What Class, What Vote? Post-Fordist Social Groups, Class Coalitions and the Mainstream Left

References

• Andersen, J. G. e., and T. Bjørklund. 1990. “Structural Changes and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway.” Acta Sociologica 33 (3):195–217. doi: 10.1177/000169939003300303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and P. Beramendi. 2012. “Left Parties, Poor Voters, and Electoral Participation in Advanced Industrial Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 45 (6):714–46. doi: 10.1177/0010414011427880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armingeon, K., and G. Bonoli. 2006. (Ed.). The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Autor, D. A., L. F. Katz, and M. S. Kearney. 2008. “Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90 (2):300–23. doi: 10.1162/rest.90.2.300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beramendi, P., S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, and P. Kriesi. 2015. (Ed.). The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., J. Bound, and S. Machin. 1998. “Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (4):1245–1279. doi: 10.1162/003355398555892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A. 2007. “Turnout in Elections.” Pp. 621–35 in The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by H. Klingemann and R. J. Dalton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. 2006. “New Social Risks and the Politics of Post-Industrial Social Policies.” Pp. 3–26 in The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks, edited by K. Armingeon and G. Bonoli. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G. 2013. The Origins of Active Social Policy. Labor Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonoli, G., and M. Powell. 2003. Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, R. 2005. Social Mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. N., and S. M. Lipset. 1991. “Are Social Classes Dying?” International Sociology 6 (4):397–410. doi: 10.1177/026858091006004002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. 2010. “Flexibility and Security on the Labour Market. An Analysis of the Governance of Inequality.” Zeitschrift Fur Arbeitsmarkt Forschung 43:17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 1996. “Political Cleavages, Issues, and Electoral Change.” Pp. 19–42 in Comparing Democracies Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, edited by L. LeDuc, R. Niemi, and P. Norris. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Emmenegger, P., S. Häusermann, B. Palier, and M. e Seeleib-Kaiser. (Ed.). 2012. The Age of Dualization: The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, R., and J. H. Goldthorpe. 1993. The Constant Flux. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.). 1993. Changing Classes: Stratification and Mobility in Post-Industrial Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and C. Mills. 2000. “In Search of the Wage-Labour/Service Contract: New Evidence on the Validity of the Goldthorpe Class Schema.” The British Journal of Sociology 51 (4):641–61. doi: 10.1080/00071310020015307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., and J. Tilley. 2017. The New Politics of Class: The Political Exclusion of the British Working Class. Oxford, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. 2005. Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fervers, L., and H. Schwander. 2015. “Are Outsiders Equally out Everywhere? The Economic Disadvantage of Outsiders in Cross-National Perspective.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 21 (4):369–87. doi: 10.1177/0959680115573363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., and L. Soete. 1994. Work for All or Mass Unemployment? Computerised Technical Change into the 21st Century. New York: New York Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garritzmann, J. L., S. Häusermann, and B. Palier. 2019. “The World Politics of Social Investment.” article presented at the 17° ESPAnet-Europe Conference, 5–7 September 2019, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Gethin, M., C. Martinez-Toledano, and T. Piketty. 2022. “Brahmin Left versus Merchant Right: Changing Political Cleavages in 21 Western Democracies.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 137:1–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 2013. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Gingrich, J., and S. Häusermann. 2015. “The Decline of the Working-Class Vote, the Reconfiguration of the Welfare Support Coalition and Consequences for the Welfare State.” Journal of European Social Policy 25 (1):50–75. doi: 10.1177/0958928714556970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girdon, N., J. e. Adams, and W. Horne. 2018. “How Ideology, Economics and Institutions Shape Affective Polarization in Democratic Polities.” Paper presented at the annual American Political Science Association conference, Boston, Mass., 30 August–2 September.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, G. A. 2019. “Old and New Social Risks: Labour Market Policy Preferences of the Radical Right Parties.” The Case of the Lega, Politiche Sociali/Social Policies 2:333–63.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, G. A. 2022. “The Family Policy Positions of Conservative Parties: A Farewell to the Male-Breadwinner Family Model?” European Journal of Political Research 61 (3):678–98. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goos, M. e., and A. Manning. 2007. “Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (1):118–33. doi: 10.1162/rest.89.1.118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and D. W. Soskice. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassel, A., and B. Palier. 2021. Growth and Welfare in Advanced Capitalist Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. 2010. The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard Times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. 2012. “The Politics of Old and New Social Policies.” Pp. 111–32 in The New Welfare State in Europe, edited by G. Bonoli and D. Natali. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. 2018. “The Multidimensional Politics of Social Investment in Conservative Welfare Regimes: Family Policy Reform between Social Transfers and Social Investment.” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (6):862–77. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1401106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S. 2020. “Dualization and Electoral Realignment.” Political Science Research and Methods 8 (2):380–5. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2018.48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., A. Kemmerling, and D. Rueda. 2020. “How Labor Market Inequality Transforms Mass Politics.” Political Science Research and Methods 8 (2):344–55. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2018.64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusermann, S., T. e Kurer, and H. Schwander. 2015. “High-Skilled Outsiders? Labor Market Vulnerability, Education and Welfare State Preferences.” Socio-Economic Review 13 (2):235–58. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwu026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, A., and S. Jäckle. 2021. “The Shifting Class-Base of Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe.” European Politics and Society 1–18. doi: 10.1080/23745118.2021.1909806.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, E., and J. D. Stephens. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglearth, R. 2018. Cultural Evolution. People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., and A. Wren. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint: The Tilemma of the Service Economy.” World Politics 50 (4):507–46. doi: 10.1017/S0043887100007358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 2004. Diversification and Reconfiguration of Party Systems in Post-Industrial Democracies. Berlin, Bonn, Germany: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofrid, Z. and Michel, E. (2014). Exclusive Solidarity? Radical Right Parties and the Welfare State, EUI Working Paper 120.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M., C. Tien, and R. Nadeau. 2010. “Obama's Missed Landslide: A Racial Cost?” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (1):69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijparth, A. 1990. “The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws, 1945–1985.” American Political Science Review 84 (2):481–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manow, P., B. Palier, and H. Schwander. 2018. Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, G., A. Natraj, and J. Van Reenen. 2014. “Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over 25 Years.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 96 (1):60–77. doi: 10.1162/REST_a_00366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. 2005. Introduzione Alla Ricerca Comparata. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, S. K. 2018. Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann, I. 2012. “Childcare Politics in the “New” Welfare State: Class, Religion and Gender in the Shaping of Political Agendas.” Pp. 158–81 in The New Welfare State in Europe, edited by G. Bonoli and D. Natali. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. 2006. Redrawing the Class Map: Stratification and Institutions in Germany, Britain, Sweden and Switzerland. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D. 2012. “The Class Basis of the Cleavage between the New Left and the Radical Right: an analysis for Austria, Denmark, Norway and Switzerland.” Pp. 31–51 in Class Politics and the Radical Right, edited by J. Rydren. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, D., and G. Piccitto. 2019. “The Polarization Myth: Occupational Upgrading in Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the UK, 1992–2015.” Work and Occupations 46 (4):441–69. doi: 10.1177/0730888419860880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch, D., and L. Rennwald. 2018. “Electoral Competition in Europe's New Tripolar Political Space: Class Voting for the Left, Centre‐Right and Radical Right.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (4):783–807. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesch, D., and J. Rodríguez-Menés. 2011. “Upgrading or Polarization? Occupational Change in Britain, Germany, Spain and Switzerland, 1990–2008.” Socio-Economic Review 9 (3):503–31. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwq029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palier, B., and K. Thelen. 2010. “Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities and Change in France and Germany.” Politics & Society 38 (1):119–48. doi: 10.1177/0032329209357888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pisati, M. 2010. Voto di Classe. Posizione Sociale e Preferenze Politiche in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Plane, D. L e., and J. Gershtenson. 2004. “Candidates’ Ideological Locations, Abstention, and Turnout in U.S. Midterm Senate Elections.” Political Behavior 26 (1):69–93. doi: 10.1023/B:POBE.0000022344.05382.b4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers, J. P. 2014. “Statistical Evidence of Racially Polarized Voting in the Obama Elections, and Implications for Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.” The Georgetown Lae Journal 102 (3):881–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennwald, L. 2020. Social Democratic Parties and the Working Class New Voting Patterns. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, D. 2007. Social Democracy inside out: Partisanship and Labour Market Policy in Industrialized Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A., and H. Schwander. 2019. “Don’t Play If You Can’t Win’: does Economic Inequality Undermine Political Equality?” European Political Science Review 11 (3):395–413. doi: 10.1017/S1755773919000201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, H., D. Gohla, and A. Schäfer. 2020. “Fighting Fire with Fire? Inequality, Populism and Voter Turnout.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 61 (2):261–83. doi: 10.1007/s11615-020-00247-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwander, H., and S. Häusermann. 2013. “Who is in and Who is out? A Risk-Based Conceptualization of Insiders and Outsiders.” Journal of European Social Policy 23 (3):248–69. doi: 10.1177/0958928713480064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solt, F. 2008. “Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1):48–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigilia, C. 2020. (Ed.). Capitalismi e Democrazie. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O., and R. E. Dweyer. 2003. “The Patterns of Job Expansions in the United States: A Comparison of the 1960s and 1990s.” Socio-Economic Review 1 (3):289–325. doi: 10.1093/soceco/1.3.289.
   Google Scholar