Using the Campbell Paradigm to Understand the Role of Institutional Trust in Environmental Policy Support

References

• Acedo-Carmona, C., and A. Gomila. 2014. “Personal Trust Increases Cooperation beyond General Trust.” PLoS One 9(8): E105559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50:179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mamun, A., N. Hayat, M. Mohiuddin, A. A. Salameh, M. H. Ali, and N. R. Zainol. 2022. “Modelling the Significance of Value-Belief-Norm Theory in Predicting Workplace Energy Conservation Behaviour.” Frontiers in Energy Research 10:940595. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.940595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. 1935. Attitudes. In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by C. Murchison. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., T. Böhmelt, and H. Ward. 2017. “Public Opinion and Environmental Policy Output: A Cross-National Analysis of Energy Policies in Europe.” Environmental Research Letters 12(11):114011. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrich, D., and I. Marais. 2019. A Course in Rasch Measurement Theory: Measuring in the Educational, Social and Health Sciences. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8.
   Google Scholar
• Bamberg, S., and G. Möser. 2007. “Twenty Years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A New Meta-Analysis of Psycho-Social Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 27(1):14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batool, N., M. D. Wani, S. A. Shah, and Z. A. Dada. 2023. “Theory of Planned Behavior and Value-Belief Norm Theory as Antecedents of Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Evidence from the Local Community.” Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 34:1–17. doi: 10.1080/10911359.2023.2205912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, P. C., F. Keusch, and F. Kreuter. 2019. “Trust and Cooperative Behavior: Evidence from the Realm of Data-Sharing.” PLOS One. 14(8):e0220115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauske, E., A. Kibbe, and F. G. Kaiser. 2022. Opinion Polls as Measures of People’s Personal Commitment to a Goal: Environmental Attitude in Germany From 1996 to 2018. Manuscript in Preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Bellemare, C., and S. Kröger. 2007. “On Representative Social Capital.” European Economic Review 51(1):183–202. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2006.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockarjova, M., and L. Steg. 2014. “Can Protection Motivation Theory Predict Pro-Environmental Behavior? Explaining the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in The Netherlands.” Global Environmental Change 28:276–88. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., and C. M. Fox. 2012. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun Kohlová, M., and J. Urban. 2020. “Buy Green, Gain Prestige and Social Status.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 69:101416. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brügger, A., M. H. Dorn, C. Messner, and F. G. Kaiser. 2019. “Conformity Within the Campbell Paradigm: Proposing a New Measurement Instrument.” Social Psychology 50:133–44. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunduchi, R. 2008. “Trust, Power and Transaction Costs in B2B Exchanges—A Socio-Economic Approach.” Industrial Marketing Management 37(5):610–22. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrka, K., and F. G. Kaiser. 2013. “Health Performance of Individuals within the Campbell Paradigm.” International Journal of Psychology 48(5):986–99. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.702215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellini, G., M. Acampora, L. Provenzi, L. Cagliero, L. Lucini, and S. Barello. 2023. “Health Consciousness and Pro-Environmental Behaviors in an Italian Representative Sample: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Scientific Reports 13(1):8846. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35969-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., and M. Siegrist. 2020. “The Role of Trust for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 69:101428. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovic, D., and N. Harring. 2020. “Exploring the Cross-National Variation in Public Support for Climate Policies in Europe: The Role of Quality of Government and Trust.” Energy Research & Social Science 70:101785. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boeck, P., and M. Wilson. 2011. Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., A. Dan, and R. Shwom. 2007. “Support for Climate Change Policy: Social Psychological and Social Structural Influences.” Rural Sociology 72(2):185–214. doi: 10.1526/003601107781170026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dincecco, M. 2017. State Capacity and Economic Development: Present and Past. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781108539913.
   Google Scholar
• Douenne, T., and A. Fabre. 2022. “Yellow Vests, Pessimistic Beliefs, and Carbon Tax Aversion.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 14(1):81–110. doi: 10.1257/pol.20200092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E. 2008. “The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use.” The Journal of Environmental Education 40(1):3–18. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and K. D. Van Liere. 1978. “The “New Environmental Paradigm”: A Proposed Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results.” Journal of Environmental Education 9:10–9. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., and W. Chu. 2003. “The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea.” Organization Science 14(1):57–68. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.1.57.12806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & Janovich.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M. 2016. “Trust and Public Support for Environmental Protection in Diverse National Contexts.” Sociological Science 3:359–82. doi: 10.15195/v3.a17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbrother, M., I. Johansson Sevä, and J. Kulin. 2019. “Political Trust and the Relationship between Climate Change Beliefs and Support for Fossil Fuel Taxes: Evidence from a Survey of 23 European Countries.” Global Environmental Change 59:102003. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faure, C., M.-C. Guetlein, J. Schleich, G. Tu, L. Whitmarsh, and C. Whittle. 2022. “Household Acceptability of Energy Efficiency Policies in the European Union: Policy Characteristics Trade-Offs and the Role of Trust in Government and Environmental Identity.” Ecological Economics 192:107267. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., and R. Meyer. 2010. “Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000.” European Sociological Review 26(2):219–34. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcp018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., and D. Vogl. 2013. “Two Decades of Measuring Environmental Attitudes: A Comparative Analysis of 33 Countries.” Global Environmental Change 23(5):1001–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gächter, S., B. Herrmann, and C. Thöni. 2004. “Trust, Voluntary Cooperation, and Socio-Economic Background: Survey and Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55(4):505–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerdes, R., E. Bauske, and F. G. Kaiser. 2023. “A General Explanation for Environmental Policy Support: An Example Using Carbon Taxation Approval in Germany.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 90:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., D. I. Laibson, J. A. Scheinkman, and C. L. Soutter. 2000. “Measuring Trust.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3):811–46. doi: 10.1162/003355300554926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammar, H., and S. C. Jagers. 2006. “Can Trust in Politicians Explain Individuals’ Support for Climate Policy? The Case of CO2 Tax.” Climate Policy 5:6. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, S., and L. Whitmarsh. 2023. “Choices for Climate Action: A Review of the Multiple Roles Individuals Play.” One Earth 6(9):1157–72. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.08.006.
   Google Scholar
• ISSP Research Group 2023. International Social Survey Programme: Environment IV - ISSP 2020 (2.0.0) [Dataset]. Mannheim, Germany: GESIS, Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. doi: 10.4232/1.14153.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., and A. Biel. 2000. “Assessing General Ecological Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between Switzerland and Sweden.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 16(1):44–52. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.16.1.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., K. Byrka, and T. Hartig. 2010. “Reviving Campbell’s Paradigm for Attitude Research.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 14(4):351–67. doi: 10.1177/1088868310366452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., M. Merten, and E. Wetzel. 2018. “How Do We Know We Are Measuring Environmental Attitude? Specific Objectivity as the Formal Validation Criterion for Measures of Latent Attributes.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 139–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., R. Gerdes, and F. König. 2023. “Supporting and Expressing Support for Environmental Policies.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 87:101997. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.101997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., G. Hübner, and F. X. Bogner. 2005. “Contrasting the Theory of Planned Behavior With the Value-Belief-Norm Model in Explaining Conservation.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35(10):2150–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02213.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., and C. Keller. 2001. “Disclosing Situational Constraints to Ecological Behavior: A Confirmatory Application of the Mixed Rasch Model.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 17(3):212–21. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., A. Kibbe, and L. Hentschke. 2021. “Offsetting Behavioral Costs with Personal Attitudes: A Slightly More Complex View of the Attitude-Behavior Relation.” Personality and Individual Differences 183:111158. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., and F. Lange. 2021. “Offsetting Behavioral Costs with Personal Attitude: Identifying the Psychological Essence of an Environmental Attitude Measure.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 75:101619. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, F. G., and M. Wilson. 2019. “The Campbell Paradigm as a Behavior-Predictive Reinterpretation of the Classical Tripartite Model of Attitudes.” European Psychologist 24(4):359–74. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. C., and S. L. Cooke. 2021. “Using the Health Belief Model to Explore the Impact of Environmental Empathy on Behavioral Intentions to Protect Ocean Health.” Environment and Behavior 53(8):811–36. doi: 10.1177/0013916520932637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klöckner, C. A. 2013. “A Comprehensive Model of the Psychology of Environmental Behaviour—A Meta-Analysis.” Global Environmental Change 23(5):1028–38. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, F., A. Berbekova, and A. G. Assaf. 2021. “Understanding and Managing the Threat of Common Method Bias: Detection, Prevention and Control.” Tourism Management 86:104330. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukowski, C. A., W. Hofmann, J. Roozenbeek, S. van der Linden, M. P. Vandenbergh, and K. S. Nielsen. 2023. “The Perceived Feasibility of Behavior Change is Positively Associated with Support for Domain-Matched Climate Policies.” One Earth 6(11):11. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.10.017.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, F. 2022. “Behavioral Paradigms for Studying Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Systematic Review.” Behavior Research Methods 55(2):600–22. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01825-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebe, U. 2010. “Different Routes to Explain Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Overview and Assessment.” Analyse & Kritik 32(1):137–57. doi: 10.1515/auk-2010-0108.
   Google Scholar
• Maloney, M. P., and M. P. Ward. 1973. “Ecology: Let’s Hear from the People. An Objective Scale for Measurment of Ecological Attitudes and Knowledge.” American Psychologist 28:583–6. doi: 10.1037/h0034936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayerl, J., and H. Best. 2018. “Two Worlds of Environmentalism?” Nature and Culture 13(2):208–31. doi: 10.3167/nc.2018.130202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayerl, J., and H. Best. 2019. “Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions to Protect the Environment: How Consistent is the Structure of Environmental Concern in Cross-National Comparison?” International Journal of Sociology 49(1):27–52. doi: 10.1080/00207659.2018.1560980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, L. F., and T. Bernauer. 2017. “How Strong is Public Support for Unilateral Climate Policy and What Drives It?” WIREs Climate Change 8(6):e484. doi: 10.1002/wcc.484.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. OECD Guidelines on Measuring Trust. Paris, France: OECD. doi: 10.1787/9789264278219-en.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2009. “A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems.” Science 325(5939):419–22. doi: 10.1126/science.1172133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. J. 2023. “Backlash to Climate Policy.” Global Environmental Politics 23(1):68–90. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestello, F. G. 2007. Attitudes and Behavior. In The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 1st ed., edited by G. Ritzer. New York, NY: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosa071.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. A., and I. J. Myung. 2002. “When a Good Fit Can Be Bad.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(10):421–5. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01964-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poteete, A. R., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainear, A. M., and J. L. Christensen. 2017. “Protection Motivation Theory as an Explanatory Framework for Proenvironmental Behavioral Intentions.” Communication Research Reports 34(3):239–48. doi: 10.1080/08824096.2017.1286472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, E., J. Axsen, and M. Jaccard. 2017. “Exploring Citizen Support for Different Types of Climate Policy.” Ecological Economics 137:56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. J., and C. I. Hovland. 1960. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. Pp. 1–14, in Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components, edited by C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2005. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490323.
   Google Scholar
• Savari, M., H. E. Damaneh, H. E. Damaneh, and M. Cotton. 2023. “Integrating the Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behaviour to Investigate Farmer Pro-Environmental Behavioural Intention.” Scientific Reports 13(1):5584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32831-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., M. Reimann, and K. S. Cook. 2021. “Trust in Social Relations.” Annual Review of Sociology 47(1):239–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-082120-082850.
   Google Scholar
• Shafiei, A., and H. Maleksaeidi. 2020. “Pro-Environmental Behavior of University Students: Application of Protection Motivation Theory.” Global Ecology and Conservation 22:e00908. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, N. 2013. The Signal and the Noise: The Art and Science of Prediction. London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69(1):99. doi: 10.2307/1884852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., and D. J. Brooks. 2013. Security Risk Management. Pp. 51–80, in Security Science. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394436-8.00003-5.
   Google Scholar
• Spadaro, G., K. Gangl, J.-W. Van Prooijen, P. A. M. Van Lange, and C. O. Mosso. 2020. “Enhancing Feelings of Security: How Institutional Trust Promotes Interpersonal Trust.” Plos ONE 15(9):e0237934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. 2000. “Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior.” Journal of Social Issues 56(3):407–24. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., T. Dietz, T. Abel, G. A. Guagnano, and L. Kalof. 1999. “A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism.” Human Ecology Review 6(2):81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Telesiene, A., and M. Hadler. 2023. “Dynamics and Landscape of Academic Discourse on Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors since the 1970s.” Frontiers in Sociology 8:1136972. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1136972.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tian, H., and X. Liu. 2022. “Pro-Environmental Behavior Research: Theoretical Progress and Future Directions.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(11):6721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjernström, E., and T. Tietenberg. 2008. “Do Differences in Attitudes Explain Differences in National Climate Change Policies?” Ecological Economics 65(2):315–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. 2006. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, J. 2016. “Are we Measuring Concern about Global Climate Change Correctly? Testing a Novel Measurement Approach with the Data from 28 Countries.” Climatic Change 139(10):397–411. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1812-0.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, J., Š. Bahník, and M. Braun Kohlová. 2023. “Pro-Environmental Behavior Triggers Moral Inference, Not Licensing by Observers.” Environment and Behavior 55(1–2):74–98. doi: 10.1177/00139165231163547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, J., and M. Braun Kohlová. 2020. “The COVID-19 Crisis Diminishes Neither Pro-Evnvironmental Motivation nor Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Panel Study [Preprint].” PsyArXiv doi: 10.31234/osf.io/k2gnm.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, J., and F. G. Kaiser. 2022. “Environmental Attitudes in 28 European Countries Derived from Atheoretically Compiled Opinions and Self-Reports of Behavior.” Frontiers in Psychology 13:875419. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, J., D. Vačkářová, and T. Badura. 2021. “Climate Adaptation and Climate Mitigation Do Not Undermine Each Other: A Cross-Cultural Test in Four Countries.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 77:101658. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werff, E., L. Steg, and K. Keizer. 2014. “Follow the Signal: When past Pro-Environmental Actions Signal Who You Are.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 40:273–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhallen, T. M. M., and R. G. M. Pieters. 1984. “Attitude Theory and Behavioral Costs.” Journal of Economic Psychology 5(3):223–49. doi: 10.1016/0167-4870(84)90024-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., J. Gu, J. Wu, and Y. Wang. 2024. “Perspective Taking and Public Acceptance of Nuclear Energy: Mediation of Trust in Government and Moderation of Cultural Values.” Journal of Cleaner Production 434:140012. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., J. Liang, J. Yang, X. Ma, X. Li, J. Wu, G. Yang, G. Ren, and Y. Feng. 2019. “Analysis of the Environmental Behavior of Farmers for Non-Point Source Pollution Control and Management: An Integration of the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Protection Motivation Theory.” Journal of Environmental Management 237:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J., T. Edwards, and K. Luckins. 2013. “Post Carbon Pathways: A Meta-Analysis of 18 Large-Scale Post Carbon Economy Transition Strategies.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 8:76–93. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., and J. M. Linacre. 1994. “Reasonable Mean-Square Fit Values.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 8:370–1.
   Google Scholar
• Yuriev, A., M. Dahmen, P. Paillé, O. Boiral, and L. Guillaumie. 2020. “Pro-Environmental Behaviors through the Lens of the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Scoping Review.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 155:104660. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., L. Zhou, N. Liu, and L. Zhang. 2022. “Seemingly Bounded Knowledge, Trust, and Public Acceptance: How Does Citizen’s Environmental Knowledge Affect Facility Siting?” Journal of Environmental Management 320:115941. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar