nordic Model of Social Democracy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Brooks, Clem, and Jeff Manza.. 2006. “Why Do Welfare States Persist?” Journal of Politics 68(4):816–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00472.x.
  • Castles, Francis G., and Deborah Mitchell.. 1993. “Worlds of Welfare and Families of Nations.” Pp. 93–128 in Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies, edited by Francis G. Castles. . Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
  • Dallinger, Ursula. . 2010. “Public Support for Redistribution: What Explains Cross-National Differences?” Journal of European Social Policy 20(4):333–49. doi: 10.1177/0958928710374373.
  • Eder, Anja. . 2017. “Public Support for State Redistribution in Western and Central Eastern European Countries. A Cross-National Comparative Trend Analysis.” Pp. 81–101 in Social Inequality in the Eyes of the Public. A Collection of Analyses Based on ISSP Data 1987-2009, edited by J. Edlund, I. Bechert, and Markus Quandt. . Cologne, Germany: Gesis.
  • Edlund, Jonas, and Arvid Lindh. . 2019. “The ISSP 2016 Role of Government Module: Content, Coverage, and History.” International Journal of Sociology 49(3). In print.
  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. . 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Fenger, H. J. Menno. . 2007. “Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating Post-Communist Countries in a Welfare Regime Typology.” Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences 3(2):1–30.
  • Haller, Max, Mach Bogdan, and Heinrich Zwicky.. 1995. “Egalitarismus und Antiegalitarismus zwischen gesellschaftlichen Interessen und kulturellen Leitbildern. Ergebnisse eines internationalen Vergleichs.” Pp. 221–64 in Soziale Ungleichheit und Soziale Gerechtigkeit, edited by Hans-Peter Müller and Bernd Wegener. . Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Kollmorgen, Raj. . 2009. “Postsozialistische Wohlfahrtsregime in Europa–Teil der “Drei Welten” oder eigener Typus?” Pp. 65–92 in International Vergleichende Sozialforschung. Ansätze und Messkonzepte Unter den Bedingungen der Globalisierung, edited by B. Pfau-Effinger, M. S. Sakac, and Christof Wolf. . Wiesbaden, Germany: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Powell, Martin, and Armando Barrientos.. 2004. “Welfare Regimes and the Welfare Mix.” European Journal of Political Research 43(1):83–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00146.x.
  • Sachweh, Patrick. . 2010. Deutungsmuster Sozialer Ungleichheit. New York: Campus.
  • Svallfors, Stefan. . 1997. “Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: A Comparison of Eight Western Nations.” European Sociological Review 13(3):283–304. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018219.
  • Svallfors, Stefan. . 2003. “Welfare Regimes and Welfare Opinions: A Comparison of Eight Western Countries.” Pp. 171–96 in European Welfare Production. Institutional Configuration and Distributional Outcome, edited by Joachim Vogel. . Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.