Varieties of Entrepreneurship on Europe’s Periphery: Illiberal Hungary in Historical Context

References

• Acs, Z. J., and L. Szerb. 2007. “The Global Entrepreneurship Index.” Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship 5 (5):341–435. doi: 10.1561/030000002.
   Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., E. Autio, and L. Szerb. 2014. “National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement Issues and Policy Implications.” Research Policy 43 (3):476–94. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amable, B. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, D., and B. Greskovits. 2019. “Politicising Embedded Neoliberalism: continuity and Change in Hungary’s Development Model.” West European Politics 42 (5):1069–93. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2018.1511958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böröcz, J. 1992. “Dual Dependency and Property Vacuum: Social Change on the State Socialist Semiperiphery.” Theory and Society 21 (1):77–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böröcz, J. 1993. “Simulating the Great Transformation: Property Change under Prolonged Informality in Hungary.” European Journal of Sociology 34 (1):81–107. doi: 10.1017/S0003975600006561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böröcz, J. 1999. “From Comprador State to Auctioneer State: Property Change, Realignment and Peripherialization in Post-State-Socialist Central Europe.” In States and Sovereignty in the Global Economy, edited by D. A. Smith, D. Solinger, S. Topik. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Csillag, T., and I. Szelényi. 2015. “Drifting from Liberal Democracy: Traditionalist/Neoconservative Ideology of Managed Illiberal Democratic Capitalism in Post-Communist Europe.” Intersections 1 (1):18–48. doi: 10.17356/ieejsp.v1i1.28.
   Google Scholar
• Dilli, S., N. Elert, and A. M. Herrmann. 2018. “Varieties of Entrepreneurship: exploring the Institutional Foundations of Different Entrepreneurship Types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ Arguments.” Small Business Economics 51 (2):293–320. doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0002-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drahokoupil, J. 2008. Globalization and the State in Central and Eastern Europe: The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, G., I. Szelényi, and E. Townsley. 1998. Making Capitalism without Capitalists. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, G., I. Szelényi, and E. Townsley. 2001. “The Utopia of Postsocialist Theory and the Ironic View of History in Neoclassical Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (4):1121–8. doi: 10.7916/D8NV9HGF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, G., I. Szelényi, and E. Townsley. 2003. “On Irony: An Invitation to Neoclassical Sociology.” Thesis Eleven 73 (1):5–41. doi: 10.1177/0725513603073001002.
   Google Scholar
• Éber, M. Á. 2019. Class Structure of ‘Hungarian Society’ in the Modern World-System {STRG Working Papers 2019/1). http://polhist.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2019_1_STRG-Working-Papers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gál, Z., and A. Schmidt. 2017. “Geoeconomics in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications of FDI.” Pp. 76–93 in Advances in Geoeconomics, edited by J. M. Munoz. London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gál, Z. 2013. “Role of financial sector FDI in regional imbalances in Central and Eastern Europe.” Pp. 19–30 in Eurozone Enlargement: Challenges for the V4 Countries, edited by A. Gostyńska and P. Tokarski. Warsaw: The Polish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Gerőcs, T. 2021. Magyarország Függő Fejlődése. [Dependent Development in Hungary.]. Budapest: Napvilág.
   Google Scholar
• Gerőcs, T., and A. Pinkasz. 2019. Central and Eastern Europe's Dependent Development in German Automotive Value Chains (Working Paper 253). Budapest: Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Grünhut, Z., Á. Bodor, and D. Erát. 2022. “Value Patterns of Entrepreneurs in Europe: Does the Legacy of the Transition Still Matter?” International Journal of Sociology 52:1–18. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2022.2109891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and D. W. Soskice. 2001. An introduction of varieties of capitalism. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hancké, B., M. Rhodes, and M. Thatcher. 2007. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, A. M. 2019. “A Plea for Varieties of Entrepreneurship.” Small Business Economics 52 (2):331–43. doi: 10.1007/s11187-018-0093-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huszár, Á., and V. Berger. 2022. “The New Hungarian Middle Class?” International Journal of Sociology 52:1–27. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2022.2064093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolosi, T., and I. Szelényi. 2010. Hogyan Legyünk Milliárdosok? Avagy a Neoliberális Posztkommunista Kapitalizmus Szelleme. [How to be Billionaires? The Spirit of Neoliberal Post-Communist Capitalism]. Budapest: Corvina.
   Google Scholar
• Konrád. Gy.Szelényi, I. 1978. “Position of Intelligentsia in the Class Structure of State Socialist Societies.” Actes DE LA Recherche EN Sciences SOCIALES 22 (1):1: 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Konrád, Gy, and I. Szelényi. 1979. Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Körösényi, A. 2019. “The Theory and Practice of Plebiscitary Leadership: Weber and the Orbán Regime.” East European Politics and Societies: And Cultures 33 (2):280–301. doi: 10.1177/0888325418796929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körösényi, A., G. Illés, and A. Gyulai. 2020. The Orbán Regime. Plebiscitary Leader Democracy in the Making. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. and M. Myant (eds.). 2007. Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, P. T. 2022. “Charisma and Democracy: Max Weber on the Riddle of Political Change in Modern Societies.” Topoi 41:69–78. doi: 10.1007/s11245-021-09761-2.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J., and C. Woodruff. 2002. “The Central Role of Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (3):153–70. doi: 10.1257/089533002760278767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihályi, P., and I. Szelényi. 2019. The place of rent-seeking and corruption in varieties of capitalism models. Pp. 67–97 in Market Liberalism and Economic Patriotism in the Capitalist World-System, edited by T. Gerőcs and M. Szanyi. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Myant, M., and J. Drahokoupil. 2011. Transition Economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, A., and A. Vliegenthart. 2009. “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe.” World Politics 61 (4):670–702. doi: 10.1017/S0043887109990098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiring, G. 2020. The Retreat of Liberal Democracy. Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smallbone, D., and F. Welter. 2001. “The Distinctiveness of Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies.” Small Business Economics 16 (4):249–62. doi: 10.1023/A:1011159216578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, E. 2015. “Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique.” European Planning Studies 23 (9):1759–69. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelényi, I., R. Manchin, J. Pál, B. Magyar, and B. Martin. 1988. Socialist Entrepreneurs: Embourgeoisement in Rural Hungary. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szelényi, I., R. Manchin, J. Pál, B. Magyar, and B. Martin. 1989. “Socialist Entrepreneurs: Embourgeoisement in Rural Hungary.” American Journal of Sociology 95 (1):208–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelényi, I., and P. Mihályi. 2020. Varieties of Post-Communist Capitalism. Leiden: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004413191.
   Google Scholar
• Szerb, L., K. Horváth, L. Lukovszki, M. Hornyák, and Zs Fehér. 2022. “The Role of Entrepreneurship Ecosystems in Hungarian Urban Regions.” International Journal of Sociology 52:1–18. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2022.2086421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerb, L., Lafuente, E. Horvath, K., and B. Pager. 2019. “The Relevance of Quantity and Quality Entrepreneurship for Regional Performance: The Moderating Role of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem.” Regional Studies 53 (9):1308–20. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2005. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. I/22–4, edited by E. Hanke, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
   Google Scholar
• Western, B. 2020. “Inequality and Transitions.” Pp. 128–45 in Intellectuals, Inequalities and Transitions. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar